Optimized Salt Selection for Solar Thermal Latent Heat Energy Storage
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract For solar thermal power to be cost effective as a baseload generation paradigm, the cost and efficiency of every subsystem must be improved. To reduce the cost of thermal storage and increase the working temperature of the subsystems for greater efficiency, appropriate storage materials must be identified for study. Unfortunately, there is an enormous search space of salt mixtures that are suitable candidates for thermal storage and must be analyzed for cost effectiveness to determine which candidates are the best. To lessen the experimental burden, this article combines previously validated theories for estimating the properties of salt mixtures with an analytic design optimization method to better estimate the true cost of each candidate. Five hundred and sixty three binary, ternary, and quaternary mixtures are analyzed. Five mixtures are identified as the prime candidates for a cascaded latent heat thermal energy storage system for a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle generator. This system is cheaper than the Sunshot Initiative cost targets, bringing the solar thermal paradigm into cost competition with fossil fuels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase Change Materials Research · Adsorption and Cooling Systems · Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology 2 George St Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia
Funding
Australian Renewable Energy Agency
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.solener.2004.04.01110.1016/j.solener.2004.04.011 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.01110.1016/j.rser.2009.11.011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.04610.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.046 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.07.02010.1016/j.solmat.2012.07.020 ↗
5. Gomez J. C. · NREL Milestone Report · 2011
6. Maru H. C. · 1978
7. Nandi B. R. · 2012 · 438
8. Jacob R. · Asia‐Pacific Solar Research Conf. · 2014
9. 10.1016/S0038-092X(97)00104-710.1016/S0038-092X(97)00104-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.01310.1016/j.energy.2017.06.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.27410.1016/j.rser.2016.11.274 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.02510.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.025 ↗
13. Raud R. · Proc. of the 10th Australasian Heat and Mass Transfer Conf. · 2016
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.03310.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jct.2011.05.00210.1016/j.jct.2011.05.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/0021-9614(76)90147-610.1016/0021-9614(76)90147-6 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.209580810.1149/1.2095808 ↗
18. Heidenreich G. R. · Proc. of the 21st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf. · 1986
19. Susarev M. P. · Russ. J. Appl. Chem. · 1974 · 47 · 526
20. 10.1134/S003602360602024010.1134/S0036023606020240 ↗
21. Janz G. J. · Molten Salts · 1968 · 1 · 2
22. Janz G. J. · Molten Salts · 1979 · 10
23. Janz G. J. · Molten Salts · 1972 · 3 · 581
24. 10.1063/1.55552710.1063/1.555527 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.55555210.1063/1.555552 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.55559010.1063/1.555590 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.55563510.1063/1.555635 ↗
28. Janz G. J. · National Bureau of Standard Report · 1981
29. 10.1063/1.55569310.1063/1.555693 ↗
30. 10.1201/978131538047610.1201/9781315380476 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.03.02810.1016/j.solmat.2014.03.028 ↗
32. Factsage 6.4.
33. 10.1016/S0040-6031(00)00420-210.1016/S0040-6031(00)00420-2 ↗
34. 10.2475/ajs.262.1.6610.2475/ajs.262.1.66 ↗
35. Chemical Market Reporter Schnell Publishing Company California2006.
36. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.04610.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.046 ↗
37. Guo S. · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2018
38. AS1210 · 2010
39. 2016
40. 2008