Percolation Theory Reveals Biophysical Properties of Virus-like Particles
Source abstract
Abstract
The viral protein containers that encapsulate a virus' genetic material are repurposed as virus-like particles in a host of nanotechnology applications, including cargo delivery, storage, catalysis, and vaccination. These viral architectures have evolved to sit on the knife's edge between stability, to provide adequate protection for their genetic cargoes, and instability, to enable their efficient and timely release in the host cell environment upon environmental cues. By introducing a percolation theory for viral capsids, we demonstrate that the geometric characteristics of a viral capsid in terms of its subunit layout and intersubunit interaction network are key for its disassembly behavior. A comparative analysis of all alternative homogeneously tiled capsid structures of the same stoichiometry identifies evolutionary drivers favoring specific viral geometries in nature and offers a guide for virus-like particle design in nanotechnology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bacteriophages and microbial interactions · Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Wolfram Research, Champaign, Illinois 61820, United States
VeriSIM Life, San Francisco, California 94104, United States
Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, United States
Departments of Mathematics and Biology, York Cross-disciplinary Centre for Systems Analysis, University of York, York YO10 5GE, U.K.
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Society · Wellcome Trust · Wolfram Research
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.03.01310.1016/j.cbpa.2017.03.013 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0604910.1021/acsnano.7b06049 ↗
3. 10.1038/3021110.1038/30211 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.112322310.1126/science.1123223 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.04510.1016/j.ces.2014.09.045 ↗
6. Mateu M. G. · 2016 · 8310.1007/978-3-319-39196-0_5 ↗
7. 10.1002/pro.326510.1002/pro.3265 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0016610.1021/acsabm.9b00166 ↗
9. 10.1529/biophysj.104.04005510.1529/biophysj.104.040055 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.06192810.1103/PhysRevE.71.061928 ↗
11. 10.1529/biophysj.105.07297510.1529/biophysj.105.072975 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.02240810.1103/PhysRevE.94.022408 ↗
13. 10.1021/bm100877q10.1021/bm100877q ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.05570110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.055701 ↗
15. 10.1038/177473a010.1038/177473a0 ↗
16. 10.1101/SQB.1962.027.001.00510.1101/SQB.1962.027.001.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.10.00610.1016/j.jtbi.2003.10.006 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-019-12367-310.1038/s41467-019-12367-3 ↗
19. 10.1088/1478-3975/aac19410.1088/1478-3975/aac194 ↗
20. 10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-05514110.1146/annurev-virology-100114-055141 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.27510.1103/PhysRevE.60.275 ↗
22. 10.1088/1751-8113/40/31/00510.1088/1751-8113/40/31/005 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.170421510.1063/1.1704215 ↗
24. 10.1088/0305-4470/30/15/02110.1088/0305-4470/30/15/021 ↗
25. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.147310.1006/jmbi.1994.1473 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.04.02310.1016/j.jtbi.2006.04.023 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.07.00410.1016/j.jmb.2014.07.004 ↗
28. 10.1039/C0JM02592E10.1039/C0JM02592E ↗
29. 10.1038/nnano.2012.22010.1038/nnano.2012.220 ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms544510.1038/ncomms5445 ↗
31. 10.1038/nchem.59210.1038/nchem.592 ↗
32. Brunk N. E. · 2019
33. 10.1016/j.ica.2010.08.00710.1016/j.ica.2010.08.007 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.05191010.1103/PhysRevE.68.051910 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.06191510.1103/PhysRevE.73.061915 ↗
36. 10.1038/nphys179710.1038/nphys1797 ↗
37. 10.1128/JVI.00123-1710.1128/JVI.00123-17 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.04410.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.044 ↗
39. 10.1073/pnas.180770611510.1073/pnas.1807706115 ↗
40. 10.1073/pnas.141398611110.1073/pnas.1413986111 ↗
41. 10.1039/C9TB01003C10.1039/C9TB01003C ↗