journal article·2023-02

Crosstalk‐Free Mesa‐Etched Passive‐Matrix Microscale Light‐Emitting Diode Array Using Yttrium‐Iron Garnet P‐Type Resistive‐Switching Electrodes

Jun Young Kim, Ho Jin Lee, Kyung Rock Son, Min Ji Yu, Seok Hee Hong, Tae Geun Kim

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 11· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Microscale light‐emitting diodes (µLEDs) have ushered in a new era of small‐sized high‐resolution displays by integrating numerous microscale pixels within a limited panel area. However, to realize passive‐matrix‐based high‐resolution µLED displays, it is important to prevent image diffusion (crosstalk) between the pixels. Herein, p‐type resistive‐switching (RS) electrodes are introduced in a mesa‐etched passive‐matrix‐based µLED array structure to block electrical interference between adjacent pixels and eliminate cross‐talk. To distinguish between addressed and unaddressed pixels in the µLED array structure, the resistance state of the RS electrode is modulated from low (52 Ω) to high (1.2 × 107 Ω). Moreover, the RS electrode exhibits a high on/off ratio (106), good retention (105 s), and stable endurance (104 cycles). X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis reveals that the switching mechanism in the RS electrodes is achieved by the generation and annihilation of oxygen vacancies in the conductive path. Consequently, the fabricated µLEDs with RS electrodes exhibit a 93.1% higher electroluminescence intensity and 95.3% higher light output power compared to a reference device fabricated through combined mesa‐ and isolation‐etching.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electrical Engineering Korea University Anam‐ro 145 Seoul 02841 Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41377-020-0268-110.1038/s41377-020-0268-1 ↗
2. 10.3390/app809155710.3390/app8091557 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.09.05210.1016/j.jlumin.2016.09.052 ↗
4. 10.3390/nano1012248210.3390/nano10122482 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41377-020-0341-910.1038/s41377-020-0341-9 ↗
6. 10.1109/TED.2019.293355210.1109/TED.2019.2933552 ↗
7. 10.1364/OE.27.0A130810.1364/OE.27.0A1308 ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.46.245410.1143/JJAP.46.2454 ↗
9. 10.1088/1361-6528/abcd6010.1088/1361-6528/abcd60 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20160600510.1002/adfm.201606005 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0638710.1021/acsnano.5b06387 ↗
12. Lee V.‐W. · J. Inf. Disp. · 2016 · 32 · 16
13. 10.1039/C9NR04423J10.1039/C9NR04423J ↗
14. Guo W. · JOM‐J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. · 2015 · 107 · 171103
15. Chen P.‐W. · IEEE Photon. J. · 2020 · 12 · 7000711
16. 10.1143/JJAP.44.723410.1143/JJAP.44.7234 ↗
17. 10.1116/1.58231310.1116/1.582313 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41378-020-00198-y10.1038/s41378-020-00198-y ↗
19. 10.1002/admt.20210088910.1002/admt.202100889 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cap.2018.10.02110.1016/j.cap.2018.10.021 ↗
21. 10.1088/1361-6641/ab2c0910.1088/1361-6641/ab2c09 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15376210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153762 ↗
23. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab302410.1088/2053-1591/ab3024 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ssc.2011.08.03610.1016/j.ssc.2011.08.036 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.13788910.1016/j.tsf.2020.137889 ↗
26. 10.1038/srep3832410.1038/srep38324 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRev.103.164810.1103/PhysRev.103.1648 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.474289710.1063/1.4742897 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.496290610.1063/1.4962906 ↗
30. 10.1039/C7RA00242D10.1039/C7RA00242D ↗
31. 10.1038/srep2147810.1038/srep21478 ↗
32. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/16/16200110.1088/0022-3727/42/16/162001 ↗
33. 10.1002/aelm.20180041810.1002/aelm.201800418 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.487062710.1063/1.4870627 ↗
35. 10.1186/s11671-019-3229-y10.1186/s11671-019-3229-y ↗
36. 10.1007/s40820-021-00735-y10.1007/s40820-021-00735-y ↗