On the significance of transient heat release rate excursions above a set limit
Source abstract
Abstract
When a heat release rate limit for a consumer product is set by a regulatory agency, it is of interest to know whether small excursions above that limit, such as may occur due to production line variability, represent a disproportionate increase in fire hazard. This paper presents a methodology to examine this issue. The heat release rate curve of the object is described by a Gaussian time variation; a perturbation peak, also Gaussian, is added to this main peak. The impacts of the perturbation peak on the build up of hazardous conditions in a room fire (where the object is the only item burning) and on the threat of ignition of secondary items are examined. For the peak heat release rate domain studied here, only the ignition threat is significantly affected by the perturbation peak. The results quantify the trade-off between the height of the perturbation peak and its duration for a fixed percentage of increase in the room area threatened by secondary object ignition. The results show that the increased threat is of the same order as the relative perturbation in heat release rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. B. Sundstrom, (Ed.), CBUF. Fire Safety of Upholstered Furniture—The Final Report on the CBUF Research Programme, European Commission Measurements and Testing Report EUR 16477 EN, Interscience Communications, London, 1995.
2. T. Ohlemiller, Flammability Tests of Full-Scale Mattresses: Gas Burners versus Burning Bedclothes, National Institute of Standards and Technology NISTIR 7006, July 2003.10.6028/NIST.IR.7006 ↗
3. W.W. Jones, R.D. Peacock, G.P. Forney, P.A. Reneke, Verification and Validation of CFAST: A Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Spread, National Institute of Standards and Technology NISTIR 7080, February, 2004.10.6028/NIST.IR.7080 ↗
4. T. Ohlemiller, R. Gann, Estimating Reduced Risk Resulting From an Improved Mattress Flammability Standard, National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1446, August 2002.10.6028/NIST.TN.1446 ↗
5. Characteristics of fire scenarios in which sublethal effects of smoke are important10.1023/B:FIRE.0000016840.14947.61 ↗
6. Box · 1978
7. 2004
8. Radiation from large pool fires10.1177/104239158900100404 ↗
9. M. Bundy, T. Ohlemiller, Full-scale flammability measures for electronic equipment, National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1461, August 2004.10.6028/NIST.TN.1461 ↗
10. Defining flashover for hazard calculations: part II10.1016/S0379-7112(03)00027-4 ↗
11. Influence of delay times and response times on heat release rate measurements10.1002/1099-1018(200003/04)24:2<121::AID-FAM732>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
12. R. Bryant, T. Ohlemiller, R. Johnsson, A. Hamins, B. Grove, W. Guthrie, A. Maranghides, G. Mulholland, The NIST 3 megawatt quantitative heat release rate facility, NIST Special Publication 1007, November 2003.10.6028/NIST.SP.1007 ↗