journal article·2026-04Open access

Photonics of Topological Magnetic Textures

Vakhtang Jandieri, Ramaz Khomeriki, Daniel Erni, Nicolas Tsagareli, Qian Li, Douglas H. Werner, Jamal Berakdar

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 14· Issue 13

Abstract

Abstract Topological textures in magnetically ordered materials are an important case studies for fundamental research with promising applications in data science. They can also serve as photonic elements to mold electromagnetic fields endowing them with features inherent to the spin order, as demonstrated analytically and numerically in this work. A self‐consistent theory is developed for the interaction of spatially structured electromagnetic fields with non‐collinear, topologically non‐trivial spin textures. A tractable numerical method is designed and implemented for the calculation of the formed magnetic/photonic textures in the entire simulation space. Numerical illustrations are presented for scattering from point‐like singularities, i.e. Bloch points, in the magnetization vector fields, evidencing that the geometry and topology of the magnetic order results in photonic fields that embody orbital angular momentum, chirality as well as magnetoelectric densities. Features of the scattered fields can serve as a fingerprint for the underlying magnetic texture and its dynamics. The findings point to the potential of topological magnetic textures as a route to molding photonic fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut für Physik Martin‐Luther Universität 06099 Halle Germany

General and Theoretical Electrical Engineering (ATE), Faculty of Engineering University of Duisburg‐Essen, and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg‐Essen (CENIDE) D‐47048 Duisburg Germany

Physics Department Tbilisi State University Tbilisi 0128 Georgia

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Binghamton University State University of New York Binghamton NY NY 13902 USA

State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China

Department of Electrical Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA PA 16802 USA

