Concentration‐ and Solvent‐Dependent Photochemical Instability of 6,13‐Bis(triisopropysilylethynyl)pentacene
Source abstract
Abstract
The solvent- and concentration-dependent photostability of TIPS-pentacene in solution is directly related to the efficiency of singlet-state deactivation by a combination of pairwise interactions and quenching at low concentration. At higher concentrations, further increases in stability suggest the onset of aggregation. Solution processing of organic electronic materials is becoming commonplace for device fabrication since it provides a facile route to controlled, patterned thin films. Many of the candidate species however contain intense chromophores and a quality-limiting factor in device fabrication is photochemical degradation in the solution phase. Pentacene for example has a very short half-life in solution under the influence of light; this behaviour can be attenuated markedly by derivatisation at the 6- and 13- positions.1-3 As a consequence, materials such as 6,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)pentacene (TIPS-pentacene) are becoming popular replacements for pentacene in electronic devices.4, 5 However, these derivatives are themselves still prone to photochemical degradation during processing, which potentially perturbs both the optical absorption and electronic properties of films cast from solution. Upon UV irradiation (∼300 nm), TIPS-pentacene forms dimers by cycloaddition6 and at visible wavelengths is known to photodegrade in solution via a process involving dissolved oxygen.7 The predominant mechanism for this molecule involves activation of O2 molecules by the initially-formed excited state; this either generates singlet O2 species or a superoxide O2− which then adds back across appropriate carbon centres in TIPS-pentacene to produce an endoperoxide (EPO), which is seen as the main product by NMR.7 Recent studies using chemically generated8, 9 singlet O2 have further demonstrated that the superoxide route is the most favoured of the two for TIPS-pentacene, contributing around 90% to the overall rate of EPO formation. Electron transfer rates from excited-state pentacenes are also observed to be fast and solvent-dependent.3 Deactivation of the initial singlet state by mechanisms which can compete with O2 activation therefore serves to increase photostability. The main non-radiative mechanism for this is singlet fission10, 11 via interaction with a second TIPS-pentacene molecule to produce a pair of triplets. This has been studied extensively in thin films of pentacene and its derivatives.12-15 Studies of the photochemistry of pentacene monomers and dimers in host crystals indicate that the singlet lifetime is much shorter in dimers than monomers, confirming the importance of pair-wise interactions.16 Luminescence lifetimes are also strongly environment-dependent, ranging from around 7 ns in dilute solution17 to sub-ps in thin films.15 Direct observation of the kinetics of singlet fission of TIPS-pentacene in anhydrous, O2-free CHCl3 solution over a range of concentrations reveals a singlet lifetime of ∼13 ns,18 whilst a high-concentration triplet yield of 200% and triplet formation at a rate approaching the diffusion limit indicates the efficiency of the process. Physical quenching must also be considered as a deactivation route in any condensed medium. Stability in solution is therefore controlled by the rates and quantum yields of these processes, many of which are not known. Recent reports of half-life increase by the attachment of stable radical species to pentacenes is further evidence of the importance of the initial singlet state lifetime.19 In this communication, a systematic study of the half-life of TIPS-pentacene in a variety of air-equilibrated common solvents (including toluene, tetrahydrofuran (THF), dichloromethane, chloroform, isopropanol (IPA), decane and dodecane) by UV-visible spectroscopy at concentrations ranging from 2.5 × 10−6 M to 2 × 10−2 M is reported. Correlation of the variation of half-life for TIPS-pentacene photoxidation with TIPS-pentacene concentration, solubility parameters, dissolved O2 concentrations and intermolecular distances yields important new insight into the processes involved. In particular, a non-linear concentration dependence is observed which points to a further perturbation in solution due to the onset of aggregation. UV-visible spectra for TIPS-pentacene in toluene over a range of concentrations from 270–800 nm in a 10 mm pathlength cuvette are characterized by three long-wavelength bands at 643, 592, and 549 nm (Figure 1a). These spectral features correspond to the known HOMO-LUMO gap with its associated vibrational structure.20, 