Ultrathin Capacitive Metasurfaces for Strong Electric Response
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultrathin capacitive metasurfaces, comprising nonresonant metal strips or patches, are shown to cause exceptionally large phase discontinuity of incoming light. The strong electric response in metasurfaces leading to phase discontinuity is demonstrated experimentally and characterized using effective medium theory. Without needing resonant optical scatterers, these metasurfaces enable deep subwavelength planar photonics. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics Korea University 45 Anam‐ro Seongbuk‐guSeoul 136‐701 Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning · Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl302516v10.1021/nl302516v ↗
2. 10.1038/lsa.2013.2810.1038/lsa.2013.28 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.125321310.1126/science.1253213 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.aaa249410.1126/science.aaa2494 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms380810.1038/ncomms3808 ↗
6. Ni X. · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 1
7. 10.1038/nnano.2015.210.1038/nnano.2015.2 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.02390210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.023902 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20120262410.1002/adma.201202624 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.23300110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.233001 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20140156110.1002/adfm.201401561 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aac941110.1126/science.aac9411 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.123175810.1126/science.1231758 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.123489210.1126/science.1234892 ↗
15. 10.1109/MAP.2012.623071410.1109/MAP.2012.6230714 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.metmat.2011.05.00110.1016/j.metmat.2011.05.001 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.23512710.1103/PhysRevB.90.235127 ↗
18. 10.1364/OE.24.00712010.1364/OE.24.007120 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.00410.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.004 ↗
20. 10.1109/22.79800210.1109/22.798002 ↗
21. 10.1038/nature0424210.1038/nature04242 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.110537110.1126/science.1105371 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.418410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.105884710.1126/science.1058847 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.112602110.1126/science.1126021 ↗
26. 10.1038/nature0724710.1038/nature07247 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.346992510.1063/1.3469925 ↗
28. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.25610.1038/nphoton.2013.256 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.07740510.1103/PhysRevLett.90.077405 ↗
30. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24310.1038/nphoton.2013.243 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.19740110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.197401 ↗
32. 10.1109/JSTQE.2006.87957710.1109/JSTQE.2006.879577 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.08541810.1103/PhysRevB.71.085418 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ssc.2011.06.02210.1016/j.ssc.2011.06.022 ↗
35. Romero‐Bermúdez A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 1
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.22390110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.223901 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.04513110.1103/PhysRevB.75.045131 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.09390610.1103/PhysRevLett.102.093906 ↗
39. 10.1109/TIM.1970.431393210.1109/TIM.1970.4313932 ↗
40. 10.1109/PROC.1974.938210.1109/PROC.1974.9382 ↗
41. 10.1109/TMTT.1979.112977810.1109/TMTT.1979.1129778 ↗