journal article·2019-03

Hybrid Loss‐Compensated Plasmonic Device

Fatemeh Hosseini Alast, Mohsen Nikkhah, Xiao Li, Jack Ng, Amirhossein B. Ghasemi, Hamid Latifi, Kok Wai Cheah

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 7· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Here it is studied how the active medium affects the Rabi‐analog splitting when an active plasmonic microcavity mode is coupled to a surface plasmon polariton mode. The incorporation of Rubrene‐like molecules in the plasmonic microcavity results in stronger modal coupling. Anticrossing is observed with a large Rabi‐analog splitting energy of 280 meV in the strong coupling regime. The active medium contributes to the split enhancement through channeling more energy toward the coupling. The variation of photoluminescence emission and exciton‐cavity mode coupling from the hybrid plasmonic microcavity are also measured. This work shows that by introducing an active medium in the microcavity, mode coupling between microcavity and surface plasmon polariton can be enhanced and the hybrid plasmonic device exhibits parity–time symmetry characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Strong Light-Matter Interactions · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics Institute of Advanced Materials and Institute of Computational and Theoretical Studies Hong Kong Baptist University Kowloon Tong Hong Kong China

Department of Physics Shahid Beheshti University G. C. Evin Tehran Iran

Funding

Glaucoma Research Foundation

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/CBO978051181353510.1017/CBO9780511813535 ↗
2. 10.1021/nl101940810.1021/nl1019408 ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms148710.1038/ncomms1487 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl901682n10.1021/nl901682n ↗
5. 10.1002/lpor.20110004110.1002/lpor.201100041 ↗
6. 10.1088/0034-4885/78/1/01390110.1088/0034-4885/78/1/013901 ↗
7. 10.1002/adom.20130025610.1002/adom.201300256 ↗
8. 10.1039/c3nr02862c10.1039/c3nr02862c ↗
9. Zhang Z. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 19
10. 10.1021/jp506091k10.1021/jp506091k ↗
11. 10.1038/2569210.1038/25692 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.05.00510.1016/j.orgel.2006.05.005 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12531710.1103/PhysRevB.81.125317 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.18640410.1103/PhysRevLett.93.186404 ↗
15. 10.1021/nn101973p10.1021/nn101973p ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0251210.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02512 ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.21.02136510.1364/OE.21.021365 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0497410.1021/acsnano.5b04974 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20100126210.1002/adfm.201001262 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.416210.1103/PhysRevB.53.4162 ↗
21. Ding K. · Phys. Rev. X · 2016 · 6 · 021007
22. 10.1063/1.499671510.1063/1.4996715 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b0262510.1021/acs.jpca.6b02625 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0029510.1021/acs.accounts.6b00295 ↗