journal article·2021-02Open access

Non‐Local Reconfigurable Sparse Metasurface: Efficient Near‐Field and Far‐Field Wavefront Manipulations

Vladislav Popov, Badreddine Ratni, Shah Nawaz Burokur, Fabrice Boust

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 9· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, metasurfaces have shown extremely powerful abilities for manipulation of electromagnetic waves. However, the local electromagnetic response of conventional metasurfaces yields an intrinsic performance limitation in terms of efficiency, minimizing their implementation in real‐life applications. The efficiency of reconfigurable metasurfaces further decreases because of the high density of meta‐atoms, reaching 74 meta‐atoms per λ2 area, incorporating lossy tunable elements. To address these problems, strong electromagnetic non‐local features are implemented in a sparse metasurface composed of electronically reconfigurable meta‐atoms. As a proof‐of‐concept demonstration, a dynamic sparse metasurface having as few as 8 meta‐atoms per λ2 area is experimentally realized in the microwave domain to control 2D wavefronts in both near‐field and far‐field regions for focusing and beam‐forming, respectively. The proposed metasurface with its sparsity not only facilitates design and fabrication, but also opens the door to high‐efficiency real‐time reprogrammable functionalities in beam manipulations, wireless power transfer, and imaging holography.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Antenna Design and Analysis · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

SONDRA CentraleSupélec Université Paris‐Saclay F‐91190 Gif‐sur‐Yvette France

LEME UPL Univ Paris Nanterre F‐92410 Ville d'Avray France

DEMR ONERA Université Paris‐Saclay F‐91123 Palaiseau France

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TAP.2003.81755810.1109/TAP.2003.817558 ↗
2. 10.1109/TAP.2012.221305410.1109/TAP.2012.2213054 ↗
3. 10.1109/TAP.2013.227149310.1109/TAP.2013.2271493 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep0472810.1038/srep04728 ↗
5. 10.1038/lsa.2014.9910.1038/lsa.2014.99 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat408210.1038/nmat4082 ↗
7. 10.1038/srep0669310.1038/srep06693 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20150194310.1002/adma.201501943 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.01770110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.017701 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep2750310.1038/srep27503 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep3569210.1038/srep35692 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep2373110.1038/srep23731 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep3825510.1038/srep38255 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.13430210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.134302 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.496743810.1063/1.4967438 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20160642210.1002/adma.201606422 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-017-00164-910.1038/s41467-017-00164-9 ↗
18. 10.1364/OE.26.00261310.1364/OE.26.002613 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-018-24681-910.1038/s41598-018-24681-9 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0134310.1021/acsphotonics.7b01343 ↗
21. Hougne P. · Phys. Rev. X · 2018 · 8 · 041037
22. 10.1038/s41377-019-0209-z10.1038/s41377-019-0209-z ↗
23. 10.1038/s41377-019-0205-310.1038/s41377-019-0205-3 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.04402410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044024 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41928-018-0190-110.1038/s41928-018-0190-1 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20191025910.1002/adfm.201910259 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.03400610.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.034006 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.10030410.1103/PhysRevB.92.100304 ↗
29. 10.1093/nsr/nwy13510.1093/nsr/nwy135 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467-018-06802-010.1038/s41467-018-06802-0 ↗
31. Liu M. · Phys. Rev. X · 2018 · 8 · 031077
32. 10.1088/1367-2630/aaf47a10.1088/1367-2630/aaf47a ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.04700110.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.047001 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.05405410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.054054 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.05400810.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054008 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.01402410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014024 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.02301410.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.023014 ↗
38. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.24710.1038/nphoton.2015.247 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0055510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00555 ↗
40. 10.1002/adfm.20180669210.1002/adfm.201806692 ↗
41. He Q. · Research · 2019 · 2019 · 1849272
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.19740110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.197401 ↗
43. 10.1109/TAP.2014.235441910.1109/TAP.2014.2354419 ↗
44. 10.1038/ncomms1036010.1038/ncomms10360 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.07514210.1103/PhysRevB.94.075142 ↗
46. 10.1109/TAP.2016.258849510.1109/TAP.2016.2588495 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.25610310.1103/PhysRevLett.117.256103 ↗
48. Mohammadi Estakhri N. · Phys. Rev. X · 2016 · 6 · 041008
49. 10.1109/TAP.2003.81756010.1109/TAP.2003.817560 ↗
50. 10.1364/JOSAB.33.000A3110.1364/JOSAB.33.000A31 ↗
51. 10.1126/sciadv.160271410.1126/sciadv.1602714 ↗
52. 10.1109/LAWP.2018.283629910.1109/LAWP.2018.2836299 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.06740410.1103/PhysRevLett.119.067404 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.05403710.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.054037 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.02407410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.024074 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.01103610.1103/PhysRevX.8.011036 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.01100210.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.011002 ↗
58. 10.1109/TAP.2019.295149210.1109/TAP.2019.2951492 ↗
59. 10.1109/TAP.2019.295772910.1109/TAP.2019.2957729 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.04400710.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.044007 ↗
61. Kennedy J. · 1995 · 1942
62. Oppenheim A. V. · 1989
63. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.04405410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044054 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.12510110.1103/PhysRevB.99.125101 ↗
65. 10.1109/TAP.2019.295081310.1109/TAP.2019.2950813 ↗
66. EFS‐105‐12 Fiber Optic Probe http://www.enprobe.de/products.htm(accessed: December 2020).
67. 10.1007/BF0295617310.1007/BF02956173 ↗
68. 10.1017/CBO978051179419310.1017/CBO9780511794193 ↗
69. 10.1002/adma.20170455610.1002/adma.201704556 ↗
70. Balanis C. A. · 2016
71. 10.1002/adom.20160029710.1002/adom.201600297 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0152810.1021/acsphotonics.7b01528 ↗
73. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0176710.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01767 ↗