Phase‐Shifted Bragg Gratings from High Refractive Index Chalcogenide Hybrid Inorganic/Polymers: Fabrication and Thermo‐Optic Characterization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the first fabrication of phase‐shifted Bragg gratings utilizing chalcogenide hybrid inorganic/organic polymers (CHIPs) is presented based on poly(sulfur‐random‐(1,3‐isopropenylbenzene) to measure the thermo‐optic coefficient (TOC) of this new class of optical polymers. The unique properties of CHIPs, such as high index contrast and low optical losses, are leveraged to fabricate Bragg gratings that enable precise determination of the TOC and glass transition temperature (Tg) of these polymers. The optical measurement introduces a novel technique to measure the TOC and Tg of optical polymers which can be difficult to determine using traditional methods such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) after fabrication into photonic device constructs. The findings demonstrate that CHIPs exhibit low thermo‐optic (TO) effects, making them exceptionally well‐suited for the development of thermally stable photonic integrated circuits.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Liquid Crystal Research Advancements · Synthesis and properties of polymers · Photonic and Optical Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
J. C. Wyant College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona Tucson AZ 85721 USA
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Arizona Tucson AZ 85721 USA
Funding
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate · Division of Materials Research · Directorate for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1364/OE.27.01115210.1364/OE.27.011152 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0002210.1021/acsphotonics.8b00022 ↗
3. 10.1109/JLT.2016.263974010.1109/JLT.2016.2639740 ↗
4. 10.1109/JSTQE.2018.281260310.1109/JSTQE.2018.2812603 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41377-020-00435-z10.1038/s41377-020-00435-z ↗
6. 10.1038/pj.2010.4510.1038/pj.2010.45 ↗
7. Li Y. · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2020 · 34 · 50
8. 10.1021/ac050227i10.1021/ac050227i ↗
9. 10.1038/nchem.162410.1038/nchem.1624 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20130560710.1002/adma.201305607 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0024510.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00245 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0022510.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00225 ↗
13. 10.1002/adom.20220017610.1002/adom.202200176 ↗
14. 10.1364/OSAC.41367210.1364/OSAC.413672 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.473898910.1063/1.4738989 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.03510.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.035 ↗
17. 10.1088/1742-6596/253/1/01202810.1088/1742-6596/253/1/012028 ↗
18. 10.1109/68.75254410.1109/68.752544 ↗
19. 10.1364/OE.22.00548310.1364/OE.22.005483 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b0060210.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00602 ↗
21. 10.1021/mz500678m10.1021/mz500678m ↗
22. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b0050210.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00502 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-023-43117-110.1038/s41467-023-43117-1 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20220937710.1002/adma.202209377 ↗