High Reverse Intersystem Crossing Rate Diminishes the Impact of Conformational Disorder Phenomenon in Solid‐State TADF
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Embedding donor–acceptor type thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) molecules in a rigid surrounding lead to structural inhomogeneity, and deteriorating emission decay rates. Designing TADF structures with hampered rotational flexibility between donor and acceptor structural units is shown to lower the conformational disorder. However, in this work, it is shown that it is not always enough. In fact, the negative impact of conformational inhomogeneity may be reduced by lowering the singlet‐triplet energy gap (ΔEST) and boosting the reverse intersystem crossing (rISC) rate while preserving the same donor‐acceptor orientation. In such cases the lower ΔEST enables the early triplet upconversion even from the conformers with unfavorably low D‐A twist angles, which is not observed in compounds with larger ΔEST. In this way, the temporal shifts of prompt and delayed fluorescence are evidently reduced. When the reverse intersystem crossing is inactive at low temperatures, nearly the same fluorescence peak shifts are observed, as expected for compounds with similar molecular geometry. In this way, low ΔEST and rapid rISC are shown to be of fundamental importance not only for TADF efficiency but also for the temporal dynamics in the solid‐state.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Photonics and Nanotechnology Vilnius University Sauletekio 3 Vilnius LT‐10257 Lithuania
Institute of Chemistry Vilnius University Naugarduko 24 Vilnius LT‐03225 Lithuania
Funding
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jsid.105810.1002/jsid.1058 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mser.2009.09.00110.1016/j.mser.2009.09.001 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.9879910.1063/1.98799 ↗
4. 10.1038/2595410.1038/25954 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.355890610.1063/1.3558906 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20150549110.1002/adma.201505491 ↗
7. 10.1088/2050-6120/aa537e10.1088/2050-6120/aa537e ↗
8. 10.1038/nature1168710.1038/nature11687 ↗
9. 10.1002/cphc.20160066210.1002/cphc.201600662 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms1368010.1038/ncomms13680 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7CP00719A10.1039/C7CP00719A ↗
12. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.3110.1038/nphoton.2012.31 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0026810.1021/acsenergylett.7b00268 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0168910.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01689 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0051410.1021/acsaelm.0c00514 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7TC04099G10.1039/C7TC04099G ↗
17. 10.1039/D0TC02627A10.1039/D0TC02627A ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0101110.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01011 ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.2c0553710.1021/jacs.2c05537 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.02710.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.027 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-023-38197-y10.1038/s41467-023-38197-y ↗
22. 10.1039/D3TC02347H10.1039/D3TC02347H ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0186410.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01864 ↗
24. 10.1039/C9CP05907E10.1039/C9CP05907E ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0826910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08269 ↗
26. 10.1039/D4SC00033A10.1039/D4SC00033A ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.11.04210.1016/j.cplett.2015.11.042 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.05408210.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.054082 ↗
29. 10.1002/adom.20210024910.1002/adom.202100249 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41566-024-01395-110.1038/s41566-024-01395-1 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0381010.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03810 ↗
32. 10.1002/adom.20240002410.1002/adom.202400024 ↗
33. 10.1039/C5CC09645F10.1039/C5CC09645F ↗
34. 10.1039/D0TC05503D10.1039/D0TC05503D ↗
35. 10.1039/D1TC04484B10.1039/D1TC04484B ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20180255810.1002/adfm.201802558 ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20160945910.1002/anie.201609459 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-020-15558-510.1038/s41467-020-15558-5 ↗
39. 10.1039/D0SC04715E10.1039/D0SC04715E ↗
40. 10.1039/C9TC02408E10.1039/C9TC02408E ↗
41. 10.1039/D1CP04905D10.1039/D1CP04905D ↗