Responsible Humidity Sensor by Direct Laser Writing on Cork Substrate
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A novel laser‐induced graphene (LIG) resistive relative humidity (RH) sensor is successfully fabricated by direct laser writing on a common natural cork sheet. In this work, a straightforward fabrication is presented where LIG, porous multilayer graphene, is generated by a laser photothermal process on a carbon‐based substrate, in this case, an agglomerate cork sheet. The formation of LIG material is revealed by structural and morphological characterization using various analyses, including Raman spectroscopy, X‐ray Photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The electrical analyses are conducted to measure the resulting sheet resistance, getting results as low as 31 Ω sq−1. With the laser parameter optimized, a LIG resistive humidity transducer is manufactured and characterized in a climate chamber. This biodegradable sensor shows good linearity with a sensitivity of 0.015%/%RH from 40 to 80% RH. Additionally, the influence of temperature is studied and demonstrated a low impact on the sensor's response toward RH. Furthermore, a proof of concept is successfully implemented by integrating the transducer onto a cork stopper. Considering all, the prospect of creating an easy, fast, scalable, and cost‐effective transducer combined with the use of natural and abundant materials, leads the way for future large‐scale production of sustainable sensors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics and Computer Technology Faculty of Sciences University of Granada Granada 18071 Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación · Consejería de Conocimiento, Investigación y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. V.Forti C. P.Balde R.Kuehr G.Bel The Global E‐waste Monitor UNU/UNITAR SCYCLE ITU ISWA 2020.
2. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2022.01.00110.1016/j.pnsc.2022.01.001 ↗
3. 10.1002/ieam.179710.1002/ieam.1797 ↗
4. Skákalová V. · 2021
5. 10.1007/s11367-020-01864-z10.1007/s11367-020-01864-z ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1503101210.3390/ma15031012 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20180362110.1002/adma.201803621 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0008410.1021/acs.accounts.8b00084 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.trechm.2021.09.00110.1016/j.trechm.2021.09.001 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41528-019-0056-210.1038/s41528-019-0056-2 ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms420610.1038/ncomms4206 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15762910.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157629 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.0c2027010.1021/acsami.0c20270 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.03110.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.031 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0120210.1021/acsaelm.1c01202 ↗
16. 10.1063/5.010078510.1063/5.0100785 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.3c0768710.1021/acsami.3c07687 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0853910.1021/acsnano.7b08539 ↗
19. 10.1179/174328005X4116810.1179/174328005X41168 ↗
20. 10.1002/adsr.20230002610.1002/adsr.202300026 ↗
21. 10.1088/2058-8585/ac8e7b10.1088/2058-8585/ac8e7b ↗
22. 10.1002/admt.20200063010.1002/admt.202000630 ↗
23. 10.1002/admi.20180096910.1002/admi.201800969 ↗
24. 10.3390/s1812435210.3390/s18124352 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0610610.1021/acsomega.0c06106 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13668710.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136687 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.11236010.1016/j.bios.2020.112360 ↗
28. 10.1007/s40820-022-00895-510.1007/s40820-022-00895-5 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.1c2372510.1021/acsami.1c23725 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41528-022-00133-310.1038/s41528-022-00133-3 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0072110.1021/acsaelm.2c00721 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsaelm.3c0065310.1021/acsaelm.3c00653 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.03810.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.038 ↗
34. 10.3390/nano903042210.3390/nano9030422 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10854-020-03766-010.1007/s10854-020-03766-0 ↗
36. 10.3390/jfb1302007710.3390/jfb13020077 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9NA00179D10.1039/C9NA00179D ↗
38. 10.1002/admt.20210131110.1002/admt.202101311 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20190277110.1002/adfm.201902771 ↗
40. 10.1002/adfm.20210776810.1002/adfm.202107768 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20170221110.1002/adma.201702211 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0259610.1021/acsnano.9b02596 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41598-021-83421-810.1038/s41598-021-83421-8 ↗
44. I.Children L. A.Jauregui W.Park H.Cao Y. P.Chen New Developments in Photon and Materials Research 2013 1 3.
45. 10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
46. 10.1088/2043-6262/4/3/03501210.1088/2043-6262/4/3/035012 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.06910.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.069 ↗
48. 10.1002/elan.20210042510.1002/elan.202100425 ↗
49. 10.15376/biores.10.3.Pereira10.15376/biores.10.3.Pereira ↗
50. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.01.01810.1016/j.indcrop.2012.01.018 ↗
51. 10.15376/biores.12.2.2339-235310.15376/biores.12.2.2339-2353 ↗
52. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0029710.3389/fmats.2020.00297 ↗
53. 10.1007/s00226-017-0959-910.1007/s00226-017-0959-9 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12010910.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120109 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.08.05510.1016/j.snb.2009.08.055 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0434010.1021/acsomega.0c04340 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.01010.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.010 ↗
58. 10.3390/f1304062310.3390/f13040623 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.03410.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.034 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.12.11710.1016/j.snb.2013.12.117 ↗
61. 10.1039/C8TA00618K10.1039/C8TA00618K ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0425910.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04259 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.01310.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.013 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.11642010.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116420 ↗
65. 10.1007/s12598-020-01524-z10.1007/s12598-020-01524-z ↗
66. 10.1021/acsami.1c2091810.1021/acsami.1c20918 ↗
67. 10.1002/nano.20210034310.1002/nano.202100343 ↗
68. 10.5424/fs/2010192-0131310.5424/fs/2010192-01313 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.11106310.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111063 ↗
70. Standard Test Method for Sheet Resistance Uniformity Evaluation by In‐Line Four‐Point Probe with the Dual‐Configuration Procedure American society for testing and materials1997 10 13.