journal article·2024-05Open access

Optical Crosstalk Suppression in High‐Resolution Quantum Dot Light‐Emitting Devices

Yueting Zheng, Lihua Lin, Hailong Hu, Tailiang Guo, Fushan Li

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 12· Issue 15

Abstract

Abstract High‐resolution (HR) displays are in much demand as metaverse makes near‐eye displays the most important equipment in recent years. Based on wave optics, a microscale optical crosstalk model for HR display devices is proposed. It is indicated that the pixel pattern will be distorted over long‐distance transmission in light‐emitting devices with inner periodic microstructure, and the optical distortion is related to the size of pixels and the distance from the emitting layer to the outlet. A bottom emissive HR red quantum dot light‐emitting diode (QLED) array is introduced to confirm the model and a top emission scheme is provided to effectively reduce the transmission distance and suppress the pixel distortion. Optical‐crosstalk‐free pixels are finally achieved by adopting the optimized top‐emission cathode thickness of 30 nm. This study provides a direction for realizing high‐quality and high‐resolution micro‐displays.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Optoelectronic Technology Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 China

Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China Fuzhou 350108 China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fujian Science and Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41377-020-0341-910.1038/s41377-020-0341-9 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40843-022-2410-410.1007/s40843-022-2410-4 ↗
3. 10.1002/admt.20220107010.1002/admt.202201070 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41377-021-00658-810.1038/s41377-021-00658-8 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41377-022-00851-310.1038/s41377-022-00851-3 ↗
6. N. W.Melena J. T.Wiersma inProc. SPIE Optical Architectures for Displays and Sensing in Augmented Virtual and Mixed Reality (AR VR MR) II(Eds.:B. C.Kress C.Peroz) Electr Network 2021 1176.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/21951071/homepage/author‐guidelines
7. 10.1002/jsid.65810.1002/jsid.658 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10139710.1016/j.isci.2020.101397 ↗
9. 10.1002/cne.90292040210.1002/cne.902920402 ↗
10. 10.1002/lpor.20210030010.1002/lpor.202100300 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.04.00910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.04.009 ↗
12. 10.1002/adom.20220314910.1002/adom.202203149 ↗
13. 10.1039/C8NR02082E10.1039/C8NR02082E ↗
14. 10.1016/j.orgel.2022.10670510.1016/j.orgel.2022.106705 ↗
15. He Y. · Optoelectron. Lett. · 2020 · 16 · 2004
16. 10.1002/jsid.45610.1002/jsid.456 ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.46309510.1364/OE.463095 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.optcom.2022.12836310.1016/j.optcom.2022.128363 ↗
19. Meng T. · Nat. Photonics · 2022 · 16 · 2973
20. 10.1038/nature1382910.1038/nature13829 ↗
21. 10.1002/adom.20220205810.1002/adom.202202058 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.11.01910.1016/j.orgel.2009.11.019 ↗
23. 10.1166/jno.2016.186410.1166/jno.2016.1864 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0033210.1021/acsaelm.0c00332 ↗
25. 10.1080/15980316.2021.187617310.1080/15980316.2021.1876173 ↗
26. Richard W. V. · Opt. Eng. · 1984 · 23 · 343
27. Nieminen J. A. · Surf. Sci. Lett. · 1987 · 185 · L489
28. 10.1088/0256-307X/32/7/07780210.1088/0256-307X/32/7/077802 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20210015110.1002/adfm.202100151 ↗
30. 10.3390/mi1309147810.3390/mi13091478 ↗