VITRO‐P: Revolutionizing Optical Tissue Phantoms with Tailored Vascular Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Advancements in optical sensors and spectroscopy have transformed biomedical research, but the lack of standardized benchmarks for evaluating these tools hampers progress. Existing tissue‐mimicking phantoms, essential for testing optical technologies, often lack embedded vasculature, limiting their ability to mimic human tissues. While techniques like bioprinting and millifluidics have made strides in replicating vascular structures, they lack flexibility to control vascular architecture or capture human variability. Using animal or human vasculature scans to fabricate vasculature in optical tissue phantoms often requires extensive effort to clean geometries or modify networks for specific research needs. Here, a novel approach using generative computational design and 3D‐printed sacrificial molds is presented to create customizable, intricate vascular networks inside optical tissue phantoms made of various base materials. This generative design method allows tailoring vascular structures to mimic human tissue variability and complexity, providing a more accurate platform for non‐invasive optical measurements. The Vascular Integrated Tissue Replica Optical – Phantom (VITRO‐P) supports continuous dynamic fluid flow at physiologically relevant rates for over three weeks. Precise flow velocity measurements and beats‐per‐minute (bpm) detection under pulsatile flow are demonstrated, showcasing the platform's versatility. This work sets a new standard for customizable, biomimetic phantoms in biomedical research and clinical testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Ocular and Laser Science Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD 21218 USA
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science The Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21205 USA
Department of Oncology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD 21287 USA
Funding
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2967/jnumed.107.04579910.2967/jnumed.107.045799 ↗
2. 10.1088/2516-1091/abaaa310.1088/2516-1091/abaaa3 ↗
3. 10.1002/adpr.20220019410.1002/adpr.202200194 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41551-022-00890-610.1038/s41551-022-00890-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.13524010.1016/j.snb.2023.135240 ↗
6. Mustari A. · J. Vis. Exp. (JoVE) · 2018 · 123
7. “Optically Dilute Absorbing Turbid Phantoms for Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Homogeneous Inhomogeneous Samples” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1366/0003702934066244?src=getftr(accessed: October 2024).
8. 10.1002/lsm.104410.1002/lsm.1044 ↗
9. “Review of tissue simulating phantoms for optical spectroscopy imaging dosimetry” https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/journal‐of‐biomedical‐optics/volume‐11/issue‐04/041102/Review‐of‐tissue‐simulating‐phantoms‐for‐optical‐spectroscopy‐imaging‐and/10.1117/1.2335429.full#_=_ (accessed: October 2024).10.1117/1.2335429 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20191081110.1002/adfm.201910811 ↗
11. T.Yamamoto B.Vagvolgyi K.Balaji L. L.Whitcomb A. M.Okamura in2009 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics Automation IEEE Kobe Japan2009 pp.4239–4245.
12. R.Öpik A.Hunt A.Ristolainen P. M.Aubin M.Kruusmaa presented at2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics Biomechatronics (BioRob) Rome Italy June2012.
13. A.Murali S.Sen B.Kehoe A.Garg S.McFarland S.Patil WD.Boyd S.Lim P.Abbeel K.Goldberg presented at2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics Automation (ICRA) Seattle WA USA May2015.
14. 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.02210.1016/j.juro.2008.10.022 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.7b1661110.1021/acsami.7b16611 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10439-013-0752-310.1007/s10439-013-0752-3 ↗
17. 10.3390/photonics908053810.3390/photonics9080538 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11548-020-02201-310.1007/s11548-020-02201-3 ↗
19. 10.1118/1.59867210.1118/1.598672 ↗
20. 10.1118/1.59799110.1118/1.597991 ↗
21. 10.1080/17452759.2023.224810110.1080/17452759.2023.2248101 ↗
22. 10.1093/ejcts/ezu14810.1093/ejcts/ezu148 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-022-14279-710.1038/s41598-022-14279-7 ↗
24. 10.1088/0960-1317/14/3/R0110.1088/0960-1317/14/3/R01 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.03510.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035 ↗
26. 10.3389/fsurg.2020.62621210.3389/fsurg.2020.626212 ↗
27. S.Ikeda F.Arai T.Fukuda E. H.Kim M.Negoro K.Irie I.Takahashi in2005 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots Systems IEEE Edmonton AB Canada2005 pp.1558–1563.10.1109/IROS.2005.1545554 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0042310.1021/acs.biomac.2c00423 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.05.00810.1016/j.jcot.2018.05.008 ↗
30. 10.3390/bioengineering810013010.3390/bioengineering8100130 ↗
31. 10.1364/AO.57.00393810.1364/AO.57.003938 ↗
32. 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.288343710.1109/TRPMS.2018.2883437 ↗
33. 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/10593202010.30534/ijatcse/2020/105932020 ↗
34. 10.1007/s44150-022-00077-210.1007/s44150-022-00077-2 ↗
35. Gavrilova M. L. · 2009
36. 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.042604.13393310.1146/annurev.fluid.37.042604.133933 ↗
37. 10.1161/01.RES.0000255691.76142.4a10.1161/01.RES.0000255691.76142.4a ↗
38. 10.1017/CBO978113901340610.1017/CBO9781139013406 ↗
39. 10.1177/117959722094810010.1177/1179597220948100 ↗
40. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1999)24:2<133::AID-LSM9>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1999)24:2<133::AID-LSM9>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
41. 10.1007/s13239-017-0317-y10.1007/s13239-017-0317-y ↗
42. 10.1111/micc.1285410.1111/micc.12854 ↗
43. 10.1088/1758-5090/acb73c10.1088/1758-5090/acb73c ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cad.2010.09.00910.1016/j.cad.2010.09.009 ↗
45. 10.1002/mrm.109610.1002/mrm.1096 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.hcl.2019.08.00110.1016/j.hcl.2019.08.001 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80060-610.1016/S0363-5023(87)80060-6 ↗