journal article·2022-01Open access

Biopolymer‐Nanocomposite Hybrid Materials as Potential Strategy to Remove Pesticides in Water: Occurrence and Perspectives

Estefanía Baigorria, Leonardo F. Fraceto

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 6· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract During the last three decades, the use of pesticides to increase agricultural yields has grown exponentially and excessively. These agricultural practices, in conjunction with various natural factors, have led to the contamination of water bodies. Preserving contamination‐free hydrographic basins is a challenge and a priority of the community. This article first presents a classification of the various pesticides, the existing regulations concerning their use, and their influence on the aquatic environment. Several methodologies for the removal of pesticides from aqueous media are presented, with emphasis on adsorption techniques. In addition, a discussion is provided for materials with nanoscale characteristics as promising adsorbents of pesticides present in water. A focus on research regarding nanostructured hybrid biopolymeric materials is proposed, with critical appraisal and future perspectives. Factors such as the ability to recover, regenerate, and reuse these hybrids, together with their environmentally friendly characteristics, make them highly attractive options for the proposed purpose. However, their current application in the treatment of pesticide‐contaminated water remains low. This new generation of biopolymeric nanocomposite hybrid materials emerges as a viable, cost‐effective, and eco‐friendly option for use in the provision of safe water to society.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Environmental Nanotechnology Laboratory Department of Environmental Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP) Av. Três de Março, 511 Sorocaba SP 18087‐180 Brazil

Composite Materials Group (CoMP) Materials Science and Technology Research Institute (INTEMA) National Scientific and Technical Research Council – Argentina (CONICET) National University of Mar del Plata (UNMdP) Av. Colón 10850 Mar del Plata CP 7600 Argentina

