Decarbonization of the Electric Power Sector and Implications for Low‐Cost Hydrogen Production from Water Electrolysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Increasing development of wind and solar generation in the power sector can create economic opportunities for the deployment of water electrolyzers that produce hydrogen. Temporal variation in the marginal cost of energy in future decarbonized grids can make it favorable for electrolyzers to dispatchably ramp hydrogen production up and down in response to low‐ and high‐cost times. Using this strategy, low‐cost hydrogen production is enabled by electrolyzers that are low‐capital cost and tolerant to frequent on/off cycling. Ramping down hydrogen production to a designated turndown ratio can avoid performance degradation caused by on/off cycling by not shutting the electrolyzer completely off. This comes with a slight cost penalty which can be minimized if the turndown ratio is low (i.e., the system ramps down hydrogen production to close to zero). These results suggest that electrolyzers integrated into future power systems are likely to benefit from the ability to ramp operation up and down quickly and operate in a standby mode. This analysis forms a basis for comparative tradeoffs between electrolyzer capital cost, operating strategy, and system durability and demonstrates the importance of considering all three factors in technoeconomic analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Energy and Environment Impacts · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver W Parkway Golden CO 80401 USA
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. USGCRP 2018: Impacts Risks and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment Volume II: (Eds:D. R.Reidmiller C. W.Avery D. R.Easterling K. E.Kunkel K. L. M.Lewis T. K.Maycock B. C.Stewart) U.S. Global Change Research Program Washington DC USA 1515 pp.
2. Larson E. · 2021
3. U.S. EPA Greenhouse gas inventory data explorer United States Environmental Protection Agency 2020 https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/index.html(accessed: November 2022).
4. T. T.Mai P.Jadun J. S.Logan C. A.McMillan M.Muratori D. C.Steinberg L. J.Vimmersteadt H.Benjamin B.Haley R.Jones B.Nelson Electrification futures study: Scenarios of electric technology adoption and power consumption for the United States 2018 https://doi.org/10.2172/1459351.10.2172/1459351 ↗
5. Badgett A.
6. 10.1149/2.0231915jes10.1149/2.0231915jes ↗
7. U.S. EPA U.S. electricity grid & markets 2022 https://www.epa.gov/green‐power‐markets/us‐electricity‐grid‐markets(accessed: January 2023).
8. P.Gagnon M.Brown D.Steinberg P.Brown S.Awara V.Carag S.Cohen W.Cole J.Ho S.Inskeep N.Lee T.Mai M.Mowers C.Murphy B.Sergi 2022 Standard Scenarios Report: A U.S. Electricity Sector Outlook. Golden CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP‐6A40‐84327 https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/84327.pdf.
9. Cambium2022 https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/cambium.html(accessed: January 2023).
10. 10.2172/191525010.2172/1915250 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7EE03029K10.1039/C7EE03029K ↗
12. 10.1149/2.0421908jes10.1149/2.0421908jes ↗
13. A. T.Mayyas M. F.Ruth B. S.Pivovar G.Bender K. B.Wipke Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers.2019 https://doi.org/10.2172/1557965.10.2172/1557965 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.06310.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.063 ↗
15. Nel ASA: Official opening of the Herøya facility Proc. Cornell Int. Symp. Workshop Hydrogen Econ. 2022 https://nelhydrogen.com/press‐release/nel‐asa‐official‐opening‐of‐the‐heroya‐facility/(accessed: June 2023).
16. 10.1016/j.coche.2021.10071410.1016/j.coche.2021.100714 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.15110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.04310.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.043 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.117 ↗
20. 10.1016/0360-3199(94)90018-310.1016/0360-3199(94)90018-3 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.7b0807110.1021/jacs.7b08071 ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0151611jes10.1149/2.0151611jes ↗
23. H2A: Hydrogen Analysis Production Models https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/h2a‐production‐models.html(accessed: January 2023).
24. B.Pivovar M.Ruth R.Ahluwalia DOE Hydrogen Program 2022 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Washington D.C. United States https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review22/p196d_ruth_2022_p.pdf(accessed: 2023).
25. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.12018410.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120184 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.adapen.2021.10005110.1016/j.adapen.2021.100051 ↗
27. 10.2172/181994510.2172/1819945 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.10391510.1016/j.isci.2022.103915 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.02810.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.028 ↗
30. DOE Hydrogen Program 2022 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review22/plenary6_stetson_2022_o.pdf(accessed: 2023).
31. J.Seel A.Mills Integrating cambium marginal costs into electric sector decisions: Opportunities to integrate cambium marginal cost data into berkeley lab analysis and technical assistance 2021.10.2172/1828856 ↗
32. J.Vickers D.Peterson K.Randolph DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/20004-cost-electrolytic-hydrogen-production.pdf(accessed: 2023).
33. N.Stetson DOE Hydrogen Program 2022 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Washington D.C. United States 2022 https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review22/plenary6_stetson_2022_o.pdf(accessed: 2023).
34. B.Cowiestoll P.Gagnon M.Schwarz Scenario Viewer | Cambium 2022 https://scenarioviewer.nrel.gov/(accessed: January 2023).