journal article·2024-08Open access

1D Topological Interface States for Improving Optical Sensors

Jakob Lindenthal, Anton Widulla, Sebastian Klembt, Johannes Benduhn, Karl Leo

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 12· Issue 23

Abstract

Abstract The field of compact optical microcavities has received significant research in the past decades, and a broad range of cavity‐based micromechanical sensors has been demonstrated. The present approach replaces the frequently employed, complex etched cantilever and membrane structures with a simple thin‐film system based on a compressible photonic microcavity to achieve pressure‐sensitive wavelength shifting of resonant modes. The effects of a topological dielectric mirror architecture on the light propagation in the system are extensively investigated. Topologically improved light‐matter interaction is experimentally demonstrated for systems where thin‐film devices are mounted on one side of the photonic cavity due to mechanical constraints. Coupled topological states are examined under the aspect of mode splitting and exhibit advantageous splitting tunability compared to non‐topological systems. The findings are complemented by the proposal of a simple spectral evaluation method allowing significant improvement in the precision of integrated Fabry‐Pérot sensors. The readout concept of the presented sensor allows a scalable improvement of the measurement precision by evaluating the resonant‐mode order in the deformable cavity. The experimental results and conceptual advancements provide pathways for significant improvements addressing the efficiency of light‐matter interaction in Fabry‐Pérot cavities and the readout precision of sensors incorporating thin‐film photodiodes in multimode photonic cavities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dresden Integrated Center for Applied Physics and Photonic Materials (IAPP) and Institute of Applied Physics TU Dresden Nöthnitzer Str. 61 01187 Dresden Germany

Würzburg University Chair of Technical Physics Am Hubland 97074 Würzburg Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.46670/JSST.2023.32.1.2210.46670/JSST.2023.32.1.22 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12898110.1016/j.snb.2020.128981 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.239888510.1063/1.2398885 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0806110.1038/nature08061 ↗
5. Guo M. · IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measur. · 2021 · 70 · 1
6. 10.1364/OE.45176410.1364/OE.451764 ↗
7. 10.1016/0924-4247(96)80098-710.1016/0924-4247(96)80098-7 ↗
8. 10.1002/admt.20210011810.1002/admt.202100118 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0110910.1021/acsphotonics.0c01109 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.79210.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.792 ↗
11. 10.1364/OE.46207010.1364/OE.462070 ↗
12. 10.1109/SENSOR.1997.63574210.1109/SENSOR.1997.635742 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11223110.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112231 ↗
14. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-002810.1515/ntrev-2019-0028 ↗
15. 10.1038/nature0193910.1038/nature01939 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.11.09710.1016/j.optcom.2011.11.097 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20210296710.1002/adma.202102967 ↗
18. 10.1002/adom.20200178410.1002/adom.202001784 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.04.02810.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.04.028 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.optcom.2021.12758010.1016/j.optcom.2021.127580 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.11.01010.1016/j.jmst.2019.11.010 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.489641510.1063/1.4896415 ↗
23. 10.1002/polb.2397210.1002/polb.23972 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00216005041610.1007/s002160050416 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02272.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02272.x ↗
26. 10.1017/CBO978051180379610.1017/CBO9780511803796 ↗
27. 10.1088/0963-9659/4/5/01810.1088/0963-9659/4/5/018 ↗
28. 10.1017/CBO978131668710910.1017/CBO9781316687109 ↗
29. Xiao M. · Phys. Rev. X · 2014 · 4
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.15542210.1103/PhysRevB.97.155422 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.08541210.1103/PhysRevB.103.085412 ↗
32. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-011410.1515/nanoph-2021-0114 ↗
33. M.Tang J.Wang S.Valligatla C. N.Saggau H.Dong E. S. G.Naz S.Klembt C. H.Lee R.Thomale J.van denBrink I. C.Fulga O. G.Schmidt L.Ma Arxiv2023 4 2300113.10.1002/adpr.202300113 ↗
34. P. O. of Devices S. L. Chuang Wiley New York1995.
35. 10.1103/PhysRev.120.82010.1103/PhysRev.120.820 ↗
36. M.Jain A.Gupta R.Gupta Landolt-Börnstein ‐ 2379 Diamagnetic susceptibility of O2Si in Group II Molecules and Radicals 27A Diamagnetic Susceptibility and Anisotropy of Inorganic and Organometallic Compounds bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg 2007.10.1007/978-3-540-44694-1_2380 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRev.92.132410.1103/PhysRev.92.1324 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRev.144.58210.1103/PhysRev.144.582 ↗
39. 10.1021/ph400044k10.1021/ph400044k ↗
40. Marcuse D. · 1974
41. C.‐H.Wu P. C.‐P.Chao Y.‐C.Wu T.Sauter H.‐W.Zan IEEE Sensors2017.
42. 10.1109/TMTT.2015.243437710.1109/TMTT.2015.2434377 ↗
43. 10.1039/D1MH01215K10.1039/D1MH01215K ↗
44. Budynas R. G. · 2011
45. 10.1007/978-0-387-49799-010.1007/978-0-387-49799-0 ↗
46. S. J.Byrnes Arxiv2021 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.02720.
47. 10.3390/polym1307114110.3390/polym13071141 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.mee.2010.12.10810.1016/j.mee.2010.12.108 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10667010.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106670 ↗