journal article·2019-09Open access

Optimized White Reflectance in Photonic‐Network Structures

Francesco Utel, Lorenzo Cortese, Diederik S. Wiersma, Lorenzo Pattelli

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 7· Issue 18

Abstract

Abstract 3D disordered networks are receiving increasing attention as they represent a versatile architecture for highly scattering materials. However, due to their complex morphology, little is known about the interplay between their structural and optical properties. A simple algorithm that allows for the generation of photonic‐network structures inspired by that of the Cyphochilus beetle, famous for the bright‐white reflectance of its thin cuticular scales, is described. This model allows the degree of structural anisotropy and filling fraction of the network to be varied independently, revealing the key contribution of these two parameters to the overall scattering efficiency. Rigorous numerical simulations show that structures obtained with the use of this algorithm can exceed the broadband reflectance of the beetle while using less material, providing new insight into the design of advanced scattering materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Plant and animal studies · Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

European Laboratory for Non‐linear Spectroscopy (LENS) Università di Firenze 50019 Sesto Fiorentino Italy

Institut de Ciències Fotòniques (ICFO) The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology 08860 Castelldefels Spain

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM) 10135 Torino Italy

Funding

European Research Council · Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.2910.1038/nphoton.2013.29 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.20390310.1103/PhysRevLett.115.203903 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.04387110.1103/PhysRevA.96.043871 ↗
4. 10.1364/OPTICA.5.00103710.1364/OPTICA.5.001037 ↗
5. 10.1038/srep0607510.1038/srep06075 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.497448110.1063/1.4974481 ↗
7. 10.1038/srep4663710.1038/srep46637 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170205710.1002/adma.201702057 ↗
9. Zou W. · Adv. Funct. Mater.
10. 10.1063/1.47340410.1063/1.473404 ↗
11. 10.1021/je500119r10.1021/je500119r ↗
12. 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.01.03610.1016/j.powtec.2016.01.036 ↗
13. 10.1002/adom.20150017310.1002/adom.201500173 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl802580r10.1021/nl802580r ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.04382210.1103/PhysRevA.88.043822 ↗
16. 10.1002/mame.20180023710.1002/mame.201800237 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20170690110.1002/adfm.201706901 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.06381810.1103/PhysRevA.84.063818 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00339-016-0703-610.1007/s00339-016-0703-6 ↗
20. 10.1038/ncomms1443910.1038/ncomms14439 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.113466610.1126/science.1134666 ↗
22. 10.1364/OE.19.02406110.1364/OE.19.024061 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.05191710.1103/PhysRevE.83.051917 ↗
24. 10.1364/AO.49.00424610.1364/AO.49.004246 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.11.00810.1016/j.cpc.2009.11.008 ↗
26. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/02303610.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023036 ↗
27. 10.1088/0031-9155/40/6/00110.1088/0031-9155/40/6/001 ↗
28. 10.1364/AO.39.00120210.1364/AO.39.001202 ↗
29. 10.1364/AO.45.00106210.1364/AO.45.001062 ↗
30. 10.1117/1.JBO.18.3.03700310.1117/1.JBO.18.3.037003 ↗
31. 10.1049/PBEW047E10.1049/PBEW047E ↗
32. Fetzer J. H. · 2010 · 16310.1007/978-90-481-3615-5_7 ↗
33. Johnson A. T. · J. Biomed. Eng. · 2013 · 7 · 6
34. 10.1063/1.504819410.1063/1.5048194 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.04180410.1103/PhysRevE.83.041804 ↗