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Basic Energy Sciences · Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Skyrme T. H. R. · Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci · 1961 · 260 · 127
2. 10.1007/BF0039848310.1007/BF00398483 ↗
3. 10.1016/0375-9601(80)90627-110.1016/0375-9601(80)90627-1 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.10051210.1103/PhysRevB.65.100512 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.204010.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2040 ↗
6. 10.1051/jphys:0197800390808630010.1051/jphys:01978003908086300 ↗
7. 10.1016/0370-1573(90)90130-T10.1016/0370-1573(90)90130-T ↗
8. 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90049-710.1016/0375-9601(88)90049-7 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0040186410.1007/BF00401864 ↗
10. 10.1016/0304-8853(94)90046-910.1016/0304-8853(94)90046-9 ↗
11. R.Rajaraman Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory Elsevier 1982.
12. 10.1038/nature0505610.1038/nature05056 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.116676710.1126/science.1166767 ↗
14. 10.1038/nature0912410.1038/nature09124 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.121414310.1126/science.1214143 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.124057310.1126/science.1240573 ↗
17. 10.1038/nature1646310.1038/nature16463 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-021-21846-510.1038/s41467-021-21846-5 ↗
19. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.4410.1038/natrevmats.2016.44 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41566-023-01325-710.1038/s41566-023-01325-7 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41928-020-0461-510.1038/s41928-020-0461-5 ↗
22. Feldtkeller E. · Z. Elektrochem. Angew. Phys. · 1965 · 19 · 530
23. 10.1063/1.165614410.1063/1.1656144 ↗
24. Kabanov Y. P. · JETP Lett. · 1989 · 49 · 10
25. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/48/48300210.1088/0953-8984/28/48/483002 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.17720210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.177202 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.02443310.1103/PhysRevB.99.024433 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.09441010.1103/PhysRevB.67.094410 ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms919610.1038/ncomms9196 ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms1162210.1038/ncomms11622 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-019-08327-610.1038/s41467-019-08327-6 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-022-31335-y10.1038/s41467-022-31335-y ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.03300610.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033006 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41565-022-01311-010.1038/s41565-022-01311-0 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.02441410.1103/PhysRevB.108.024414 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-023-34167-y10.1038/s41598-023-34167-y ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.4c0196310.1021/acsami.4c01963 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.22441410.1103/PhysRevB.90.224414 ↗
39. Topology and geometry of BP:Considering a closed surface enclosing the BP at its center the direction of unit magnetization vector field (m0in Equation 4) covers an integer number of times a whole solid angle. Expressed in spherical coordinates [23]this vector field is parameterized by a polar component expressible aspθ and an azimuthal component written asqϕ + γ. Sincem0is single valued qandpare integer number and the topological nature of the BP is then set by the quantityQ=pq called the topological charge.[11]γ determines the geometry: It is an azimuthal tilt with regard to the radial direction causing the BP to twist aroundz as discussed in the text and shown in Figure 3. Such as behavior and how the system goes from oneq pstate to another is illustrated for example in [40] for vortices and skyrmions using micromagnetic simulations. The discussions and numerical calculations presented in this work assume a specific γ. The actual value of γ for a given material depends on terms in the magneto‐static energy such as the dipolar energy [23]that are not in the focus of this work.
40. 10.1088/2040-8986/ab4f8e10.1088/2040-8986/ab4f8e ↗
41. Energy scale: In the region around the BP the dominant energy contribution stems from exchange energy∫d3rJ2a(∇S)$\int d^3\mathbf {r} \frac{J}{2a} (\nabla \mathbf {S})$ whereJis the exchange interaction ais the lattice constant and ℏSis the molecular spin which is proportional to the magnetizationMappearing in (2). The energy scale is typically an order of magnitude higher than that due to dipolar interactions which govern magneto‐static excitations (spin waves) in uniform magnetic media.
42. 10.1364/AOP.1.00000110.1364/AOP.1.000001 ↗
43. 10.1088/2040-8986/aaeb7d10.1088/2040-8986/aaeb7d ↗
44. 10.1080/23746149.2020.173695010.1080/23746149.2020.1736950 ↗
45. 10.3389/fphy.2021.68828410.3389/fphy.2021.688284 ↗
46. 10.1002/978111966294510.1002/9781119662945 ↗
47. Kozawa Y. · Photonics Review · 2025 · 2025
48. 10.1038/s41377-025-01859-110.1038/s41377-025-01859-1 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.15670110.1103/PhysRevLett.134.156701 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.15720510.1103/PhysRevLett.128.157205 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41566-022-01022-x10.1038/s41566-022-01022-x ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00115 ↗
53. 10.1088/2040-8978/16/12/12520110.1088/2040-8978/16/12/125201 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41566-020-0669-y10.1038/s41566-020-0669-y ↗
55. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-019810.1515/nanoph-2019-0198 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.01350110.1103/PhysRevA.103.013501 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.07740110.1103/PhysRevLett.128.077401 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.02690210.1103/PhysRevLett.132.026902 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41598-018-35378-410.1038/s41598-018-35378-4 ↗
60. 10.1002/qute.20180009610.1002/qute.201800096 ↗
61. 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.03500310.1103/RevModPhys.94.035003 ↗
62. 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.01500610.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006 ↗
63. 10.1038/nature0829310.1038/nature08293 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.15670110.1103/PhysRevLett.134.156701 ↗
65. M.Luttmann M.Fanciulli P.Carrara M.Sacchi T.Ruchon arXiv preprint2025 arXiv:2506.15232.
66. 10.1063/5.027479910.1063/5.0274799 ↗
67. 10.1063/5.022912010.1063/5.0229120 ↗
68. 10.1021/acsami.4c0236610.1021/acsami.4c02366 ↗
69. 10.1038/s42005-023-01318-610.1038/s42005-023-01318-6 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.13440310.1103/PhysRevB.107.134403 ↗
71. 10.1038/s41567-023-02175-410.1038/s41567-023-02175-4 ↗
72. 10.1038/s41467-024-54991-810.1038/s41467-024-54991-8 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.12760110.1103/PhysRevLett.127.127601 ↗
74. 10.1140/epjb/e2011-20146-610.1140/epjb/e2011-20146-6 ↗
75. Directly at the BP where the magnetization vanishes (cf. Figure 1) atomistic models are needed. The theory presented here does not include this particular point. A reasonable length beyond which our model is expected to hold is set by the exchange lengthJ/(Ms2a)$\sqrt {J/(M_s^2 a)}$ the value of this length is ≈6 nm for Permalloy. Since our focus is not on describing BPs as such but on the behavior of the EM fields scattering from BPs and the fields do not scatter whenMs= 0 this issue is less critical for this study.
76. 10.1038/s41598-023-33998-z10.1038/s41598-023-33998-z ↗
77. Our formulation based on Equations (1 2) captures the physics of BPs. It does not include the magnetic material well beyond BP. This part enters our theory/simulations through a finite but constant relative permeability. Field matching is performed between the BP region and the surrounding rendering the EM fields well‐defined in the whole space. Note typically the response of the exchange‐dominated BP is at a different (higher) frequency than the magneto‐statically‐coupled region with a response in the GHz. Mathematically this means that within our formulation and boundary conditions we cannot realize BP as localized solutions in a vector field which is spatially homogeneous meaning collinear at infinity.
78. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0169310.1021/acsphotonics.1c01693 ↗
79. 10.1109/22.61840710.1109/22.618407 ↗
80. 10.1163/156939397X0016110.1163/156939397X00161 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.12760110.1103/PhysRevLett.127.127601 ↗
82. 10.1364/OE.18.00717310.1364/OE.18.007173 ↗
83. 10.1364/AOP.54763410.1364/AOP.547634 ↗
84. 10.1038/s41377-024-01708-710.1038/s41377-024-01708-7 ↗
85. 10.1038/s41377-024-01659-z10.1038/s41377-024-01659-z ↗
86. 10.1364/OE.48961210.1364/OE.489612 ↗
87. 10.1109/TAP.2019.289428010.1109/TAP.2019.2894280 ↗
88. V.Jandieri K.Yasumoto Ch. 21 in book: “Advances in Mathematical Methods for Electromagnetics ” Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) 2020.
89. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.04542810.1103/PhysRevB.109.045428 ↗
90. R. F.Harrington Time‐Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields 2001.10.1109/9780470546710 ↗
91. 10.1364/OE.50721610.1364/OE.507216 ↗
92. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.03360110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.033601 ↗
93. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.16390110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.163901 ↗
94. 10.1038/nphys153410.1038/nphys1534 ↗
95. 10.1126/science.aaf554110.1126/science.aaf5541 ↗
96. 10.1038/s42254-020-0240-210.1038/s42254-020-0240-2 ↗
97. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.07510410.1103/PhysRevB.99.075104 ↗
98. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.01316310.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013163 ↗
99. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.06382510.1103/PhysRevA.82.063825 ↗
100. 10.1038/s41377-020-00367-810.1038/s41377-020-00367-8 ↗