The True Value of Disorder
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Border regions between areas where physical problems involve very few bodies with well‐described interactions or immensely many (amenable to statistical description) are prone to fall in the category usually associated with complexity. Disorder is an important factor to consider when examining complexity. Disordered optical materials per se would not qualify as complex but when disorder is partial or merely incipient or nonlinear interactions are included, an entirely new character is added. Here, attention is paid to three examples of these kinds of optical systems. The propagation of light through diffusive media and image formation behind an opaque screen is proposed as a problem where an exact computable solution can be expected but is impractical. Analysis shows that the problem is akin to condensed matter physics concepts related to narrow leads conductance. Another condensed matter related phenomenon brought to photonics is that of localization: disorder can induce a cessation of transport when interference of scattered fields is destructive in all directions forcing light to be exponentially confined. Finally, random lasers are a problem where a disordered, open, photonic system is governed by immensely many modes interacting nonlinearly.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Random lasers and scattering media · Neural dynamics and brain function · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Donostia International Physics Centre (DIPC) Paseo Manuel de Lardizábal 4 E‐20018 Donostia/San Sebastián Spain
Funding
Comunidad de Madrid
References (98)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.112649310.1126/science.1126493 ↗
2. Weaver W. · Am. Sci. · 1948 · 36 · 536
3. 10.1038/nphys218810.1038/nphys2188 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.115694010.1126/science.1156940 ↗
5. Wolfram S. · Phys. D · 1995 · 10 · 140
6. Lewes G. H. · 1875
7. 10.1080/0010751050005244410.1080/00107510500052444 ↗
8. A notorious example is that of Kolmogorov complexity in algorithmic information theory independently and previously described by A. Solomonov. See [14] below.
9. 10.1007/978-3-540-71874-110.1007/978-3-540-71874-1 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0066882110.1007/BF00668821 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00025-410.1016/S0370-1573(01)00025-4 ↗
12. Shannon C. E. · 1949
13. Solomonov R. J. · Inf. Control · 1964 · 7 · 110.1016/S0019-9958(64)90223-2 ↗
14. Kolmogorov A. N. · Probl. Inf. Transm. · 1965 · 1 · I
15. 10.1145/321356.32136310.1145/321356.321363 ↗
16. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.2910.1038/nphoton.2013.29 ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.19.00481510.1364/OE.19.004815 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.01390110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.013901 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20100035610.1002/adma.201000356 ↗
20. 10.1038/nphys219010.1038/nphys2190 ↗
21. 10.1107/S205252061500840910.1107/S2052520615008409 ↗
22. 10.1142/039110.1142/0391 ↗
23. 10.1088/0034-4885/45/6/00110.1088/0034-4885/45/6/001 ↗
24. 10.1142/039110.1142/0391 ↗
25. Here an area in a 2D space is defined by a line that intersects one axis at one lattice unit and the perpendicular axis at √2 (a square diagonal marked by the circumference) and an arbitrary width. Since √2 is irrational the line will never pass through another lattice point. All lattice points inside the area are projected on the line defining a 1D quasicrystal.
26. Brodsky M. H. · 1979
27. The declaration of 2014 as the international year of Crystallography and 2015 international year of Light is at the very least a happy coincidence.
28. Much in the way rational numbers among real ones that are infinite but countable.
29. 10.1103/PhysRev.65.19510.1103/PhysRev.65.195 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.02020310.1103/PhysRevB.79.020203 ↗
31. 10.1038/lsa.2016.17210.1038/lsa.2016.172 ↗
32. 10.1080/0950034960823067410.1080/09500349608230674 ↗
33. J. A.Pariente F.Bayat C.Pecharomán A.Blanco A.García‐Martín C.López arXiv:1607.088902016.
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.04111310.1103/PhysRevE.68.041113 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.02272110.1103/PhysRevE.89.022721 ↗
36. Recall the way in which states or density of states are counted in solid state physics or photonics by deriving the number of allowed states which typically leads to akd−1dependence.
37. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/41/41401210.1088/0953-8984/28/41/414012 ↗
38. 10.1073/pnas.090774410610.1073/pnas.0907744106 ↗
39. According to the Wiener‐Khinchin theorem the power spectral densityS(f) for a functionx(t) is the Fourier transform of the autocorrelationrxx(τ) = ⟨x(t)x(t − τ)⟩.
40. Ioffe A. F. · Prog. Semicond. · 1960 · 4 · 237
41. 10.1103/RevModPhys.64.96110.1103/RevModPhys.64.961 ↗
42. Mandelbrot B. B. · 1977
43. 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.38110.1103/RevModPhys.66.381 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0145717910.1007/BF01457179 ↗
45. 10.1007/BF0144803010.1007/BF01448030 ↗
46. 10.1088/0305-4470/10/11/00810.1088/0305-4470/10/11/008 ↗
47. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.310.1038/nphoton.2010.3 ↗
48. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.15910.1038/nphoton.2012.159 ↗
49. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.8810.1038/nphoton.2012.88 ↗
50. 10.1201/EBK143980858010.1201/EBK1439808580 ↗
51. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.20410.1038/nphoton.2010.204 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.149910.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1499 ↗
53. Kogelnik H. · J. Opt. Soc. Am. A · 1968 · 1
54. Yaqoob Z. · Nature · 2008 · 2 · 1
55. 10.1007/BF0295617310.1007/BF02956173 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.02390210.1103/PhysRevLett.107.023902 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.19390510.1103/PhysRevLett.106.193905 ↗
58. 10.1038/nature1157810.1038/nature11578 ↗
59. 10.1121/1.42945910.1121/1.429459 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.10060110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.100601 ↗
61. 10.1103/RevModPhys.69.73110.1103/RevModPhys.69.731 ↗
62. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525820.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525820.001.0001 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRev.109.149210.1103/PhysRev.109.1492 ↗
64. 10.1038/nphys110110.1038/nphys1101 ↗
65. 10.1038/nature0700010.1038/nature07000 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.248610.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2486 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.320609110.1063/1.3206091 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.67310.1103/PhysRevLett.42.673 ↗
69. 10.1038/3500905510.1038/35009055 ↗
70. 10.1038/nature0562310.1038/nature05623 ↗
71. 10.1038/3775710.1038/37757 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.06390410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.063904 ↗
73. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.31310.1038/nphoton.2012.313 ↗
74. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/01303910.1088/1367-2630/18/1/013039 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.02390510.1103/PhysRevLett.112.023905 ↗
76. 10.1002/andp.1901309031010.1002/andp.19013090310 ↗
77. 10.1038/187493a010.1038/187493a0 ↗
78. 10.1109/JQE.1966.107412310.1109/JQE.1966.1074123 ↗
79. Letokhov S. · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1968 · 26 · 835
80. 10.1364/JOSAB.10.00235810.1364/JOSAB.10.002358 ↗
81. 10.1038/368436a010.1038/368436a0 ↗
82. 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.425610.1103/PhysRevE.54.4256 ↗
83. 10.1038/nphys97110.1038/nphys971 ↗
84. 10.1038/nnano.2014.3410.1038/nnano.2014.34 ↗
85. 10.1002/adma.20090362310.1002/adma.200903623 ↗
86. 10.1039/c2nr30335c10.1039/c2nr30335c ↗
87. 10.1002/adma.20130312210.1002/adma.201303122 ↗
88. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.227810.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2278 ↗
89. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.6710.1038/nphoton.2009.67 ↗
90. 10.1126/science.115531110.1126/science.1155311 ↗
91. 10.1002/adma.20060242610.1002/adma.200602426 ↗
92. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.10210.1038/nphoton.2008.102 ↗
93. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.21710.1038/nphoton.2011.217 ↗
94. 10.1038/ncomms277710.1038/ncomms2777 ↗
95. 10.1038/ncomms705810.1038/ncomms7058 ↗
96. 10.1038/srep1684810.1038/srep16848 ↗
97. 10.1364/OE.23.02995410.1364/OE.23.029954 ↗
98. 10.1073/pnas.141967211210.1073/pnas.1419672112 ↗