journal article·2023-02Open access

How Thin and Efficient Can a Metasurface Reflector Be? Universal Bounds on Reflection for Any Direction and Polarization

Mohamed Ismail Abdelrahman, Francesco Monticone

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 11· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract Light reflection plays a crucial role in a number of modern technologies. In this paper, analytical expressions for maximal reflected power in any direction and for any polarization are given for generic planar structures made of a single material represented by a complex scalar susceptibility. The problem of optimal light‐matter interactions to maximize reflection is formulated as the solution of an optimization problem in terms of the induced currents, subject to energy conservation and passivity, which admits a global upper bound by using Lagrangian duality. The derived upper bounds apply to a broad range of planar structures, including metasurfaces, gratings, homogenized films, photonic crystal slabs, and more generally, any inhomogeneous planar structure irrespective of its geometrical details. These bounds also set the limit on the minimum possible thickness, for a given lossy material, to achieve a desired reflectance. Moreover, the results allow the discovery of parameter regions where large improvements in the efficiency of a reflective structure are possible compared to existing designs. Examples are given of the implications of these findings for the design of superior and compact reflective components made of real, imperfect (i.e., lossy) materials, such as ultra‐thin and efficient gratings, polarization converters, and light‐weight mirrors for solar/laser sails.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · U.S. Air Force

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.100829610710.1073/pnas.1008296107 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.396610.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.105884710.1126/science.1058847 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.109679610.1126/science.1096796 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.112590710.1126/science.1125907 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.09740210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.097402 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat383910.1038/nmat3839 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aat310010.1126/science.aat3100 ↗
9. Rahmat‐Samii Y. · Microwave Journal · 1999 · 42 · 232
10. 10.1364/OE.21.01335110.1364/OE.21.013351 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41598-017-01939-210.1038/s41598-017-01939-2 ↗
12. 10.1515/nanoph-2018-018310.1515/nanoph-2018-0183 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0032710.1021/acsphotonics.0c00327 ↗
14. 10.1109/TAP.2012.222765610.1109/TAP.2012.2227656 ↗
15. 10.1088/1367-2630/ab83d310.1088/1367-2630/ab83d3 ↗
16. Shim H. · Phys. Rev. X · 2019 · 9
17. 10.1364/OPTICA.39871510.1364/OPTICA.398715 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20210394610.1002/adma.202103946 ↗
19. Chao P. · Nat. Rev. Phys. · 2022 · 1
20. 10.1364/OE.46292610.1364/OE.462926 ↗
21. Vulpetti G. · 2014
22. 10.1364/OPTICA.41700710.1364/OPTICA.417007 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0388210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03882 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.03320110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.033201 ↗
25. 10.1364/OME.4.00171710.1364/OME.4.001717 ↗
26. 10.1038/nnano.2015.210.1038/nnano.2015.2 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.aaw674710.1126/science.aaw6747 ↗
28. 10.3390/photonics803006510.3390/photonics8030065 ↗
29. Lesina A. C. · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2020 · 27
30. Budhu J. · 2021
31. 10.1063/10.001011910.1063/10.0010119 ↗
32. 10.1017/CBO978051180444110.1017/CBO9780511804441 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.26360710.1103/PhysRevLett.125.263607 ↗
34. Orfanidis S. J. · 2002
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.11542310.1103/PhysRevB.86.115423 ↗
36. 10.1017/CBO978113964418110.1017/CBO9781139644181 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.07514210.1103/PhysRevB.94.075142 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.06740410.1103/PhysRevLett.119.067404 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.05407710.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.054077 ↗
40. J.Álvarez‐Sanchis B.Vidal S.Tretyakov A.Díaz‐Rubio arXiv:2206.09761 2022.
41. K.Shastri F.Monticone arXiv:2209.02120 2022.
42. M. N.Polyanskiy Refractive index database https://refractiveindex.info(accessed: November 2021).
43. 10.1098/rsta.1904.002410.1098/rsta.1904.0024 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.15511810.1103/PhysRevB.89.155118 ↗
45. M.Scheller C.Jansen M.Koch Applications of effective medium theories in the terahertz regime in recent optical and photonics technologies2010.10.5772/6915 ↗
46. 10.1134/S106377611810011410.1134/S1063776118100114 ↗
47. P. G.Laboratory Hybrid metal‐dielectric diffraction gratings https://www.plymouthgrating.com/product/hybrid-metal-dielectric-diffraction-gratings(accessed: November 2021).
48. Thorlabs Diffraction gratings tutorial https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=9026(accessed: November 2021).
49. Private communication with the manufacturer.
50. 10.1109/TAP.2018.281678410.1109/TAP.2018.2816784 ↗
51. 10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/07640110.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.490127210.1063/1.4901272 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.20390310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.203903 ↗
54. 10.1038/srep4372210.1038/srep43722 ↗