Designing an experimental rig for developing a fire severity model using numerical simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Summary In this study, an experimental rig representing a deep enclosure was designed to be used to validate a CFD‐based fire model in predicting the outcome. The model then can be used for further study to investigate physical phenomenon within a deep enclosure and to develop an engineering fire severity (heat release rate, HRR, vs time vs position [1]) model. Two empirical models (the VU model [1] and Kawagoe model [2]) were used along with Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) in designing the experimental rig. For a specific‐sized enclosure, when the HRR was prescribed to the FDS as input from the VU model, it was accurately reproduced, while the HRR from the Kawagoe was used as the input, the FDS calculated much lower value. The experimental rig of that specific size was then built, and various parameters were measured from the tests with liquid fuel fire within this experimental rig. The measured HRR was prescribed into the FDS, and the FDS could reproduce HRR values well. However, the predicted temperature and radiation flux was not as good, especially when the flames were near the opening. This may be due to the tendency of flames over‐projecting outside the opening in FDS simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Fire effects on ecosystems · Combustion and Detonation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Environmental Safety and Risk Engineering Victoria University P.O. Box 14428 Melbourne Victoria 8001 Australia
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/fam.98610.1002/fam.986 ↗
2. 10.1080/10407782.2012.67736110.1080/10407782.2012.677361 ↗
3. Fires in enclosures with single ventilation openings ‐ comparison of long and wide enclosures
4. 10.1002/fam.112410.1002/fam.1124 ↗
5. ThomasIR et al.Fire resistance and non‐combustibility; evaluation of fire resistance levels: techniques data and results. Project Report FCRC‐PR 01–02 FCRC Project 3 Part 2 Australia 1999.
6. SFPE Task Group · 2004
7. Magnussion SE · 1970
8. 10.1016/0379-7112(92)90036-C10.1016/0379-7112(92)90036-C ↗
9. 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.8-127710.3801/IAFSS.FSS.8-1277 ↗
10. McGrattan K · 2014
11. McGrattan K · 2014
12. Kawagoe K · 1958
13. FeaseyR.Post‐flashover design fires Master thesis Department of Civil Engineering University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand 1999.
14. 10.1002/978111997546510.1002/9781119975465 ↗
15. ThomasPH HeseldenAJM.Fully developed fires in single compartments. A cooperative research programme of the conseil internationale du batiment.CIB Report No. 20 Fire Research Note 923 U.K. 1972.
16. 10.1177/104239150504730410.1177/1042391505047304 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.08.00110.1016/j.firesaf.2011.08.001 ↗
18. Incropera FP · 2006
19. IerardiJA BarnettJR.A quantitative method for calibrating CFD model calculations.Proceedings of the CIB‐CTBUH international conference on tall buildings CIB 2003 pp.507–514.