journal article·2023-05Open access

Inverse Vulcanized Polymers for Sustainable Metal Remediation

Federico G. Müller, Lynn S. Lisboa, Justin M. Chalker

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 7· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Heavy metal exposure has an enormous burden on human health. Current metal removal technologies require substantial improvements in relation to their efficiency and environmental impact if this issue is to be addressed. Over the last decade, several new types of sulfur‐rich sorbents have been investigated. These polymers typically have high removal efficiencies for toxic metals such as mercury and are often made using sustainable and low‐cost reagents. This review surveys polymers made by inverse vulcanization that have been tested for metal capture. Focus is put on environmental impact, feedstock for sorbent synthesis, selectivity towards metal removal, toxicity studies, and the reusability of the polymers. Furthermore, this review discusses current limitations and the potential opportunities to use different comonomers for improved metal capture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Synthesis and properties of polymers · Conducting polymers and applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Sturt Road Bedford Park South Australia 5042 Australia

Funding

Australian Research Council

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. WHO Exposure and health impacts of air pollution https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/air-quality-and-health/health-impacts/exposure-air-pollution(accessed: January2023).
2. 10.1016/j.psep.2021.11.00810.1016/j.psep.2021.11.008 ↗
3. UN Environmental law https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/thematic-areas/land-property-environment/environmental-law (accessed: January2023).
4. 10.1093/bmb/ldg03210.1093/bmb/ldg032 ↗
5. 10.4236/wjns.2018.8201610.4236/wjns.2018.82016 ↗
6. UNEP Minamata Convention on Mercury http://www.mercuryconvention.org(accessed: January2023).
7. 10.1289/ehp.110479310.1289/ehp.1104793 ↗
8. b)EPA Lead laws and regulations https://www.epa.gov/lead/lead-laws-and-regulations(accessed: January2023).
9. EPA Chromium in drinking water https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/chromium-drinking-water(accessed: January2022).
10. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.10150410.1016/j.eti.2021.101504 ↗
11. 10.1038/nchem.162410.1038/nchem.1624 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7GC00014F10.1039/C7GC00014F ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.1c0932910.1021/jacs.1c09329 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-019-08430-810.1038/s41467-019-08430-8 ↗
15. 10.1002/pola.2926610.1002/pola.29266 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-022-32344-710.1038/s41467-022-32344-7 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41557-022-01049-110.1038/s41557-022-01049-1 ↗
18. 10.1039/C7RA11999B10.1039/C7RA11999B ↗
19. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b0050210.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00502 ↗
20. 10.1021/mz500678m10.1021/mz500678m ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20130560710.1002/adma.201305607 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b0060210.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00602 ↗
23. 10.1002/adsu.20180002410.1002/adsu.201800024 ↗
24. 10.1002/chem.20170287110.1002/chem.201702871 ↗
25. 10.1002/chem.20200184110.1002/chem.202001841 ↗
26. S.Tonkin L. N.Pham J.Gascooke M.Johnston C.Michelle C.Gibson J. M.Chalker ChemRxiv2022 https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-bzzd3.10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-bzzd3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12221610.1016/j.cej.2019.122216 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0025910.1021/acsapm.1c00259 ↗
29. 10.1039/D2PY00903J10.1039/D2PY00903J ↗
30. 10.1039/C6CC00938G10.1039/C6CC00938G ↗
31. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0681510.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06815 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.06910.1016/j.cej.2017.09.069 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6TA09862B10.1039/C6TA09862B ↗
34. 10.3390/polym807026610.3390/polym8070266 ↗
35. 10.1039/D2CP01903E10.1039/D2CP01903E ↗
36. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0072510.1021/acsapm.0c00725 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1303063210.3390/ma13030632 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11542010.1016/j.molliq.2021.115420 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.4530610.1002/app.45306 ↗
40. 10.1002/adsu.20190011110.1002/adsu.201900111 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.10486510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104865 ↗
42. 10.1039/C8RA04446E10.1039/C8RA04446E ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20150870810.1002/anie.201508708 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0020910.1021/acsapm.2c00209 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0153610.1021/acsapm.1c01536 ↗
46. 10.1039/D2PY00095D10.1039/D2PY00095D ↗
47. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11543710.1016/j.molliq.2021.115437 ↗
48. 10.1055/a-1502-261110.1055/a-1502-2611 ↗
49. 1996
50. 2017
51. UNEP · 2018
52. 10.1002/chem.20170484010.1002/chem.201704840 ↗
53. UNEP Mercury inventory toolkit https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/chemicals-waste/what-we-do/mercury/mercury-inventory-toolkit(accessed: January2023).
54. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.05.00210.1016/j.resourpol.2007.05.002 ↗
55. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac9f2610.1088/1748-9326/ac9f26 ↗
56. 10.1039/C9RA07607G10.1039/C9RA07607G ↗
57. 10.1021/ja00905a00110.1021/ja00905a001 ↗
58. 10.1007/BF0266717710.1007/BF02667177 ↗
59. M.Mann J. M.Chalker WO2020198778 A1 2019.
60. 10.1039/D0SC00855A10.1039/D0SC00855A ↗
61. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0426710.1021/acsomega.9b04267 ↗
62. 10.1002/macp.20170049710.1002/macp.201700497 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c0113810.1021/acs.biomac.1c01138 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13790510.1016/j.cej.2022.137905 ↗
65. 10.1039/D2TB00319H10.1039/D2TB00319H ↗
66. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10754610.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107546 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e0022210.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00222 ↗
68. 10.1021/jacs.2c1031710.1021/jacs.2c10317 ↗