journal article·2022-09Open access

Discovery of New Plasmonic Metals via High‐Throughput Machine Learning

Ethan P. Shapera, André Schleife

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 10· Issue 18

Abstract

Abstract The field of plasmonics aims to manipulate and control light through nanoscale structuring and choice of materials. Finding materials with low‐loss response to an applied optical field while exhibiting collective oscillations due to intraband transitions is an outstanding challenge. This is viewed as a materials selection problem that bridges the gap between the large number of candidate materials and the high computational cost to accurately compute their individual optical properties. To address this, online databases that compile computational data for numerous properties of tens to hundreds of thousands of materials are combined with first‐principles simulations and the Drude model. By means of density functional theory (DFT), a training set of geometry‐dependent plasmonic quality factors for ≈1000 materials is computed and subsequently random‐forest regressors are trained on these data. Descriptors are limited to symmetry, quantities obtained using the chemical formula, and the Mendeleev database, which allows to rapidly screen 7445 candidates on Materials Project. Using DFT to compute quality factors for the 233 most promising materials, AlCu3, ZnCu, and ZnGa3 are identified as excellent potential new plasmonic metals. This finding is substantiated by analyzing their electronic structure and interband optical properties in detail.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA

Materials Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA

National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (90)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/14/14421110.1088/0953-8984/21/14/144211 ↗
2. 10.1119/1.169137210.1119/1.1691372 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat85210.1038/nmat852 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.195105710.1063/1.1951057 ↗
5. 10.1021/nl049951r10.1021/nl049951r ↗
6. 10.1063/1.495438210.1063/1.4954382 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.10310.1038/nphoton.2008.103 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.09550410.1103/PhysRevLett.95.095504 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.113326810.1126/science.1133268 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.470738210.1063/1.4707382 ↗
11. 10.1557/mrs.2012.17310.1557/mrs.2012.173 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
13. 10.1364/AO.24.00449310.1364/AO.24.004493 ↗
14. 10.1021/j100287a02810.1021/j100287a028 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja906441510.1021/ja9064415 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.217734810.1063/1.2177348 ↗
17. 10.1364/OPEX.13.00552210.1364/OPEX.13.005522 ↗
18. 10.1038/nphys310310.1038/nphys3103 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.01410.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.014 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.01610.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.016 ↗
24. Bergerhoff G. · 1987 · 77
25. Scheffler M. · 2014
26. 10.1021/co200012w10.1021/co200012w ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20100389010.1002/adma.201003890 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.08514210.1103/PhysRevB.93.085142 ↗
29. 10.1021/cr500207g10.1021/cr500207g ↗
30. 10.1038/nmat175210.1038/nmat1752 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.06870110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.068701 ↗
32. 10.1002/adts.20180007510.1002/adts.201800075 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.10550310.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 ↗
34. 10.1002/lpor.20090005510.1002/lpor.200900055 ↗
35. 10.1021/nn507225410.1021/nn5072254 ↗
36. 10.1088/0305-4608/18/4/01810.1088/0305-4608/18/4/018 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b0040910.1021/acsphotonics.5b00409 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.11514510.1103/PhysRevB.95.115145 ↗
39. 10.1038/ncomms804410.1038/ncomms8044 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.511010.1103/PhysRevB.55.5110 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.23512510.1103/PhysRevB.70.235125 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.32159310.1063/1.321593 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.32447710.1063/1.324477 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.11533410.1103/PhysRevB.86.115334 ↗
45. S.Zhang B.Xu Y.Lin C.Nan W.Liu arXiv:1710.02495 2017.
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.04511210.1103/PhysRevB.73.045112 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.01640210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.016402 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.08510310.1103/PhysRevB.78.085103 ↗
51. 10.1116/1.482656110.1116/1.4826561 ↗
52. 10.1021/nl101475n10.1021/nl101475n ↗
53. 10.1364/OL.43.00092710.1364/OL.43.000927 ↗
54. 10.1364/OE.16.01985010.1364/OE.16.019850 ↗
55. 10.1007/s11468-019-00965-210.1007/s11468-019-00965-2 ↗
56. 10.1021/ph500423710.1021/ph5004237 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
59. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/09500310.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095003 ↗
60. 10.1126/sciadv.170181610.1126/sciadv.1701816 ↗
61. Bonchev D. · 1991
62. L.Mentel mendeleev – A python resource for properties of chemical elements ions and isotopes https://bitbucket.org/lukaszmentel/mendeleev.
63. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn, Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
65. 10.1002/lapl.20061008310.1002/lapl.200610083 ↗
66. 10.1021/jp808300q10.1021/jp808300q ↗
67. 10.3390/s811711310.3390/s8117113 ↗
68. 10.1364/OE.16.00021910.1364/OE.16.000219 ↗
69. 10.1002/adom.20150050810.1002/adom.201500508 ↗
70. 10.1039/C4NR03055A10.1039/C4NR03055A ↗
71. 10.1007/s11837-016-2001-310.1007/s11837-016-2001-3 ↗
72. B.Blaiszik L.Ward M.Schwarting J.Gaff R.Chard D.Pike K.Chard I.Foster arXiv:1904.10423 2019.
73. E.Shapera A.Schleife Dataset for the paper “discovery of new plasmonic metals via high throughput machine learning” 2021 https://petreldata.net/mdf/detail/shapera_paper_discovery_learning_v1.1.10.1002/adom.202200158 ↗
74. Dodge Y. · 2008
75. 10.1007/978-981-10-7617-6_110.1007/978-981-10-7617-6_1 ↗
76. 10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y ↗
77. G.Landrum RDKit Documentation Release 1 2013 pp.1–79.
78. 10.1038/s41586-018-0337-210.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
79. 10.1038/nphys403510.1038/nphys4035 ↗
80. 10.1038/nature2597810.1038/nature25978 ↗
81. 10.1038/nmat471710.1038/nmat4717 ↗
82. Hepner G. · Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. · 1990 · 56 · 469
83. 10.1080/0143116950895450710.1080/01431169508954507 ↗
84. 10.1088/2040-8986/aac1d810.1088/2040-8986/aac1d8 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.01510.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.015 ↗
86. A.Togo I.Tanaka arXiv:1808.01590 2018.
87. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1653310.1103/PhysRevB.54.16533 ↗
88. 10.1088/0953-8984/9/4/00210.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002 ↗
89. 10.1063/1.156406010.1063/1.1564060 ↗
90. 10.1063/1.220459710.1063/1.2204597 ↗