Topological Line Defect Waveguide
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Photonic crystal line‐defect waveguides featuring bandgap confined low loss waveguiding are hindered by high bending losses. Although vortex‐mediated topological modes can facilitate seamless propagation through sharp bends, studies of topological transport have primarily focused on interfacial waveguides. In this work, we unveil the prevalence of topological modes across diverse photonic crystal platforms by experimentally demonstrating topological transport in line‐defect waveguides. Furthermore, this is achieved by employing interfacial waveguides as mode convertors to selectively excite latent topological states. Topological mode signatures, such as counterpropagating waves, are utilized to establish the existence of topological transport in line‐defect waveguides designed using translational unit cells whose electromagnetic eigenstates exhibit phase vortices and non‐zero Berry curvatures. It is envisioned that extending topological photonics beyond interfacial systems unlocks new avenues in applications ranging from non‐Hermitian topological photonics to topological light‐matter interactions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Physics and Applied Physics School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Nanyang Technological University Singapore 637371 Singapore
Centre for Disruptive Photonic Technologies The Photonics Institute Nanyang Technological University Singapore 639798 Singapore
Department of Electrical Engineering University of Notre Dame Notre Dame IN USA
Funding
National Research Foundation Singapore
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1515/978140082824110.1515/9781400828241 ↗
2. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-067310.1515/nanoph-2021-0673 ↗
3. 10.1364/OE.23.03197710.1364/OE.23.031977 ↗
4. 10.1063/5.016801610.1063/5.0168016 ↗
5. 10.1364/OPEX.13.00493910.1364/OPEX.13.004939 ↗
6. 10.1109/JLT.2005.85314110.1109/JLT.2005.853141 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.181506610.1063/1.1815066 ↗
8. 10.7567/1882-0786/aaf4b310.7567/1882-0786/aaf4b3 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-022-32909-610.1038/s41467-022-32909-6 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41565-018-0297-610.1038/s41565-018-0297-6 ↗
11. 10.1002/adpr.20210001310.1002/adpr.202100013 ↗
12. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/02501210.1088/1367-2630/18/2/025012 ↗
13. 10.1364/OE.46801010.1364/OE.468010 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-019-08881-z10.1038/s41467-019-08881-z ↗
15. 10.1109/JLT.2024.342365910.1109/JLT.2024.3423659 ↗
16. 10.1364/OE.42296210.1364/OE.422962 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-024-45175-510.1038/s41467-024-45175-5 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41566-023-01189-x10.1038/s41566-023-01189-x ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-025-56020-810.1038/s41467-025-56020-8 ↗
20. 10.1364/OE.51368510.1364/OE.513685 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.04352110.1103/PhysRevA.110.043521 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.16540310.1103/PhysRevB.106.165403 ↗
23. 10.1002/lpor.20220036210.1002/lpor.202200362 ↗
24. Yang J.‐K. · Phys. Rev. Res. · 2021 · 310.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022025 ↗
25. 10.1364/OL.39905310.1364/OL.399053 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41586-024-07759-510.1038/s41586-024-07759-5 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20230949710.1002/adma.202309497 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20220237010.1002/adma.202202370 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.015735710.1063/5.0157357 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.009712910.1063/5.0097129 ↗
31. 10.1126/sciadv.adi850010.1126/sciadv.adi8500 ↗
32. 10.1063/5.009942310.1063/5.0099423 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20241851010.1002/adma.202418510 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20241508310.1002/adma.202415083 ↗
35. 10.1063/5.021364110.1063/5.0213641 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41566-020-0618-910.1038/s41566-020-0618-9 ↗
37. Lin X. · arXiv · 2024
38. 10.1364/OE.44585110.1364/OE.445851 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41377-020-00458-610.1038/s41377-020-00458-6 ↗