journal article·2017-01

A Complete Quantitative Analysis of Spatio‐Temporal Dynamics of Excitons in Functional Organic Light‐Emitting Diodes

Amrita Dey, Akshay Rao, Dinesh Kabra

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 5· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The spatio-temporal dynamics of excitons in functional polymer light-emitting diodes reveal that singlet–triplet annihilation (STA) is significantly higher than the often invoked singlet–polaron annihilation (SPA). STA holds back the efficiencies of PLEDs and further realization of organic injection lasers. Additional singlets are found in F8BT that are related to thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF), as triplet–triplet annihilation (TTA) alone cannot account for the observed high external quantum efficiencies. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology BombayPowai Mumbai 400076 India

Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge JJ Thomson Avenue Cambridge CB3 0HE UK

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/1639310.1038/16393 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.37377910.1063/1.373779 ↗
3. 10.1098/rsta.2014.032110.1098/rsta.2014.0321 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.3110.1038/nphoton.2012.31 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1168710.1038/nature11687 ↗
6. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.1210.1038/nphoton.2014.12 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.327340710.1063/1.3273407 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.07660210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.076602 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.356143010.1063/1.3561430 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.04520910.1103/PhysRevB.85.045209 ↗
11. 10.1038/nchem.194510.1038/nchem.1945 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.26740410.1103/PhysRevLett.108.267404 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20100031710.1002/adma.201000317 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20120085010.1002/adfm.201200850 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms584010.1038/ncomms5840 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20110460210.1002/adma.201104602 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.23521510.1103/PhysRevB.77.235215 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.13740210.1103/PhysRevLett.112.137402 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja051891j10.1021/ja051891j ↗
20. 10.1080/0950034980823061410.1080/09500349808230614 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)01109-510.1016/S0009-2614(01)01109-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mser.2009.09.00110.1016/j.mser.2009.09.001 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja908046h10.1021/ja908046h ↗
24. 10.1063/1.150710710.1063/1.1507107 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20130075310.1002/adma.201300753 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20100258510.1002/adfm.201002585 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.139662710.1063/1.1396627 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.12521210.1103/PhysRevB.71.125212 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.04.00710.1016/j.orgel.2006.04.007 ↗
30. 10.1038/3510156510.1038/35101565 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat188510.1038/nmat1885 ↗