journal article·2022-09Open access

Weak Localization Enhanced Ultrathin Scattering Media

Ruben C. R. Pompe, Dominic T. Meiers, Walter Pfeiffer, Georg von Freymann

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 10· Issue 18

Abstract

Abstract The brilliant white appearance of ultrathin scattering media with low refractive index contrast and the underlying radiative transport phenomena fascinate scientists for more than a decade. Examples of such systems are the scales of beetles of the genus Cyphochilus, photonic network structures or disordered Bragg stacks (DBS). While previous studies relate the highly efficient scattering in the scales to the anisotropy of the intra‐scale network and diffusive light transport, the coherent radiation propagation dynamics remains unaccounted for. Here, the identification of different coherent light transport regimes using time and spatially resolved coherent light scattering spectroscopy is shown. At least 20% of the collected scattered light originates from weakly localized random photonic modes, in contrast to solely diffusive light transport assumed to date. The identification of this significant role of weak localization in ultrathin brilliant scattering media establishes a new design paradigm for efficient scattering optical materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Random lasers and scattering media · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Optical Coherence Tomography Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics Bielefeld University 33615 Bielefeld Germany

Physics Department and Research Center OPTIMAS Technische Universität Kaiserslautern 67663 Kaiserslautern Germany

Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM 67663 Kaiserslautern Germany

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1464-4258/2/6/20110.1088/1464-4258/2/6/201 ↗
2. 10.1039/c3ra41096j10.1039/c3ra41096j ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20170530910.1002/adfm.201705309 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.003 ↗
5. 10.1002/adom.20150042810.1002/adom.201500428 ↗
6. 10.1002/wnan.139610.1002/wnan.1396 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0253810.1021/acsnano.1c02538 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.113466610.1126/science.1134666 ↗
9. 10.1038/srep0607510.1038/srep06075 ↗
10. 10.1002/adom.20150017310.1002/adom.201500173 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20170205710.1002/adma.201702057 ↗
12. 10.1098/rsfs.2018.005010.1098/rsfs.2018.0050 ↗
13. 10.1002/adom.20190098010.1002/adom.201900980 ↗
14. 10.1002/adom.20190004310.1002/adom.201900043 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.514468810.1063/1.5144688 ↗
16. 10.1364/OME.42704710.1364/OME.427047 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.6b1598610.1021/acsami.6b15986 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20170690110.1002/adfm.201706901 ↗
19. 10.1038/s42004-019-0202-810.1038/s42004-019-0202-8 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20180888510.1002/adfm.201808885 ↗
21. 10.1002/adom.20210078710.1002/adom.202100787 ↗
22. 10.1002/lpor.20150028410.1002/lpor.201500284 ↗
23. 10.1142/760910.1142/7609 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.204910.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2049 ↗
25. 10.1038/nphys97110.1038/nphys971 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.10.00110.1016/j.solmat.2014.10.001 ↗
27. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.15910.1038/nphoton.2015.159 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.504819410.1063/1.5048194 ↗
29. 10.1364/JOSAB.12.00246710.1364/JOSAB.12.002467 ↗
30. Mecklenbräuker W. · 1997
31. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.02381210.1103/PhysRevA.78.023812 ↗
32. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.6910.1038/nphoton.2012.69 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.558410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5584 ↗
34. 10.1038/3775710.1038/37757 ↗
35. 10.1088/0022-3727/36/14/31010.1088/0022-3727/36/14/310 ↗
36. 10.1364/BOE.8.00551810.1364/BOE.8.005518 ↗
37. 10.1364/BOE.43205210.1364/BOE.432052 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-020-20613-210.1038/s41467-020-20613-2 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11082-020-02366-w10.1007/s11082-020-02366-w ↗
40. 10.1109/PROC.1978.1083710.1109/PROC.1978.10837 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0030-4018(00)00825-710.1016/S0030-4018(00)00825-7 ↗
42. 10.1364/OE.19.02406110.1364/OE.19.024061 ↗
43. 10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F ↗