journal article·2024-04Open access

Chiral Light in Twisted Fabry–Pérot Cavities

Sergey A. Dyakov, Natalia S. Salakhova, Alexey V. Ignatov, Ilia M. Fradkin, Vitaly P. Panov, Jang‐Kun Song, Nikolay A. Gippius

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 12· Issue 12

Abstract

Abstract Fundamental studies of the interaction of chiral light with chiral matter are important for the development of techniques that allow handedness‐selective optical detection of chiral organic molecules. One approach to achieve this goal is the creation of a Fabry–Pérot cavity that supports eigenmodes with a desired electromagnetic handedness. This paper theoretically studies chiral Fabry–Pérot cavities with mirrors comprising 1D photonic crystal slabs made of van der Waals As2S3, a material with one of the highest known in‐plane anisotropies. By utilizing the anisotropy provided by As2S3, Fabry–Pérot cavities with constitutional and configurational chiralities are designed. It is demonstrated that in cavities with constitutional chirality, electromagnetic modes of left or right handedness exist due to the chirality of both mirrors, often referred to as handedness preserving mirrors in the literature. At the same time, cavities with configurational chirality support modes of both handednesses due to the chiral morphology of the entire structure, set by the twist angle between the optical axes of the upper and lower non‐chiral anisotropic mirrors. The developed chiral Fabry–Pérot cavities can be tuned to any distance between the mirrors by properly twisting them, making such systems a prospective platform for the coupling of chiral light with chiral matter.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular spectroscopy and chirality · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Terahertz technology and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Engineering Physics Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Bolshoy Boulevard 30, str. 1 Moscow 143025 Russia

Center for Photonics and 2D Materials Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Institutskiy pereulok 9 Moscow Region 141701 Russia

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Sungkyunkwan University Suwon Gyeonggi‐do 16419 Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Russian Science Foundation

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Kelvin W. T. B. · 1894
2. 10.59566/IJBS.2006.208510.59566/IJBS.2006.2085 ↗
3. 10.1146/annurev.pc.20.100169.00220310.1146/annurev.pc.20.100169.002203 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.02170210.1103/PhysRevE.68.021702 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.01170110.1103/PhysRevE.74.011701 ↗
6. Actually liquid crystal molecules are also chiral but optical effects of configurational chirality can significantly dominate over constitutional chirality when the periodicity of the structure is close to the wavelength used.
7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.02180310.1103/PhysRevA.83.021803 ↗
8. Barron L. D. · 2009
9. 10.1201/978020302634210.1201/9780203026342 ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.00104510.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001045 ↗
11. 10.1038/nnano.2010.20910.1038/nnano.2010.209 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.120281710.1126/science.1202817 ↗
13. 10.1002/1521-4095(200107)13:12/13<889::AID-ADMA889>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/1521-4095(200107)13:12/13<889::AID-ADMA889>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
14. 10.1002/chir.2039910.1002/chir.20399 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.16390110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.163901 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.23541610.1103/PhysRevB.98.235416 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0113010.1021/acsphotonics.1c01130 ↗
18. 10.1063/5.008578610.1063/5.0085786 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0201110.1021/acsphotonics.2c02011 ↗
20. 10.1038/nature2103710.1038/nature21037 ↗
21. 10.1088/0034-4885/66/6/20110.1088/0034-4885/66/6/201 ↗
22. 10.1038/ncomms368910.1038/ncomms3689 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.02409010.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024090 ↗
24. 10.1364/JOSAA.16.00118410.1364/JOSAA.16.001184 ↗
25. I. M.Fradkin A. A.Demenev A. V.Kovalchuk V. D.Kulakovskii V. N.Antonov S. A.Dyakov N. A.Gippius arXiv:2312.058652023.
26. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-037210.1515/nanoph-2019-0372 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.125767110.1126/science.1257671 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0176710.1021/acsphotonics.8b01767 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja409544510.1021/ja4095445 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0145410.1021/acsphotonics.8b01454 ↗
31. 10.1002/lpor.20200024210.1002/lpor.202000242 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.20300310.1103/PhysRevLett.114.203003 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.125469910.1126/science.1254699 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms942210.1038/ncomms9422 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20180774210.1002/adma.201807742 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.05385010.1103/PhysRevA.94.053850 ↗
37. 10.1002/adom.20220286510.1002/adom.202202865 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.05740210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.057402 ↗
39. 10.3390/sym1206089610.3390/sym12060896 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-022-31877-110.1038/s41467-022-31877-1 ↗
41. 10.1186/s43074-022-00057-110.1186/s43074-022-00057-1 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.03320110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.033201 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.492196910.1063/1.4921969 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41377-020-0256-510.1038/s41377-020-0256-5 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20190798310.1002/adma.201907983 ↗
46. 10.1002/adom.20200024710.1002/adom.202000247 ↗
47. 10.1002/adom.20210079710.1002/adom.202100797 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0013410.1021/acsphotonics.2c00134 ↗
49. 10.1039/D1SC04341B10.1039/D1SC04341B ↗
50. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0078010.1021/acsphotonics.1c00780 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.L02150110.1103/PhysRevA.107.L021501 ↗
52. A. S.Slavich G. A.Ermolaev M. K.Tatmyshevskiy A. N.Toksumakov O. G.Matveeva D. V.Grudinin A.Mazitov K. V.Kravtsov A. V.Syuy D. M.Tsymbarenko M. S.Mironov S. M.Novikov I.Kruglov D. A.Ghazaryan A. A.Vyshnevyy A. V.Arsenin V. S.Volkov K. S.Novoselov arXiv:2309.019892023.
53. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.05381110.1103/PhysRevA.82.053811 ↗
54. Fernandez‐Corbaton I. · Phys. Rev. X · 2016 · 6
55. Field intensity and chirality density are expressed in Gaussian units as ref. [56]:I=116π(E⃗E·E⃗E∗+H⃗H·H⃗H∗)andC=ω2c2Im(E⃗E·H⃗H∗)$ \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{ll}I &= \frac{1}{16\pi }(\vec{E}\hspace{1.111pt}\vphantom{E}\cdot \vec{E}\hspace{1.111pt}\vphantom{E}^* + \vec{H}\hspace{1.111pt}\vphantom{H}\cdot \vec{H}\hspace{1.111pt}\vphantom{H}^*) \qquad{\rm {and}}\\C &= \frac{\omega }{2c^2}\nobreakspace \mathrm{Im}(\vec{E}\hspace{1.111pt}\vphantom{E}\cdot \vec{H}\hspace{1.111pt}\vphantom{H}^*)\end{array} $In plottingIandCwe omit the factors 1/16π and ω/2c2and set the incoming amplitudes of electric and magnetic fields to 1.
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.04390110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.043901 ↗
57. Lindell I. · 1994
58. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0028610.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00286 ↗