journal article·2022-12

A Green Synthesis of 5,5′‐[Oxybis(methylene)]bis‐2‐Furfural: from By‐Product to Attractive Bio‐Based Platform Chemical

Mattia Annatelli, Giacomo Trapasso, Davide Dalla Torre, Luca Pietrobon, Davide Redolfi‐Bristol, Fabio Aricò

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 6· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this work, a green synthetic approach to 5,5′‐[oxybis(methylene)]bis‐2‐furfural (OBMF) from 5‐hydroxymethyl‐2‐furfural (HMF) is reported for the first time. In the optimized reaction conditions, dimethyl carbonate (DMC) is used as the preferred green solvent and iron(III) sulfate as the best catalyst, recyclable up to three times. The HMF self‐etherification reaction is conducted both in milligram‐ and gram‐scale with isolated yields up to 99% and 81% respectively. OBMF is further derivatized via reduction to achieve 5,5′‐oxybis(methylene)bis(furan‐5,2‐diyl)dimethanol (OBMF‐H), a potential bisphenol‐A biobased alternative. Thus, methoxycarbonylation of OBMF‐H leads to the biscarboxymethylated derivative (OBMF‐DC) employing, once again, DMC as solvent and reagent. Both OBMF‐H and OBMF‐DC are achieved in high yields and are fully characterized. Furthermore, thermogravimetric analysis of OBMF, OBMF‐H, and OBMF‐DC establishes that these compounds are more thermally stable than HMF and its derivatives. In fact, they can withstand up to 200 °C before undergoing complete degradation rendering OBMF and its derivatives valuable bio‐based monomers for bioplastics prepared via polycondensation reaction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysis for Biomass Conversion · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Chemical Synthesis and Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics Ca’ Foscari University of Venice Campus Scientifico, Via Torino 155 Venezia Mestre 30172 Italy

Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems Ca’ Foscari University of Venice Campus Scientifico, Via Torino 155 Venezia Mestre 30172 Italy

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.05710.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.057 ↗
2. 10.1039/C1CS15147A10.1039/C1CS15147A ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.03510.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.035 ↗
4. 10.1039/b922014c10.1039/b922014c ↗
5. 10.1039/c0gc00401d10.1039/c0gc00401d ↗
6. 10.1021/cr100171a10.1021/cr100171a ↗
7. 10.1039/c0gc00639d10.1039/c0gc00639d ↗
8. 10.1039/C6GC02415G10.1039/C6GC02415G ↗
9. 10.1039/c1gc15537g10.1039/c1gc15537g ↗
10. 10.1002/asia.20170094010.1002/asia.201700940 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.05.00810.1016/j.cattod.2011.05.008 ↗
12. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0027110.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00271 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b0114810.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01148 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0149110.1021/acscatal.5b01491 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5PY02032H10.1039/C5PY02032H ↗
16. 10.1002/cssc.20160012210.1002/cssc.201600122 ↗
17. 10.1002/cssc.20130053110.1002/cssc.201300531 ↗
18. Price list on Merck catalogue (see Merk website).
19. 10.1002/cssc.20180029710.1002/cssc.201800297 ↗
20. 10.1002/cssc.20190279910.1002/cssc.201902799 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20160288310.1002/anie.201602883 ↗
22. 10.1021/i300001a02210.1021/i300001a022 ↗
23. 10.1002/jctb.28053011610.1002/jctb.280530116 ↗
24. R.Wen F.Yu X.Dong Y.Miao P.Zhou Z.Lin J.Zheng H.Wang L.Huang D.Qing CN 1456556 A 2003.
25. 10.1021/ja00829a08510.1021/ja00829a085 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00004-X10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00004-X ↗
27. 10.1016/0144-4565(87)90072-210.1016/0144-4565(87)90072-2 ↗
28. M. P.Sibi S.Sermadurai N.Zimmermann E.Serum G.Ma R.Moorthy K.Kalliokoski US2017/233325 A1 2017.
29. 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.08.00210.1016/j.jcat.2010.08.002 ↗
30. 10.1002/cctc.20170045710.1002/cctc.201700457 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.catcom.2016.09.03410.1016/j.catcom.2016.09.034 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mcat.2020.11112510.1016/j.mcat.2020.111125 ↗
33. 10.1039/D0CY00733A10.1039/D0CY00733A ↗
34. 10.1016/j.catcom.2014.10.00910.1016/j.catcom.2014.10.009 ↗
35. 10.1002/cssc.20210081810.1002/cssc.202100818 ↗
36. 10.1002/cctc.20180156010.1002/cctc.201801560 ↗
37. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0141310.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01413 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.scp.2020.10035210.1016/j.scp.2020.100352 ↗
39. 10.1039/D1GC04408G10.1039/D1GC04408G ↗
40. 10.1021/op060155c10.1021/op060155c ↗
41. 10.1039/c1gc15523g10.1039/c1gc15523g ↗
42. Sakamoto S. · Chem. Today · 2013 · 31 · 24
43. 10.1002/cssc.20190007910.1002/cssc.201900079 ↗
44. 10.1002/cssc.20180176810.1002/cssc.201801768 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.11590310.1016/j.seppur.2019.115903 ↗
46. 10.1039/C7GC01764B10.1039/C7GC01764B ↗
47. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0170510.1021/acsomega.7b01705 ↗
48. 10.1039/a900157c10.1039/a900157c ↗
49. BASF SE Lutropur – the friendly acid. The purest form of MSA methanesulfonic acid made by BASF 2011.
50. B.Fonfe C. K.Cheung A.Hartwig N.Duerr US2019/0077748 A1 2019.
51. Springborn Laboratories Inc. An Acute Oral Toxicity Study in Rats with 70% Methane Sulfonic Acid SLI Study SLI Study No. 3255.11 07/11/97.
52. 10.1016/j.tet.2011.01.00910.1016/j.tet.2011.01.009 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.10.01110.1016/j.jcis.2003.10.011 ↗
54. A.Verhage G. J. M.Bijl F.Verheij WO2019/137998 A1 2019.
55. Nouri S. · TraumaMon. · 2015 · 20 · 25257
56. 10.4103/JCD.JCD_259_1610.4103/JCD.JCD_259_16 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.05.02410.1016/j.fuel.2009.05.024 ↗
58. 10.1002/cssc.20220032810.1002/cssc.202200328 ↗
59. 10.1021/bm500340w10.1021/bm500340w ↗
60. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0200710.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02007 ↗
61. 10.1002/slct.20180019810.1002/slct.201800198 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c0019610.1021/acs.oprd.2c00196 ↗