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10311-021-01183-110.1007/s10311-021-01183-1 ↗
2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) “International Year of Plant Health 2020” http://www.fao.org/plant-health-2020/home/en/(accessed: April 2021).
3. R.Markets Biopesticides Market by Type Source Mode of Application Formulation Crop Application and Region–Global Forecast to 2025.2020.
4. Sanchez L. M. · 2020
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12645110.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126451 ↗
6. 10.1186/s43088-021-00109-810.1186/s43088-021-00109-8 ↗
7. 10.3390/ijerph1802046810.3390/ijerph18020468 ↗
8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) The Future of Food and Agriculture – Alternative Pathways to 2050 Rome 2018.
9. U. Nations Sustainable Development Goals https://sdgs.un.org/goals 2015.
10. World Health Organization (WHO) The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification Chemical Safety and Healt Unit 2020.
11. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.11.01410.1016/j.pestbp.2014.11.014 ↗
12. Herbicide Resistance Action Committee (HRAC) Review of the herbicide MoA classification https://hracglobal.com/tools/2020-review-of-the-herbicide-moa-classification(accessed: May 2021).
13. Beffa R. · 2019
14. Nefed´eva E. E. · 2021
15. Insecticide Resistance Action Committee Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) http://www.irac-online.org(accessed: May 2021).
16. Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) The IRAC mode of action classification online https://irac-online.org/modes-of-action/(accessed: May 2021).
17. F. Funguicide Resistance Action Committee Clasificación de Fungicidas y Bactericidas Según El Modo de Acción España 2019.
18. 10.1016/S0926-3373(98)00020-410.1016/S0926-3373(98)00020-4 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8TA10046B10.1039/C8TA10046B ↗
20. 10.3390/w1302018110.3390/w13020181 ↗
21. Ahamad A. · 2020
22. 10.2175/106143011X1307559987029810.2175/106143011X13075599870298 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.crvi.2017.07.00910.1016/j.crvi.2017.07.009 ↗
24. Han M. A. · Eur. J. Cancer Prev. · 2018 · 1 · 344
25. 10.1080/10590501.2010.52578210.1080/10590501.2010.525782 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.20710.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.207 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14189510.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141895 ↗
28. Singh Y. · 2020
29. 10.1038/s41565-018-0203-210.1038/s41565-018-0203-2 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41565-018-0234-810.1038/s41565-018-0234-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.11223610.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112236 ↗
32. 10.3390/catal301018910.3390/catal3010189 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12215610.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122156 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.enmm.2020.10036410.1016/j.enmm.2020.100364 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-3-030-11155-7_61-110.1007/978-3-030-11155-7_61-1 ↗
36. 10.1080/00986445.2018.156491010.1080/00986445.2018.1564910 ↗
37. Rizwan M. · 2021
38. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12677010.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126770 ↗
39. 10.1155/2014/82591010.1155/2014/825910 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.21311110.1016/j.ccr.2019.213111 ↗
41. Baigorria E. · 2021 · 1
42. Sudha P. N. · 2018
43. 10.1201/b13155-210.1201/b13155-2 ↗
44. 10.3390/molecules2603059410.3390/molecules26030594 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10311-020-01001-010.1007/s10311-020-01001-0 ↗
46. 10.1007/978-981-15-6699-8_1710.1007/978-981-15-6699-8_17 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.05.01010.1016/j.jwpe.2014.05.010 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.00610.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.006 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.10.01910.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.10.019 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.03710.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.037 ↗
51. 10.1080/19443994.2014.93079710.1080/19443994.2014.930797 ↗
52. 10.3390/molecules2510233910.3390/molecules25102339 ↗
53. 10.1080/19443994.2013.79213710.1080/19443994.2013.792137 ↗
54. Chang K.‐L. · Int. J. Agric. Biosyst. Eng. · 2011 · 5 · 210
55. 10.1080/03601234.2018.155030710.1080/03601234.2018.1550307 ↗
56. 10.1007/s11356-016-6202-710.1007/s11356-016-6202-7 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.00510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.005 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.00210.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.002 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.06910.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.069 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.02610.1016/j.cej.2011.08.026 ↗
61. 10.1080/19443994.2013.77411810.1080/19443994.2013.774118 ↗
62. 10.1260/02636170878825136710.1260/026361708788251367 ↗
63. 10.1002/clen.20110020910.1002/clen.201100209 ↗
64. Ahmed S. M. · Am. J. Exp. Agric. · 2014 · 4 · 302
65. 10.2166/wst.2012.93510.2166/wst.2012.935 ↗
66. 10.1080/01496395.2018.152072310.1080/01496395.2018.1520723 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10390410.1016/j.jece.2020.103904 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.01310.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.013 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.20410.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.204 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.05.01110.1016/j.arabjc.2020.05.011 ↗
71. 10.1007/s11356-017-0159-z10.1007/s11356-017-0159-z ↗
72. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.10310.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.103 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.00410.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.004 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.06.02910.1016/j.jcis.2016.06.029 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.microc.2018.10.05310.1016/j.microc.2018.10.053 ↗
76. 10.1007/s10853-018-2352-y10.1007/s10853-018-2352-y ↗
77. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12506010.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125060 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.clay.2013.07.00710.1016/j.clay.2013.07.007 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.03610.1016/j.clay.2015.12.036 ↗
80. 10.1080/09593330.2014.91457310.1080/09593330.2014.914573 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.01410.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.014 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10462310.1016/j.jece.2020.104623 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.02710.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.027 ↗
84. 10.1039/D0NJ02259D10.1039/D0NJ02259D ↗
85. 10.1260/0263-6174.33.5.45710.1260/0263-6174.33.5.457 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.watres.2006.01.00110.1016/j.watres.2006.01.001 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.clay.2005.07.00810.1016/j.clay.2005.07.008 ↗
88. Laurella S. L. · Int. J. Eng. Technol. Res. · 2015 · 3 · 96
89. 10.1021/es051441r10.1021/es051441r ↗
90. 10.1080/02772248.2015.104152810.1080/02772248.2015.1041528 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.00210.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.002 ↗
92. 10.1080/19443994.2014.96156210.1080/19443994.2014.961562 ↗
93. 10.1039/D0EW00619J10.1039/D0EW00619J ↗
94. 10.1007/978-3-030-02327-0_210.1007/978-3-030-02327-0_2 ↗
95. 10.1002/978352761049510.1002/9783527610495 ↗
96. Kaur S. · 2015
97. 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.00210.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002 ↗
98. 10.1111/jiec.1273210.1111/jiec.12732 ↗
99. 10.1039/C7TA08399H10.1039/C7TA08399H ↗
100. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10512110.1016/j.jece.2021.105121 ↗