21 The λmax values of the longest wavelength absorption do not appear to vary with concentration over the range shown but are observed to vary slightly with solvent (Supporting Information, S4.1). Upon photodegradation, these longer wavelength bands decrease with exposure whilst new features grow in below 450 nm. Mass spectra and NMR spectra confirm that the main product is the 6,13-endoperoxide of TIPS-pentacene (Supporting Information, S1); this shows no features in the visible absorption spectra because the conjugated π-system in the product is too short (comprising 2 naphthalene rings). The new features observed below 450 nm are due to small quantities of the 5,14-endoperoxide (effectively a substituted anthracene.6 For each sample, plots of normalized A/A0 at 643 nm versus time were made as shown in Figure 1b. These absorbance-time profiles were found to be reproducible to +/–5%, with all formulations showing retardation in rate beyond t1/2. Comparable decays were also measured in THF, dichloromethane, IPA, chloroform, dodecane and decane over the same concentration range (Supporting Information, S2). Figure 2 shows a summary plot of half-life data for TIPS-pentacene photoxidation at concentrations ranging from 2.5 × 10−6 M to 2 × 10−2 M. For all solvents, shortest half-lives are observed for lowest concentrations, with half-life increasing as concentration increases. For a number of solvents, the curves show inflection, typically between 1 × 10−4 and 5 × 10−4 M. This is particularly pronounced in the case of the chlorinated solvents and toluene. The singlet fission process requires the proximity of a second TIPS-pentacene molecule, which implies that the efficiency of singlet fission should scale with nearest-neighbour distance in pure solvent, which in turn is a function of solution concentration. An estimate of the nearest neighbour distance as a function of TIPS-pentacene concentration can be obtained from cube-root of the concentration (see Supporting Information, S3.1). Figure 3 shows a plot of the half-life versus mean intermolecular distance for the data presented in Figure 2. The variation of lifetime with distance can be seen to be approximately linear up to concentrations around 5 × 10−4 M (corresponding to a nearest neighbour distance of 1.5 × 10−8 m). Below this concentration, the kinetics of the photodegradation process are effectively first order, as shown in Figure 4 which is a plot of ln(A/A0) versus time. From these observations, it is clear that the increase in half-life is (in part) due to an increased likelihood of a second TIPS-pentacene molecules being sufficiently close to participate in triplet formation (and thereby deactivate the singlet state in preference to energy/electron transfer to O2). A second process which can be invoked to explain the reduction in the lifetime of the singlet state is quenching, for which dissolved oxygen is a prime candidate. Once again, a positive correlation exists between the concentration of dissolved oxygen23-25 (expressed as mole-fraction O2 at saturation) and half-life (shown in Figure S4.3 for 1 × 10−5 M), although again the correlation is not high. A clearer picture of the combination of these two processes can be seen from a plot of the product of the HSP and saturation oxygen solubility versus the half-life, as shown in Figure 5. Here, the correlation is much improved. A similarly high correlation is also obtained at 1 × 10−4 M but not at 1 × 10−3 M (see Supporting Information, S4). The reason for this cut-off point is discussed below. It seems clear however that, at low concentration, the initial singlet state is deactivated by both intermolecular processes between TIPS-pentacene molecules and by quenching by dissolved oxygen. Above concentrations of around 2 × 10−4 M, the half-life is observed to increase non-linearly up to the solubility limit and the kinetics of photoxidation are no longer first order (e.g. the 2 × 10−3 M trace in Figure 1(b)). Given the known tendency of acenes to aggregate in solution,26 it seems likely that this behaviour reflects the onset of substantial aggregate formation. Direct evidence for aggregate absorption is not observable in the UV-visible spectra however since it is not possible to record spectra at concentrations above 2 × 10−5 M without saturation. Aggregation would have two principal effects upon photodegradation: first, since proximity to another TIPS-pentacene molecule serves to deactivate the initial excited singlet, molecules associated with aggregates (either on the surface or within the bulk) would therefore be less susceptible to oxidation; second, any molecule within an aggregate is physically separated from O2 in solution and would