journal article·2021-09Open access

Optimizing Intercropping Systems of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.) and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum‐graecum L.) through Inoculation with Bacteria and Mycorrhizal Fungi

Esmaeil Rezaei‐Chiyaneh, Martin Leonardo Battaglia, Amir Sadeghpour, Fahime Shokrani, Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab, Muhammad Ali Raza, Moritz von Cossel

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 5· Issue 9

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the effects of intercropping patterns, plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on seed yield and yield components of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum‐graecum L.), as well as the essential oil and fatty acid profile of black cumin. A two‐year two‐factorial field experiment was conducted in 2015 and 2016 to investigate intercropping of black cumin and fenugreek in five ratios and biofertilizer application as AMF and bacteria. Intercropping reveals higher concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus compared with monocropping, whereas monocropping inoculated with bacteria shows the highest seed yield of both fenugreek (151 g m−2) and black cumin (148 g m−2). Regarding the quality of black cumin, the combination of a black cumin:fenugreek‐intercropping pattern of 66:34 with bacteria fertilization is most promising, as it shows i) the maximum essential oil content, oil yield, and fixed oil content, ii) the highest contents of thymol and p‐cymene, iii) the highest content of linoleic acid, and iv) the maximum land equivalent ratio. Conclusively, bacteria fertilization and black cumin:fenugreek‐intercropping pattern of 66:34 helps improving essential oil, fixed oil quality, and quantity of black cumin, thus creating a more sustainable cultivation system for black cumin and fenugreek.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems · Nigella sativa pharmacological applications · Plant Parasitism and Resistance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Plant Production and Genetics Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Urmia University Urmia Iran

Department of Animal Science Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA

Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems College of Agricultural Sciences Southern Illinois University Carbondale IL 62901 USA

Department of Plant Ecophysiology Faculty of Agriculture University of Tabriz Tabriz 5166616471 Iran

College of Agronomy Sichuan Agricultural University Chengdu Sichuan 611130 China

Biobased Resources in the Bioeconomy (340b) Institute of Crop Science University of Hohenheim 70599 Stuttgart Germany

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.02010.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.020 ↗
2. 10.1016/bs.agron.2020.02.00410.1016/bs.agron.2020.02.004 ↗
3. 10.3390/su903034910.3390/su9030349 ↗
4. UN The future is now – Science for achieving sustainable development https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf(accessed: November2020).
5. 10.1002/sd.192310.1002/sd.1923 ↗
6. Q.Ketterings K.Czymmek Removal of phosphorus by field crops Agronomy Fact Sheet Series 2007.
7. M. L.Battaglia G.Groover W. E.Thomason Value and implications of corn stover removal from Virginia fields Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication CSES‐180 2017.
8. 10.1016/j.catena.2019.04.02810.1016/j.catena.2019.04.028 ↗
9. 10.2134/agronj2018.08.048310.2134/agronj2018.08.0483 ↗
10. 10.3390/agronomy1008108110.3390/agronomy10081081 ↗
11. 10.1080/10643389.2020.186256110.1080/10643389.2020.1862561 ↗
12. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.0110610.3389/fmicb.2019.01106 ↗
13. 10.3390/plants907090010.3390/plants9070900 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.07.00710.1016/j.sajb.2017.07.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.01110.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011 ↗
16. Sah S. · Biotech · 2017 · 7 · 121
17. Afshar R. K. · Agron. Soil Sci. Environ. Qual. · 2014 · 4 · 1212
18. 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.10895110.1016/j.scienta.2019.108951 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.24110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.241 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.14110.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.141 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.03810.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.038 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.imr.2018.01.00510.1016/j.imr.2018.01.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60075-110.1016/S2221-1691(13)60075-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.01510.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.015 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.01510.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.015 ↗
26. 10.3923/ajps.2011.323.33010.3923/ajps.2011.323.330 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.01.00710.1016/j.jssas.2016.01.007 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10705-018-9906-x10.1007/s10705-018-9906-x ↗
29. 10.1007/s42729-020-00290-210.1007/s42729-020-00290-2 ↗
30. 10.1007/s12517-020-05586-210.1007/s12517-020-05586-2 ↗
31. Jones J. B. · 1990
32. 10.1080/10408347.2012.75178710.1080/10408347.2012.751787 ↗
33. 10.2136/sssaj1968.03615995003200010012x10.2136/sssaj1968.03615995003200010012x ↗
34. 10.1007/s42729-020-00373-010.1007/s42729-020-00373-0 ↗
35. Adams R. P. · 2007
36. Rezaei‐Chiyaneh E. · Land Degrad. Dev. · 2021
37. Kormanik P. P. · 1982
38. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x ↗
39. 10.1017/S001447970001079610.1017/S0014479700010796 ↗
40. Gendy A. S. H. · Curr. Sci. Int. · 2018 · 7 · 387
41. 10.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.00110.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.001 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11356-014-3396-410.1007/s11356-014-3396-4 ↗
43. 10.3390/app1003094510.3390/app10030945 ↗
44. 10.3923/ja.2015.286.29110.3923/ja.2015.286.291 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.12.00410.1016/j.cropro.2014.12.004 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.00710.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.007 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.05.01510.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.05.015 ↗
48. 10.1007/s00203-019-01795-w10.1007/s00203-019-01795-w ↗
49. 10.3390/agronomy906029910.3390/agronomy9060299 ↗
50. 10.3390/plants902027910.3390/plants9020279 ↗
51. 10.3390/plants901008810.3390/plants9010088 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.00310.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.003 ↗
53. 10.1111/aab.1230910.1111/aab.12309 ↗
54. Rafiee H. · J. Med. Plants · 2016 · 15 · 6
55. El‐Serafya R. S. · Sci. Hortic. · 2020 · 265 · 109
56. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11803310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118033 ↗
57. 10.1186/s42269-018-0041-210.1186/s42269-018-0041-2 ↗
58. Reddy R. S. · Scholars J. Agric. Vet. Sci. · 2016 · 3 · 435
59. Shoghi‐Kalkhoran S. · J. Agric. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 15 · 1343
60. 10.17557/tjfc.47166610.17557/tjfc.471666 ↗
61. 10.1007/s11104-019-04110-010.1007/s11104-019-04110-0 ↗
62. 10.1016/B978-0-12-804312-7.00007-310.1016/B978-0-12-804312-7.00007-3 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.03810.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.038 ↗
64. Bolan N. S. · Plant Soil · 1991 · 134 · 187
65. 10.1038/srep0812210.1038/srep08122 ↗
66. 10.1371/journal.pone.021367210.1371/journal.pone.0213672 ↗
67. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.0048110.3389/fmicb.2019.00481 ↗
68. 10.1007/s00374-012-0682-510.1007/s00374-012-0682-5 ↗
69. Zarea M. J. · J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. · 2011 · 10 · 10910.1016/j.jssas.2011.04.003 ↗
70. 10.3390/agriculture907014210.3390/agriculture9070142 ↗
71. 10.1080/01448765.2021.190355610.1080/01448765.2021.1903556 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.eja.2019.02.00910.1016/j.eja.2019.02.009 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.20910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.209 ↗