journal article·2021-05Open access

Photocatalytic ZnO Foams for Micropollutant Degradation

Thais Tasso Guaraldo, Jannis Wenk, Davide Mattia

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 5· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Photocatalytic foams can concomitantly overcome the disadvantages of slurry and immobilized photocatalysts in water treatment. However, foams have, so far, been restricted to nanoparticles grafting onto inert foam substrates, with the consequent risk of nanoparticle release into the environment. In this work, self‐supporting, highly porous photocatalytic zinc oxide (ZnO) foams are produced using a combination of liquid templating and sintering for the first time. Systematic changes in sintering times and temperature affect the foams’ morphology and structure, in turn controlling their photocatalytic activity and stability. Sintering at 900 °C and decreasing sintering times from 20 to 6 h lead to a doubling in surface‐area‐to‐volume ratio and a 30% increase in pore diameter, resulting in a near doubling of the overall quantum yield and degradation kinetics. However, photocorrosion and Zn leaching increase markedly for the shortest sintering time. Optimal sintering conditions at 900 °C for 12 h yield foams capable of effectively degrading the model micropollutant carbamazepine under UV irradiation with high stability, showing no performance decrease over five irradiation cycles corresponding to 20 h of use. This study paves the way to producing self‐supporting, highly stable photocatalytic foams for the removal of organic micropollutants in water treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Membrane Separation Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering University of Bath Bath BA2 7AY UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · University of Bath

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.05810.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.058 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.04710.1016/j.watres.2016.02.047 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.00910.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.06610.1016/j.watres.2018.02.066 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.02910.1016/j.watres.2017.12.029 ↗
6. 10.2166/978178040144710.2166/9781780401447 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.02010.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.020 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12211410.1016/j.cej.2019.122114 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.08710.1016/j.cej.2017.05.087 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.05710.1016/j.cej.2015.08.057 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.05.01510.1016/j.cattod.2007.05.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.04610.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.046 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.00910.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.05910.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.059 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.12110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.121 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11356-011-0719-610.1007/s11356-011-0719-6 ↗
18. 10.1038/nbt0604-760c10.1038/nbt0604-760c ↗
19. b)UK Defra 2011 Characterising the Potential Risks posed by Engineered Nanoparticles https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69288/pb12901-nanoparticles-riskreport-071218.pdf.
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03534.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03534.x ↗
21. 10.1002/adem.20030038110.1002/adem.200300381 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00849.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00849.x ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20190053010.1002/anie.201900530 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.09.04610.1016/j.micromeso.2016.09.046 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.02.03110.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.02.031 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.04.03110.1016/j.polymer.2017.04.031 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.15310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.153 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.01610.1016/j.watres.2018.01.016 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.06110.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.061 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.04510.1016/j.watres.2015.09.045 ↗
31. WHO and Unicef 2017 Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation https://www.unwater.org/publications/whounicef-joint-monitoring-program-water-supply-sanitation-hygiene-jmp-2017-update-sdg-baselines/.
32. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12079910.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120799 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.11521010.1016/j.watres.2019.115210 ↗
34. 10.1039/c3cs60043b10.1039/c3cs60043b ↗
35. Randall M. G. · 2014
36. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.00990.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.00990.x ↗
37. 10.1021/jp311443s10.1021/jp311443s ↗
38. 10.1021/ja905270310.1021/ja9052703 ↗
39. 10.1039/C8EN01008K10.1039/C8EN01008K ↗
40. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.36810.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.368 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.01910.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.019 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.12.00810.1016/j.cattod.2012.12.008 ↗
43. 10.1039/C7CP07984B10.1039/C7CP07984B ↗
44. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.10410.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.104 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.08810.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.088 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.01410.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.014 ↗
47. 10.1021/jz502586p10.1021/jz502586p ↗
48. 10.1039/b108441k10.1039/b108441k ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0016110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.02310.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.023 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.03.03410.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.03.034 ↗
52. 10.1039/c3ta10218a10.1039/c3ta10218a ↗
53. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.02310.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.023 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.00510.1016/j.heares.2015.12.005 ↗
55. 10.3390/nano905067710.3390/nano9050677 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.09.03610.1016/j.watres.2018.09.036 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.03610.1016/j.watres.2012.03.036 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.04110.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.041 ↗
59. 10.1351/PAC-REC-09-09-3610.1351/PAC-REC-09-09-36 ↗