journal article·2020-09-01

Hydroxyl Changing Mechanism of Cotton Cellulose during Alkaline Treatment Characterized by ATR-FTIR in Combination with Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy

Bolin Ji, Zijing Cai, Gang Sun, Kelu Yan

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 7· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Hydroxyl changes of cotton cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution is closely related with hydrogen bonding (H-bonds) between different hydroxyls, which is difficult to directly measure by common instrumentational methods of X-ray diffraction (XRD) or Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy (2Dcos) is a powerful tool to analyze the changes of molecular spectroscopy. In this study, the alkaline-treated cotton cellulose was monitored in real time by attenuated total reflection (ATR) in combination with 2Dcos. Results indicated that the H-bonds changed in the following sequence order: v(O3-H3…O5) (intramolecular) → v(O6-H6…O3′) (intermolecular) → v(O2-H2…O6) (intramolecular). Moreover, Gaussian computational modeling analysis also confirmed this mechanism. Both XRD and FTIR results indicated the decrease of crystallinity of the alkaline-treated cotton cellulose over prolonged time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Donghua University

University of California, Davis

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/004051751348385710.1177/0040517513483857 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10570-016-1012-010.1007/s10570-016-1012-0 ↗
3. Krässig H. A. · In Cellulose: Structure, Accessibility and Reactivity, Polymer Monographs · 1993 · 11 · 123
4. 10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.00710.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007 ↗
5. 10.1002/cssc.20140275210.1002/cssc.201402752 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.05.03310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.05.033 ↗
7. Yan K. · Process and Principle of Dyeing & Finishing · 2009 · 1 · 236
8. Nakamura A. · 2000
9. Cai Z. Fiber Chemistry and Physics; China Textile & Apparel Press: Beijing, China, 2009; pp 155–193.
10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.01710.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017 ↗
11. 10.14504/ajr.4.4.410.14504/ajr.4.4.4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.28510.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.285 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.07010.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.070 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja00203a00810.1021/ja00203a008 ↗
15. 10.1021/bm060359110.1021/bm0603591 ↗
16. 10.1021/bm700678u10.1021/bm700678u ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.00510.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.005 ↗
18. 10.1021/ma071630p10.1021/ma071630p ↗
19. 10.1021/ma302237610.1021/ma3022376 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10570-014-0458-110.1007/s10570-014-0458-1 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10570-019-02255-w10.1007/s10570-019-02255-w ↗
22. 10.1366/00037020677659369010.1366/000370206776593690 ↗
23. Laane J. · 2018 · 47
24. 10.1007/s10570-015-0810-010.1007/s10570-015-0810-0 ↗
25. 10.1039/B301416A10.1039/B301416A ↗
26. Ning Y. C. Structural Identification of Organic Compounds and Organic Spectroscopy, 2nd ed. Science Press: Beijing, China, 2000; pp 493–494.
27. 10.1002/app.1985.07030012810.1002/app.1985.070300128 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.1987.07033031510.1002/app.1987.070330315 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.abb.2015.10.01610.1016/j.abb.2015.10.016 ↗