journal article·2025-11Open access

Step Function in Momentum Space by a Metagrating

Mahmoud A. A. Abouelatta, Sergejs Boroviks, Olivier J. F. Martin, Karim Achouri

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 13· Issue 32

Abstract

Abstract Metasurface research has shown significant potential for controlling the polarization, amplitude, phase, and propagation direction of light. Nevertheless, control over the angular response of incident light remains a long‐standing problem. In this work, the potential of diffractive systems for obtaining a step function in momentum space is shown, where the mirror symmetry of the angular transmittance is broken. By engineering the scattering response of an asymmetric particle in a metagrating, such a step function can be obtained in a passive, reciprocal, and lossless fashion. More specifically, the metagrating performs filtering in momentum space with an abrupt switching from reflection to transmission for an incident electromagnetic wave with an arbitrary spatial profile. This metagrating may find diverse applications in optical spatial analog computing. Moreover, it paves the way for exploring the capabilities of diffractive systems for gaining full control over the angular response of light using arbitrary momentum transfer functions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Advanced Electromagnetics and Photonics École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne 1015 Switzerland

Nanophotonics and Metrology Laboratory École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne 1015 Switzerland

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.123200910.1126/science.1232009 ↗
2. 10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/07640110.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.25610310.1103/PhysRevLett.117.256103 ↗
4. 10.1109/TAP.2019.294342310.1109/TAP.2019.2943423 ↗
5. 10.1109/TAP.2022.321390710.1109/TAP.2022.3213907 ↗
6. 10.1109/TAP.2021.307852110.1109/TAP.2021.3078521 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41566-020-0591-310.1038/s41566-020-0591-3 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2017.9610.1038/nphoton.2017.96 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.07514210.1103/PhysRevB.94.075142 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.08543810.1103/PhysRevB.96.085438 ↗
11. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-028510.1515/nanoph-2020-0285 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41578-020-00243-210.1038/s41578-020-00243-2 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.121071310.1126/science.1210713 ↗
14. Mohammadi Estakhri N. · Phys. Rev. X · 2016 · 6
15. Asadchy V. · Phys. Rev. X · 2017 · 7
16. Liu F. · IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. · 2023
17. 10.1109/TAP.2021.307626710.1109/TAP.2021.3076267 ↗
18. 10.1109/TAP.2018.279395810.1109/TAP.2018.2793958 ↗
19. 10.1109/TAP.2016.258849510.1109/TAP.2016.2588495 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.06740410.1103/PhysRevLett.119.067404 ↗
21. 10.1109/JPHOT.2021.313620210.1109/JPHOT.2021.3136202 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.01390110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.013901 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.04406410.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.044064 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.25680210.1103/PhysRevLett.121.256802 ↗
25. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-071010.1515/nanoph-2021-0710 ↗
26. Cordaro A. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2023 · 1
27. 10.1364/OL.40.00349210.1364/OL.40.003492 ↗
28. 10.1364/OL.43603310.1364/OL.436033 ↗
29. 10.1002/lpor.20230018210.1002/lpor.202300182 ↗
30. E.Sakr S.Dhaka P.Bermel inPhysics Simulation and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices V vol.9743 SPIE2016 pp.217–224.10.1117/12.2211035 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0571010.1021/acsnano.5b05710 ↗
32. It may also be achieved with a structure with fully broken symmetry at the cost of a more complicated fabrication procedure.
33. 10.1002/lpor.20210063310.1002/lpor.202100633 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41566-022-01098-510.1038/s41566-022-01098-5 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10492-013-0014-610.1007/s10492-013-0014-6 ↗