Antistatic, Flame‐Retardant, and Mechanically Resistant Cellulose/Carbon Black Cryogels for Electrostatic Discharge Packaging
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Electrically conductive foams are used as antistatic packaging for electronic items. Traditionally made from petroleum‐derived polymers, these materials typically demand high energy for production, generate considerable dust during mixing components, have poor fire resistance, and degrade slowly. To address these issues, this work proposes a sustainable alternative using microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) and carbon black (CB) to create conductive cryogels by the freeze‐drying method. The dispersibility of CB in aqueous suspensions of cationic or anionic MFC is studied, and the interactions between components are evaluated using advanced techniques, showing stronger interactions between CB and cationic cellulose. Also, the effect of CB content is assessed on the cryogels’ morphological, mechanical, and electrical properties. Results show cryogels with low densities (<55 mg cm−3), high porosities (>91%), strong network structures with high specific compression moduli (11–21 MPa cm3 g−1), and superior fire resistance. Electrical properties vary with CB content: 1–5 wt% CB results in static‐dissipative behavior (≈108 Ω cm), while ≥10 wt% CB forms a conductive network (103–101 Ω cm). Overall, cationic MFC/CB cryogels exhibit promising properties, suggesting the potential for replacing plastic‐based antistatic foams in electrical applications as a greener alternative.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Brazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory (LNNano) Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM) Campinas SP 13083‐970 Brazil
Center for Natural and Human Sciences (CCNH) Federal University of ABC (UFABC) Santo André SP 09210‐580 Brazil
Funding
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0435710.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04357 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20220421910.1002/adfm.202204219 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.009 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0044310.1021/acsapm.3c00443 ↗
5. 10.1039/C8RA01044G10.1039/C8RA01044G ↗
6. 10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e0121810.1016/j.susmat.2024.e01218 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.07.02610.1016/j.wasman.2023.07.026 ↗
8. 10.1002/nano.20210007310.1002/nano.202100073 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11894710.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118947 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10854-020-05178-610.1007/s10854-020-05178-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.065 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biteb.2023.10158710.1016/j.biteb.2023.101587 ↗
13. 10.1039/C8GC01539B10.1039/C8GC01539B ↗
14. 10.1038/s41529-022-00277-710.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0062710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00627 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7TA02807E10.1039/C7TA02807E ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-024-05955-010.1007/s10570-024-05955-0 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0440510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04405 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.3c0390610.1021/acsami.3c03906 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11968410.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119684 ↗
21. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0714810.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07148 ↗
22. 10.1039/D1NR06937C10.1039/D1NR06937C ↗
23. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0107510.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01075 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12174010.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121740 ↗
25. 10.1039/D1MA00049G10.1039/D1MA00049G ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.066 ↗
27. 10.1039/C0NR00583E10.1039/C0NR00583E ↗
28. 10.1039/C6CS00895J10.1039/C6CS00895J ↗
29. 10.1039/c2sm27344f10.1039/c2sm27344f ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.02110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.021 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12678-015-0279-510.1007/s12678-015-0279-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00550-610.1016/S0169-4332(03)00550-6 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.05810.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.058 ↗
34. 10.1039/C9RA06828G10.1039/C9RA06828G ↗
35. 10.1039/C9SM01028A10.1039/C9SM01028A ↗
36. 10.1039/D1GC00326G10.1039/D1GC00326G ↗
37. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0307110.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03071 ↗
38. 10.1039/b927505c10.1039/b927505c ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20130025610.1002/adma.201300256 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.12710.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.127 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20070181210.1002/anie.200701812 ↗
42. 10.1039/C4RA09604E10.1039/C4RA09604E ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.05410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.054 ↗
44. 10.1016/B978-0-444-53349-4.00196-510.1016/B978-0-444-53349-4.00196-5 ↗
45. 10.1088/2053-1583/aac05510.1088/2053-1583/aac055 ↗
46. 10.1002/app.4727310.1002/app.47273 ↗
47. 10.1039/C7RA01082F10.1039/C7RA01082F ↗
48. 10.1007/s00339-017-1429-910.1007/s00339-017-1429-9 ↗
49. Standard JESD625B – Requirements for Handling Electrostatic Discharge Sensitive (ESDS) Devices 2012.
50. Standard ANSI/ESD S541 – Packaging Material Standards for ESD Sensitive Items 2019.
51. 10.3390/inorganics1012022210.3390/inorganics10120222 ↗
52. 10.1002/app.4838210.1002/app.48382 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10035810.1016/j.coco.2020.100358 ↗
54. 10.1002/smll.20230694210.1002/smll.202306942 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.031 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.05210.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.052 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.07010.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.070 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.04.00110.1016/j.jcis.2020.04.001 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12492010.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124920 ↗