Use of Acoustic Assessment to Detect Decay and Assess Condition of Wooden Guardrail Posts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Wood guardrail posts are the most common wood materials currently used in highway construction. Maintenance crews and engineers are often faced with the challenge of rapidly assessing the extent of decay or damage in individual posts. Many conventional intrusive techniques are unsuitable for inspecting guardrail posts because they are too time-consuming. Acoustic detection could be an ideal inspection method because of its rapid assessment. The potential for using acoustic inspection for wooden guardrail posts was assessed on treated hem-fir guardrail posts removed from western Washington State. The posts were tested nondestructively using an impulse hammer, and then increment cores were removed from each post for assessing preservative treatment and fungal colonization. The posts were then tested to failure in bending to determine flexural properties. All but one of the posts met the minimum threshold for strength according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. There was a weak correlation between acoustically predicted modulus of elasticity (MOE) and actual MOE. Correlations between acoustically predicted MOE and modulus of rupture were slightly better but still weak and lower than would be acceptable for this method to be used in the field. The results indicate that acoustic methods might be useful for detecting the presence of advanced decay but failed to provide definitive estimates of post properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Wood Treatment and Properties · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2007. Standard specification for wood products. M168. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2011. Roadside design guide. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
3. American Forest and Paper Association. 2015. National design specification for wood construction. American Forest and Paper Association, Washington, D.C.
4. American Wood Protection Association (AWPA). 2004a. Standard method for analysis of treated wood and treating solutions by x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Standard A9. AWPA, Birmingham, Alabama. pp. 282–286.
5. American Wood Protection Association (AWPA). 2004b. Wood densities for preservative retention calculations. Standard A12. AWPA, Birmingham, Alabama. pp. 291–292.
6. American Wood Protection Association (AWPA). 2014. Use category system: User specification for treated wood. Standard U1. AWPA, Birmingham, Alabama. 66 pp.
7. Beall, F. C. 2002. Overview of the use of ultrasonic techniques in research on wood properties. Wood Sci. Technol. 36:197–212.
8. Kretschmann, D. E. 2010. Mechanical properties of wood, chap. 5. In:US Department of Agriculture Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.
9. Love, C., M. Clauson, A. Sinha, and J. J.Morrell. 2014. Condition of chromated copper arsenate treated hem-fir guardrail post after 20 years in service in western Washington State. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 26(1):160–166.
10. Machek, L., H. Militz, and R.Sierra-Alvarez. 2001. The use of an acoustic technique to assess wood decay in laboratory soil-bed tests. Wood Sci. Technol. 34:467–472.
11. McGovern, M., A. Senalik, G. Chen, F. C. Beall, and H.Reis. 2010. Detection and assessment of wood decay using x-ray computer tomography. Paper 7647-152. SPIE Smart Structures Conference, March 7–11, 2010, San Diego, California.
12. Morrell, J. J. 2012. Wood pole maintenance manual. Research Contribution 51. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
13. Ross, R. J.and R. F.Pellerin. 1994. Nondestructive testing for assessing wood members in structures: A review. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-70 (Rev.). USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin. 40 pp.
14. Ross, R. J., X. Wang, and B. K.Brashaw. 2005. Detecting decay in wood components, chap. 5. In:Inspection and Monitoring Techniques for Bridges. G.Fu(Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
15. Senalik, A., M. McGovern, F. C. Beall, and H.Reis. 2013. Detection and assessment of decay in wooden utility poles using an acoustic approach. Int. J. Environ. Prot. 3(8):13–28.
16. Sinha, A., R. Gupta, and J. A.Nairn. 2011. Thermal degradation of the bending properties of structural wood and wood-based composites. Holzforschung65:221–229.
17. Titta, M. 2006. Non-destructive methods for characterization of wood material. PhD dissertation. University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
18. Yang, X. Y., Y. Ishimaru, I. Iida, and H.Urakami. 2002. Application of modal analysis by transfer function to nondestructive testing of wood I: Determination of localized defects in wood by the shape of the flexural vibration wave. J. Wood Sci. 48(4):283–288.