journal article·2025-05Open access

Upcycling Canola: Closed‐Loop Water Retting System for Sustainable Fiber Production from Waste Canola Stalks

Md Shadhin, Raghavan Jayaraman, Danny Mann, Ying Chen, Vahid Sadrmanesh, Yanxing Niu, Anna Rogiewicz, Mashiur Rahman

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 9· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract A closed‐loop water retting system is developed and fabricated in this study to process discarded canola stalks into fibers. The effects of retting parameters are studied using Latin Hypercube statistical design, modeled using Altair HyperStudyTM, and subjected to a multi‐objective optimization. The retting time is reduced from a range of ≈168–1080 h for the conventional water retting system to 60 h for the developed closed‐loop system. The fiber yield increased from ≈0.84% to 11.26%, the crystallinity index (CI) increased from ≈55.6% to 67.3%, and linear density decreased from ≈73.6 to 51.7 Tex with the increase in retting time, temperature, and water flow rate. However, the overall trends are complicated due to the heterogeneity in the structures and properties of the starting plant materials. The optimal retting parameters are 60 h‐time, 60 °C‐temperature, and 150 mL min−1‐water flow rate. Under these conditions, canola fibers exhibited ≈11.26% yield, ≈67.32% crystallinity index, and ≈56.24 Tex linear density. Canola fibers exhibited a multifiber structure surface (mean fiber diameter ≈957.8 µm) and non‐cellulosic component dominant cross‐section due to their higher pectic polysaccharides content (≈32.5–41.8%). The canola fiber production accounts for ≈169.42 kg CO2e/tonne, which is significantly lower than the emissions associated with equivalent flax fiber production (≈403.15 kg).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biosystems Engineering University of Manitoba Winnipeg MB R3T 2N2 Canada

Composite Materials and Structures Research Group and Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manitoba Winnipeg MB R3T 2N2 Canada

Advanced Technology & Innovation Group Soil and Crop Modeling Team CNH Industrial Canada Ltd Saskatoon Saskatchewan S7P 0A3 Canada

Department of Animal Science University of Manitoba Winnipeg MB R3T 2N2 Canada

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adsu.20230058710.1002/adsu.202300587 ↗
2. Hoekstra A. Y. · 2015 · 221
3. 10.1002/adsu.20220024810.1002/adsu.202200248 ↗
4. 10.1080/1544047090334578410.1080/15440470903345784 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.033 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14173310.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141733 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11789110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117891 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11498610.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114986 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10681-004-4754-y10.1007/s10681-004-4754-y ↗
10. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11725210.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117252 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13506310.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135063 ↗
12. 10.1186/1471-2229-14-5010.1186/1471-2229-14-50 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.04410.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.044 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10924-011-0380-710.1007/s10924-011-0380-7 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.07310.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.073 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1758110.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17581 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e2151310.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21513 ↗
18. 10.1080/15440478.2015.102919910.1080/15440478.2015.1029199 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13649510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136495 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13402910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134029 ↗
21. 10.1177/004051751988663610.1177/0040517519886636 ↗
22. 10.13031/trans.1388310.13031/trans.13883 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10570-023-05438-810.1007/s10570-023-05438-8 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10570-019-02429-610.1007/s10570-019-02429-6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.00910.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.009 ↗
27. 10.1080/15440478.2021.200939310.1080/15440478.2021.2009393 ↗
28. 10.1080/15440478.2022.214966110.1080/15440478.2022.2149661 ↗
29. 10.1002/app.5476510.1002/app.54765 ↗
30. 10.1166/jbmb.2013.134210.1166/jbmb.2013.1342 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10604310.1016/j.jece.2021.106043 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00226-020-01258-210.1007/s00226-020-01258-2 ↗
33. 10.15376/biores.12.4.9183-919710.15376/biores.12.4.9183-9197 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.07710.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.077 ↗
35. 10.1080/15440478.2018.143065010.1080/15440478.2018.1430650 ↗
36. 10.1179/sic.2003.48.4.26910.1179/sic.2003.48.4.269 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0502910.1021/acsomega.0c05029 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.04710.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.047 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2625610.1002/pc.26256 ↗
40. Fahimian M. · 2013
41. 10.1186/s40643-021-00453-810.1186/s40643-021-00453-8 ↗
42. Poletto M. · 2015 · Ch. 21
43. M.Barth M.Carus Carbon Footprint and Sustainability of Different Natural Fibres for Biocomposites and Insulation Material from http://eiha.org/media/2019/03/19‐03‐13‐Study‐Natural‐Fibre‐Sustainability‐Carbon‐Footprint.pdf. (accessed: February2024).
44. Manitoba's Energy Roadmap Manitoba Energy Landscape & GHG Emissions 2023 https://www.gov.mb.ca/jec/files/mb_energy_roadmap.pdf (accessed: July 2023).
45. Khan M. R. I. · 2016
46. 10.1002/jsfa.274053020510.1002/jsfa.2740530205 ↗
47. 10.1039/an982070030710.1039/an9820700307 ↗
48. 10.1021/ac50043a03610.1021/ac50043a036 ↗