journal article·2018-02

Hydrolytically Stable MOF in 3D‐Printed Structures

Oded Halevi, Joel M. R. Tan, Pooi See Lee, Shlomo Magdassi

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 2· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a well‐developed field of materials, having a high potential for various applications such as gas storage, water purification, and catalysis. Despite the continuous discoveries of new MOFs, so far there are only a limited number of industrial applications, partially due to their low chemical stability and limited mechanical properties, as well as difficulties in integration within functional devices, Herein, a new approach is presented toward the fabrication of MOF‐based devices, utilizing direct 3D printing. By this method, 3D, flexible, and hydrolytically stable MOF‐embedded polymeric structures are fabricated. It is found that the adsorption capacity of the 3D‐printed MOF is retained, with significantly improved hydrolytic stability of the printed MOFs (copper benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxylate) compared to the MOF only. It is expected that applying 3D printing technologies, for the fabrication of functional MOF objects such as filters and matrices for columns and flow reactors, will open the way for utilization of this important class of materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Casali Center of Applied Chemistry Institute of Chemistry The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem 91904 Israel

School of Materials Science and Engineering Nanyang Technological University Singapore 639798 Singapore

Funding

National Research Foundation Singapore

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.05.00510.1016/j.ccr.2015.05.005 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0053010.1021/acs.accounts.5b00530 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
4. 10.1021/jz501586e10.1021/jz501586e ↗
5. 10.1002/cjoc.20150076110.1002/cjoc.201500761 ↗
6. 10.1038/nchem.266110.1038/nchem.2661 ↗
7. 10.1038/nchem.265610.1038/nchem.2656 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5SC04368A10.1039/C5SC04368A ↗
9. 10.1021/ja211182m10.1021/ja211182m ↗
10. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.1810.1038/natrevmats.2015.18 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0020210.1021/acs.cgd.7b00202 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.5b0896410.1021/acsami.5b08964 ↗
13. 10.1039/C4CS00437J10.1039/C4CS00437J ↗
14. 10.1039/c3ta00927k10.1039/c3ta00927k ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20160339010.1002/adma.201603390 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aad268810.1126/science.aad2688 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ast.2016.12.01910.1016/j.ast.2016.12.019 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4LC00171K10.1039/C4LC00171K ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20140265410.1002/anie.201402654 ↗
20. 10.1002/ange.20140265410.1002/ange.201402654 ↗
21. 10.1038/nprot.2016.04110.1038/nprot.2016.041 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20150313210.1002/adma.201503132 ↗
23. 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-410.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0117910.1021/acsnano.5b01179 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20110492210.1002/adma.201104922 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.5b0630110.1021/acsami.5b06301 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20130162610.1002/adma.201301626 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20160443310.1002/adma.201604433 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6TA05389K10.1039/C6TA05389K ↗
30. 10.1038/srep0593910.1038/srep05939 ↗
31. 10.1038/nature2100310.1038/nature21003 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0290610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02906 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.11.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2008.11.020 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.04710.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.047 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.03510.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.035 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20150183310.1002/aenm.201501833 ↗
37. Chen J. · Water Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 63 · 163810.2166/wst.2011.303 ↗