Computational Characterization of Quantum‐Dot Light‐Emitting Diodes by Combinatorial Exciton Recombination Parameters and Photon Extraction Efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Quantum‐dot light‐emitting diodes (QD‐LEDs) have gained significant attention for next‐generation display and lighting systems owing to their superior color selectivity and color purity. To maximize the efficiency of QD‐LED devices, it is of great importance to identify the key factors that govern their electro–optical properties. The efficiency of QD‐LED devices is strongly influenced by combinatorial processes, represented by the Shockley‐Read‐Hall rate A, Langevin strength B, and Auger probability C (ABC parameters) of quantum‐dots (QDs), along with photon extraction efficiency of QD‐LED devices. In this study, an integrated computational framework is proposed to accurately analyze the electro–optical properties of QD‐LED devices. The experimental device properties are characterized by ABC and photon extraction efficiency parameters through an innovative numerical data‐fitting procedure. Utilizing these parameters, a parametric analysis is performed based on a complete computational charge transport simulation model to explore the influence of the combinatorial exciton recombination processes. This computational framework aligns excellently with experimental results, showcasing its remarkable reliability and effectiveness in both quantitatively characterizing QD nanoparticles and in the detailed analysis of the electro–optical properties of QD‐LED devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrical Engineering Division Department of Engineering University of Cambridge 9 JJ Thomson Ave Cambridge CB3 0FA UK
School of Materials and Engineering Kumoh National Institute of Technology (KIT) 61 Daehak‐ro Gumi 39177 South Korea
Funding
H2020 European Research Council · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.110871210.1126/science.1108712 ↗
2. 10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600399CM10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600399CM ↗
3. Brown L. R. · 2009
4. Zissis G. · 2016
5. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.11004310.1016/j.rser.2020.110043 ↗
6. 10.1039/D2TC01060G10.1039/D2TC01060G ↗
7. 10.1038/370354a010.1038/370354a0 ↗
8. 10.1557/mrs.2013.20410.1557/mrs.2013.204 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.32810.1038/nphoton.2012.328 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20140013910.1002/adma.201400139 ↗
11. 10.1109/JDT.2015.241827910.1109/JDT.2015.2418279 ↗
12. Ekimov A. I. · JETP Lett. · 1981 · 34 · 345
13. 10.1039/D0NH00556H10.1039/D0NH00556H ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-022-31853-910.1038/s41467-022-31853-9 ↗
15. 10.1002/pssa.20102614910.1002/pssa.201026149 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.491483310.1063/1.4914833 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11082-014-0042-910.1007/s11082-014-0042-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101942-9.00009-510.1016/B978-0-08-101942-9.00009-5 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.12547310.1063/1.125473 ↗
20. 10.1143/JJAP.41.L114610.1143/JJAP.41.L1146 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.278513510.1063/1.2785135 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.280727210.1063/1.2807272 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.280029010.1063/1.2800290 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.333087010.1063/1.3330870 ↗
25. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.1210.1038/nphoton.2011.12 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.481668010.1063/1.4816680 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.04.00910.1016/j.solmat.2014.04.009 ↗
28. 10.1088/0268-1242/30/6/06500510.1088/0268-1242/30/6/065005 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.499684510.1063/1.4996845 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.physb.2019.41166710.1016/j.physb.2019.411667 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41524-021-00591-910.1038/s41524-021-00591-9 ↗
32. 10.1090/qam/1066710.1090/qam/10667 ↗
33. M.Abadi P.Barham J.Chen Z.Chen A.Davis J.Dean M.Devin S.Ghemawat G.Irving M.Isard M.Kudlur J.Levenberg R.Monga S.Moore D. G.Murray B.Steiner P.Tucker V.Vasudevan P.Warden M.Wicke Y.Yu X.Zheng in12th USENIX Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation USENIX Savannah 2016pp.265–283.
34. E. M.Dogo O. J.Afolabi N. I.Nwulu B.Twala C. O.Aigbavboa in2018 Int. Conf. on Computational Techniques Electronics and Mechanical Systems (CTEMS) IEEE Belgaum India 2018pp.92–99.10.1109/CTEMS.2018.8769211 ↗
35. 10.1155/2021/995677310.1155/2021/9956773 ↗
36. 10.1016/0038-1101(95)00128-X10.1016/0038-1101(95)00128-X ↗
37. Nowozin T. · 2013
38. 10.1137/06065075110.1137/060650751 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.16520410.1103/PhysRevB.83.165204 ↗
40. Van Rossum G. · 1995
41. 10.1063/1.494577210.1063/1.4945772 ↗
42. 10.1016/0038-1101(82)90203-910.1016/0038-1101(82)90203-9 ↗
43. 10.1016/0038-1101(83)90173-910.1016/0038-1101(83)90173-9 ↗
44. 10.1109/TED.2011.217099210.1109/TED.2011.2170992 ↗
45. 10.1002/adom.20180035410.1002/adom.201800354 ↗
46. Goetzberger A. · 1998
47. Green M. A. · 1982
48. 10.1063/1.37387810.1063/1.373878 ↗
49. 10.1126/science.287.5455.101110.1126/science.287.5455.1011 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.03520710.1103/PhysRevB.92.035207 ↗
51. 10.1134/S106377610706013110.1134/S1063776107060131 ↗
52. 10.1021/jp908248610.1021/jp9082486 ↗
53. 10.3390/nano1006103210.3390/nano10061032 ↗
54. Ansgar L. · Phys. Status Solidi C · 2009 · 6 · S913
55. 10.3390/ma304226010.3390/ma3042260 ↗
56. 10.1002/wnan.7810.1002/wnan.78 ↗
57. 10.3390/s15061328810.3390/s150613288 ↗
58. 10.1002/pssa.20040690510.1002/pssa.200406905 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.447210.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4472 ↗
60. 10.1051/rphysap:019890024012010850010.1051/rphysap:0198900240120108500 ↗
61. 10.1016/0038-1098(72)91140-410.1016/0038-1098(72)91140-4 ↗