Assessment of Spherical Graphite for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Techniques, China's Status, Production Market, and Recommended Policies for Sustainable Development
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract With the increasing application of natural spherical graphite in lithium‐ion battery negative electrode materials widely used, the sustainable production process for spherical graphite (SG) has become one of the critical factors to achieve the double carbon goals. The purification process of SG employs hydrofluoric acid process, acid–alkali process, high‐temperature process, and chlorination roasting process in the latter process. Currently, the most widely used processes in China are the hydrofluoric acid process and the acid–alkali process, but the implementation of China's new environmental protection policy has claimed higher demands on SG production. Aimed at China's environmental policies and the production situation, this article introduces the purification principles and compares processing technology characteristics of the four processes, respectively. A model of the four SG purification processes under the same production capacity is simulated to analyze the main constraints of production including pollutant emissions, raw materials, and energy used. Based on the analysis of the sustainability of the four purification processes, it can be concluded that the high temperature roasting process is the best way to maintain sustainable projects under the condition of overcoming its high cost, according to China.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Advanced Structure Technology Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing 100081 China
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00116-210.1016/S0378-7753(03)00116-2 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.esci.2022.06.00110.1016/j.esci.2022.06.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.esci.2021.11.00110.1016/j.esci.2021.11.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.04.00310.1016/j.ijmst.2019.04.003 ↗
5. Kenan W. M. · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 1991 · 70 · 865
6. 10.1002/advs.20170078610.1002/advs.201700786 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40843-019-9464-010.1007/s40843-019-9464-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.01310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.013 ↗
9. 10.1088/0022-3727/21/1/01510.1088/0022-3727/21/1/015 ↗
10. Ge P. · MMRA · 2010 · 10 · 38
11. N.Wang M.Sc. Thesis Tsinghua University2011.
12. 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.04.00310.1016/j.ijmst.2019.04.003 ↗
13. Wang X. · Chem. Ind. Times · 2015 · 29 · 19
14. Yin J. F. · Carbon · 2015 · 2 · 35
15. Xie G. · Yunnan Metallurgy · 2011 · 40 · 48
16. 10.1016/0379-6787(83)90015-710.1016/0379-6787(83)90015-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.10555310.1016/j.hydromet.2021.105553 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1600-0692.2004.00697.x10.1111/j.1600-0692.2004.00697.x ↗
19. 10.1080/08827508.2015.111599210.1080/08827508.2015.1115992 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0892-6875(02)00172-310.1016/S0892-6875(02)00172-3 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tca.2016.11.01210.1016/j.tca.2016.11.012 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60537-210.1016/S1001-0742(10)60537-2 ↗
23. Feng Q. M. · Conserv. Util. Miner. Resour. · 2003 · 3 · 20
24. WANG D. S. · Build. Mater. Ind. Inf. · 1991 · 19
25. Zhang R. · 2006 · 59
26. Ge P. · Metal Mine (AnHui) · 2010 · 5 · 96
27. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0009010.1021/acsaem.0c00090 ↗
28. Hu X. L. · New Carbon Mater. · 2016 · 31 · 532