journal article·2020-12Open access

A Knotted Metamolecule with Axisymmetric Strong Optical Activity

Wending Mai, Lei Kang, Ronald Jenkins, Danny Zhu, Chunxu Mao, Pingjuan L. Werner, Yifan Chen, Douglas H. Werner

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 8· Issue 23

Abstract

Abstract Optical activity is the ability of chiral materials to rotate linearly polarized electromagnetic waves. A knotted chiral metamolecule is introduced here that exhibits strong optical activity corresponding to a 90° polarization rotation of the incident waves. More importantly, the torus knot structure is intrinsically chiral and multifold axisymmetric. Consequently, the observed polarization rotation behavior is found to be independent of how the incident wave is polarized. The metamolecule is fabricated through selective laser melting and experimentally validated in the microwave spectrum. This work represents the first ever metamolecule to be reported that is intrinsically axisymmetric and capable of simultaneously exhibiting strong optical activity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Liquid Crystal Research Advancements · Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrical Engineering Department the Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA

United States Military Academy West Point NY 10996 USA

University of Waikato Hamilton 3240 New Zealand

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology · National Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.12510510.1103/PhysRevB.89.125105 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.368259110.1063/1.3682591 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.482653610.1063/1.4826536 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.342968310.1063/1.3429683 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms1418010.1038/ncomms14180 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0388210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03882 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.12110410.1103/PhysRevB.79.121104 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.02390110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.023901 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.22740110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.227401 ↗
10. 10.1364/OE.16.01873110.1364/OE.16.018731 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.117703110.1126/science.1177031 ↗
12. 10.1109/TAP.2013.225213610.1109/TAP.2013.2252136 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.03100510.1103/PhysRevX.5.031005 ↗
14. Adams C. C. · 2004
15. Kauffman L. H. · 2006
16. 10.1038/nphys256010.1038/nphys2560 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.15040410.1103/PhysRevLett.111.150404 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.aay163810.1126/science.aay1638 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.299004510.1126/science.2990045 ↗
20. 10.1038/nnano.2016.15310.1038/nnano.2016.153 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.257.5073.111010.1126/science.257.5073.1110 ↗
22. 10.1364/OL.20.00011510.1364/OL.20.000115 ↗
23. Jaggard D. L. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 1979 · 18 · 211
24. 10.1109/8.79195510.1109/8.791955 ↗
25. 10.1109/8.93115710.1109/8.931157 ↗
26. Werner D. H. · 2000
27. 10.1109/LAWP.2015.245319810.1109/LAWP.2015.2453198 ↗
28. 10.1109/TAP.2017.275440310.1109/TAP.2017.2754403 ↗
29. 10.1038/304559a010.1038/304559a0 ↗
30. 10.1088/0957-0233/10/5/30610.1088/0957-0233/10/5/306 ↗