therefore be incapable of O2 activation. The mode of aggregation is also likely to play a role in determining the concentration-dependence of stability. There are two simple treatments of aggregation that can be considered here: isodesmic, and cooperative.27-29 In the former, aggregation occurs by equilibrium between free monomer and a series of successively higher N-mers (dimer, trimer, teramer etc.) with a single equilibrium constant for the addition of a further monomer to each N-mer. In this case, the number of molecules which are aggregated (i.e. from dimers upwards) increases with concentration according to a predictable model (with a dependence upon the choice of K, which is not known a priori but requires the data to be fitted). If deactivation is linked to isodesmic aggregation, then the half-life should therefore scale linearly with the proportion of non-aggregated molecules (if an appropriate value of K is used). However, there is no value of K that allows the data to be fitted across the entire concentration range for any solvent (see Supporting Information, S3.2). Furthermore, the linearity of the fit to nearest neighbour distance (which would be perturbed by concentration-dependent aggregation) and first-order kinetics suggests that the degree of aggregation is minimal at low concentrations. The second model which has been shown to be applicable to the aggregation of some acenes is that of cooperative aggregation, differing from the isodesmic model in that the equilibrium constant K' for the formation of a dimer is different from that for subsequent aggregate growth (addition of monomer to N-mers of trimer and above). In this case, the proportion of aggregated molecules shows an onset threshold concentration above which aggregation occurs.29 The onset of aggregation should therefore be expected to be accompanied by an increase in half-life. Since this is what is observed here (particularly in the case of the chlorinated solvents, which show a substantial increase in half-life at 1 × 10−4 M), it is concluded that the perturbation which increases the half-life beyond that controlled by solvent quality and quenching (both by nearest-neighbours and O2) is therefore cooperative aggregation with an onset around 2–5 × 10−4 M, with some slight variation between solvents. Indeed, the kinetics of aggregation should depend upon the solvent, with good solvent restricting aggregation (and possibly having an influence on the mode of aggregation). The onset concentration for putative aggregation (∼5 × 10−4 M) in the data presented here lies just below the threshold for efficient singlet fission reported by Walker et al. (>1 × 10−3 M);18 furthermore, the triplet yield versus concentration reported in the above study is visually comparable to the degree of aggregation expected for a cooperative process (cf. Figure 1C in ref. 29 and Figure 3 in ref. 18). It should also be noted that, although Walker et al. discount aggregate formation in their experiments on the basis of DOSY-NMR spectroscopy, there is evidence in the literature that this technique is unlikely to be particularly sensitive to small π-stacked aggregates since the hydrodynamic volume of small aggregates (dimers, trimers etc.) is unlikely to be significantly different from monomers.30, 31 Further experiments are needed to clarify this point. In summary, these measurements clearly demonstrate the effects of solvent quality, oxygen solubility, near-neighbour interactions and aggregation on the photostability of acenes in solution. At low concentration, photoexcited TIPS-pentacene molecules have a lower probability of deactivation and tend to preferentially undergo electron-transfer to O2, leading to short life-times with respect to endoperoxide formation. This effect is mitigated by poor solvent and by high oxygen solubility, which serve to deactivate the initial excited state by singlet fission and quenching respectively. At higher concentrations, photostability is increased by de-excitation as above and also by singlet fission due to the formation of aggregates (which are both incapable of reacting with oxygen and also effectively quench the initial singlet state of TIPS-pentacene, as observed in condensed thin films). These observations have ramifications for device fabrication. If the concentration is too low, the rate of photodegradation is significant and it is likely that decomposition products with unfavourable optical or electronic properties will be incorporated into devices. At higher concentrations, aggregates are present in significant numbers and, although this increases photostability, the incorporation of pre-formed aggregates into films may have implications for the structure (and therefore electronic and/or optical properties) of the resulting devices. However, these effects might be mitigated or controlled by careful manipulation of the solute/solvent blend: such an approach requires a much more sophisticated understanding of the intermolecular interactions in ternary blends. These observations may also go some way to help understand the effect that subtle changes in solvent character in both binary and ternary mixtures can have upon the thin film crystallisation of substituted acenes from solution and their resultant thin film transistor performance.32-34 Further work to examine the photochemistry and photophysics of substituted pentacenes in solution is therefore needed to understand these processes at a molecular level and the interdependency with resultant device performance. TIPS-pentacene was synthesized using the Swager modification of Anthony's synthesis.35 Purified TIPS-pentacene was characterized by a combination of 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopies, UV-visible spectroscopy, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV). Kinetic measurements were performed on purified TIPS-pentacene dissolved in solvent, which had previously been exposed to air for 24 hours by loosening the cap to allow for free exchange of air, over a range of concentrations and formulations. UV-visible spectra were obtained on a Nicolet Evolution 300 spectrometer using 1 cm quartz cells. The cells were protected from light until each experiment began, at which point an initial spectrum was recorded to define A0. The cells were placed on a laboratory bench under conventional 60 W, SP35 fluorescent lighting (General Electric, 2850 lm). The solutions were repeatedly scanned at prescribed intervals until less than 5% of the starting acene remained. For concentrations below 1 × 10−5 M, UV-visible spectra were recorded without further dilution. For solutions at higher concentrations, samples were degraded under the same conditions and further diluted to 1 × 10−5 M immediately prior to the recording of spectra. JM was supported by funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) via a Flagship Grant (FS/01/01/10) from the Innovative Electronic Manufacturing Research Centre, Loughborough. LA was supported by the Libyan Ministry of Education and partial sponsorship by Merck Chemicals Limited. The copyright line for this article was changed on November 18, 2014. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry, University of Manchester Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL UK
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja804515y10.1021/ja804515y ↗
2. 10.1021/cm049060k10.1021/cm049060k ↗
3. 10.1039/b813752h10.1039/b813752h ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sse.2008.12.00210.1016/j.sse.2008.12.002 ↗
5. 10.1039/b901448a10.1039/b901448a ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20050147110.1002/adma.200501471 ↗
7. 10.1021/ja306056x10.1021/ja306056x ↗
8. 10.1002/chem.20080135510.1002/chem.200801355 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20070044310.1002/anie.200700443 ↗
10. 10.1021/cr100261310.1021/cr1002613 ↗
11. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-11013010.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110130 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja208048210.1021/ja2080482 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.19541110.1103/PhysRevB.84.195411 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja201688h10.1021/ja201688h ↗
15. 10.1021/ja208431r10.1021/ja208431r ↗
16. 10.1016/0301-0104(84)80005-110.1016/0301-0104(84)80005-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1386-1425(97)00071-110.1016/S1386-1425(97)00071-1 ↗
18. 10.1038/nchem.180110.1038/nchem.1801 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20130059510.1002/anie.201300595 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00214-010-0821-810.1007/s00214-010-0821-8 ↗
21. 10.1134/S003602440813022010.1134/S0036024408130220 ↗
22. 10.1201/978142000683410.1201/9781420006834 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.55568010.1063/1.555680 ↗
24. 10.1006/jcht.2001.083710.1006/jcht.2001.0837 ↗
25. 10.1021/je800200j10.1021/je800200j ↗
26. 10.1039/c1sm05842h10.1039/c1sm05842h ↗
27. 10.1039/B809359H10.1039/B809359H ↗
28. 10.1039/B308788C10.1039/B308788C ↗
29. 10.1002/chem.20090241510.1002/chem.200902415 ↗
30. 10.1002/chem.20060088910.1002/chem.200600889 ↗
31. 10.1021/jo902013v10.1021/jo902013v ↗
32. R. S.Clough D. H.Redinger J. C.Novack Patent No. WO 2009/151978 A1 2009.
33. 10.1002/adfm.20090135310.1002/adfm.200901353 ↗
34. 10.1039/c0jm01614d10.1039/c0jm01614d ↗
35. 10.1021/ja052828x10.1021/ja052828x ↗