journal article·2019-03

Metasurface for Constructing a Stable High‐Q Plano‐Planar Open Cavity

Jichao Fu, Yi Jin, Sailing He

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 7· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Traditional open cavities are constructed by planar or concave mirrors. A Fabry–Pérot (FP) cavity is convenient to integrate and fabricate, but highly sensitive to the parallelism of the end mirrors. In contrast, a concave cavity is more stable and possesses a lower leaky rate, but the curved geometry brings inconvenience. Here, it is suggested that a planar meta‐cavity can simultaneously possess the advantages of both of the above open cavities by using a metasurface to create a planar meta‐mirror that mimics the behavior of a concave mirror. For demonstration, a microwave meta‐cavity is constructed, whose meta‐mirror consists of subwavelength ceramic blocks on a metal substrate. Compared to an FP cavity, the meta‐cavity is more robust against the alignment error of the end mirrors, and 15‐fold enhancement of the quality factor is observed numerically. Experimental results are in good agreement with the simulated results. The suggested method may be extended to work in high frequency ranges. This work would support the planarization and miniaturization of an open cavity and may also increase the functionality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Antenna Design and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Optical and Electromagnetic Research State Key Laboratory for Modern Optical Instrumentation Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310058 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0193910.1038/nature01939 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.121071310.1126/science.1210713 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat383910.1038/nmat3839 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2015.18610.1038/nnano.2015.186 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aaa249410.1126/science.aaa2494 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-017-00166-710.1038/s41467-017-00166-7 ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms380710.1038/ncomms3807 ↗
8. 10.1038/nnano.2015.210.1038/nnano.2015.2 ↗
9. 10.1021/nl404448210.1021/nl4044482 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0021810.1021/acsnano.5b00218 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-018-03330-910.1038/s41467-018-03330-9 ↗
12. 10.1364/OE.24.01167710.1364/OE.24.011677 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep3815610.1038/srep38156 ↗
14. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.3710.1038/nphoton.2016.37 ↗
15. Siegman A. E. · 1986
16. 10.1038/s41566-017-0027-x10.1038/s41566-017-0027-x ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0243310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02433 ↗
18. 10.3390/s1708174810.3390/s17081748 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.00410.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.004 ↗
20. 10.1017/CBO978113964418110.1017/CBO9781139644181 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.aam810010.1126/science.aam8100 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat329210.1038/nmat3292 ↗
23. 10.1126/sciadv.160271410.1126/sciadv.1602714 ↗
24. Shaker J. · 2013
25. 10.1209/0295-5075/117/3700710.1209/0295-5075/117/37007 ↗
26. 10.1038/srep2417810.1038/srep24178 ↗
27. 10.1109/TMTT.1985.113303310.1109/TMTT.1985.1133033 ↗
28. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.6110.1103/RevModPhys.87.61 ↗
29. 10.1002/lpor.20081001810.1002/lpor.200810018 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep4017410.1038/srep40174 ↗
31. 10.1364/OL.38.00341010.1364/OL.38.003410 ↗
32. 10.1126/science.aao539210.1126/science.aao5392 ↗