journal article·2025-02Open access

The Art of Finding the Optimal Scattering Center(s)

Alexander V. Kildishev, Karim Achouri, Daria Smirnova

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract The truncated spatial multipolar spectra enable efficient approximate solutions to acoustic, quantum‐mechanical, and electromagnetic problems. In photonics, the efficient multipole description of a general emitter or scatterer with controlled accuracy is complicated by the ambiguity in choosing the multipole expansion center—the multipole terms depend on the position of the expansion center and therefore are not unique. This study solves this fundamental problem by finding the optimal scattering centers for which the spatial multipole spectrum becomes unique. These optimal positions are derived separately for the electric and magnetic multipoles by minimizing the norms of the poloidal quadrupoles, employing the long‐wave approximation (LWA) ansatz. The ultimate positions are verified with idealized discrete emitters and realistic scatterers. The optimal multipoles, including the toroidal terms, are calculated for several distinct scatterers; their utility for fast, low‐cost numerical schemes is discussed. The number of optimal magnetic scattering centers, defined by the multiplicity of the problem, can serve as a new topological metric of a given emitter or scatterer. This finding hints at potential relations between nanoscale optomechanics and topological photonics. Expansion of the work beyond the LWA is possible, with the promise of more general foundational concepts for electrodynamics, acoustics, and quantum mechanics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Birck Nanotechnology Center Purdue University 1205 W State St West Lafayette IN 47907 USA

Nanophotonics and Metrology Laboratory, Institute of Electrical and Microengineering École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Route Cantonale 1015 Lausanne Switzerland

ARC Centre of Excellence for Transformative Meta‐Optical Systems (TMOS), Research School of Physics Australian National University Canberra ACT 2601 Australia

Funding

Office of Naval Research · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Australian Research Council

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Brink D. M. · 1968
2. 10.1080/0026897720010128110.1080/00268977200101281 ↗
3. C. F.Bohren D. R.Huffman Absorption and scattering of light by small particles John Wiley & Sons Inc. 1st edition 1983.
4. 10.1002/978352761842210.1002/9783527618422 ↗
5. Raab R. E. · 2005
6. 10.1007/978-3-642-90850-710.1007/978-3-642-90850-7 ↗
7. 10.3133/pp111810.3133/pp1118 ↗
8. 10.1201/978042906386210.1201/9780429063862 ↗
9. 10.1364/OPTICA.3.00124110.1364/OPTICA.3.001241 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.20511210.1103/PhysRevB.89.205112 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.04542410.1103/PhysRevB.99.045424 ↗
12. K.Achouri C.Caloz Electromagnetic Metasurfaces John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2021.10.1002/9781119525219 ↗
13. 10.1109/TAP.2022.321390710.1109/TAP.2022.3213907 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L04130410.1103/PhysRevB.107.L041304 ↗
15. 10.1006/gmip.1995.103410.1006/gmip.1995.1034 ↗
16. Choi D. · Zeitschr. Angew. Mathemat. Phys. · 2023 · 74 · 1
17. G.Gerig M.Styner D.Jones D.Weinberger J.Lieberman inProceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001) 2001 pp.171–178.
18. 10.1109/TBME.1965.450237310.1109/TBME.1965.4502373 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.06.00910.1016/j.patrec.2010.06.009 ↗
20. Gumerov N. A. · 2004
21. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-015610.1515/nanoph-2020-0156 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20200380410.1002/adma.202003804 ↗
23. 10.1002/adom.20200146910.1002/adom.202001469 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.11530310.1103/PhysRevB.100.115303 ↗
25. 10.1002/apxr.20220005210.1002/apxr.202200052 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.15390710.1103/PhysRevLett.122.153907 ↗
27. 10.1002/lpor.20200004910.1002/lpor.202000049 ↗
28. 10.1364/PRJ.48562510.1364/PRJ.485625 ↗
29. Wu T. · Physical review. A · 2020 · 101 · 1
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0001410.1021/acsphotonics.0c00014 ↗
31. 10.1007/978-3-319-74890-010.1007/978-3-319-74890-0 ↗
32. 10.1016/B978-044450282-7/50014-210.1016/B978-044450282-7/50014-2 ↗
33. 10.1098/rstl.1851.001210.1098/rstl.1851.0012 ↗
34. Schmidt A. · Gerland's Beiträge zur Geophysik · 1934 · 48 · 356
35. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb03992.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb03992.x ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.220074911910.1073/pnas.2200749119 ↗
37. A.Kildishev S.Volokhov J.Saltykov in1997 IEEE Autotestcon Proceedings AUTOTESTCON '97. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Systems Readiness Supporting Global Needs and Awareness in the 21st Century.1997 pp.669–675.
38. 10.1007/s11214-008-9423-310.1007/s11214-008-9423-3 ↗
39. 10.1007/978-1-4757-9634-6_510.1007/978-1-4757-9634-6_5 ↗
40. 10.1016/0009-2614(81)85452-810.1016/0009-2614(81)85452-8 ↗
41. 10.1021/ct05019010.1021/ct050190 ↗
42. P.Politzer J. S.Murray Molecular Electrostatic Potentials: Significance and Applications chapter 7 113–134 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2021.10.1002/9781119683353.ch7 ↗
43. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199602)17:3<358::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199602)17:3<358::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
44. 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.08.06410.1016/j.optcom.2017.08.064 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.11542810.1103/PhysRevB.106.115428 ↗
46. Riccardi M. · 2022 · PC1219703
47. 10.1002/lpor.20180026610.1002/lpor.201800266 ↗
48. 10.1002/lpor.20210011410.1002/lpor.202100114 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.03515610.1103/PhysRevB.107.035156 ↗
50. 10.1364/JOSAA.26.00073210.1364/JOSAA.26.000732 ↗
51. 10.1126/science.121071310.1126/science.1210713 ↗
52. 10.1002/adom.20220156410.1002/adom.202201564 ↗
53. 10.1002/adom.20210205910.1002/adom.202102059 ↗