journal article·2024-11Open access

Directionally Asymmetric in Orbital Angular Momentum Generation Using Single‐Layer Dielectric Janus Metasurfaces

Chang‐Yi Lin, Jhih‐Hao Huang, Huan‐Teng Su, Shu‐Ming Chang, Yun‐Chien Wu, Yao‐Wei Huang

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 12· Issue 31

Abstract

Abstract Janus metasurfaces, offering versatile light manipulation contingent on incident direction, are explored across microwave to mid‐infrared spectra. Nonetheless, prior designs often resort to spatial multiplexing or vertical stacking, entailing complex fabrication. Metallic Janus metasurfaces, owing to material properties, suffer notable Ohmic losses in the visible spectrum. In this study, Single‐layer TiO2‐based Janus metasurfaces with arbitrary polarization control is experimentally demonstrated, exhibiting directionally asymmetric functionalities in spin and orbital angular momentum (OAM). A novel Jones matrix formulation tailored for Janus metasurfaces is presented, enabling efficient generation of two asymmetric, high‐purity OAM states of vortex beams at wavelength of 532 nm, contingent on incidence direction. This innovation facilitates compact and versatile phase manipulation, encompassing applications such as lasers and optical combiners, thereby expanding its utility across diverse domains.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Photonics College of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu 300093 Taiwan

Funding

National Science and Technology Council · Ministry of Education

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.818510.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 ↗
2. 10.1364/OE.25.01126510.1364/OE.25.011265 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41377-019-0194-210.1038/s41377-019-0194-2 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0055410.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00554 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aat904210.1126/science.aat9042 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms587610.1038/ncomms5876 ↗
7. 10.1109/JLT.2021.309717610.1109/JLT.2021.3097176 ↗
8. 10.1364/OL.24.00095410.1364/OL.24.000954 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41566-020-0623-z10.1038/s41566-020-0623-z ↗
10. 10.1364/OPTICA.48658210.1364/OPTICA.486582 ↗
11. 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-610.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-6 ↗
12. 10.1364/OL.27.00187510.1364/OL.27.001875 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.16390510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 ↗
14. 10.1364/OE.25.00037710.1364/OE.25.000377 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aao539210.1126/science.aao5392 ↗
16. 10.1364/OE.27.00746910.1364/OE.27.007469 ↗
17. 10.1117/1.JNP.14.01600510.1117/1.JNP.14.016005 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20190635210.1002/adma.201906352 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11126410.1016/j.matdes.2022.111264 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.3c0438210.1021/acsami.3c04382 ↗
21. 10.29026/oea.2023.22007310.29026/oea.2023.220073 ↗
22. 10.1038/nnano.2015.18610.1038/nnano.2015.186 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.11390110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.113901 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.05381110.1103/PhysRevA.82.053811 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41565-024-01636-y10.1038/s41565-024-01636-y ↗
26. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0169710.1021/acsphotonics.2c01697 ↗
27. Brongersma M. L. · SPIE · 2019 · 11080
28. 10.1038/s41377-022-00817-510.1038/s41377-022-00817-5 ↗
29. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-020210.1515/nanoph-2020-0202 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41566-023-01223-y10.1038/s41566-023-01223-y ↗
31. 10.1038/s41566-024-01415-010.1038/s41566-024-01415-0 ↗