Direct Observation of Lateral Field Confinement in Symmetry‐Protected THz Bound States in the Continuum
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Electromagnetic field confinement on sub‐wavelength scales is possible at the expense of increasing optical losses. Examples are surface plasmon polaritons and resonant structures, which suffer from absorption losses and radiative outcoupling, respectively. Here, the first experimental evidence of strong electromagnetic field confinement along the lateral (out‐of‐plane) direction in a near lossless metasurface that supports a symmetry‐protected Bound State in the Continuum is shown, which fully suppresses the radiative losses of resonant scatterers. This experimental demonstration, supported by coupled dipole calculations, is measured by a double near‐field probe technique to locally excite and detect the time evolution and confinement of the electric field onto the surface, achieving an amplitude decay length from the metasurface of λ/38 at 0.39 THz.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physics and Science Education and Eindhoven Hendrik Casimir Institute Eindhoven University of Technology P.O. Box 513 Eindhoven 5600 MB The Netherlands
Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (IEM‐CSIC) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Serrano 121 Madrid 28006 Spain
Physics Department Fribourg University Chemin de Musée 3 Fribourg 1700 Switzerland
Funding
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek · Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.195105710.1063/1.1951057 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aag199210.1126/science.aag1992 ↗
3. Jeon T. I. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 1
4. 10.1126/science.109899910.1126/science.1098999 ↗
5. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.30110.1038/nphoton.2007.301 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0193710.1038/nature01937 ↗
7. 10.1002/lpor.20081001810.1002/lpor.200810018 ↗
8. 10.1364/AOP.1.00043810.1364/AOP.1.000438 ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20100104410.1002/smll.201001044 ↗
10. 10.1021/cr200061k10.1021/cr200061k ↗
11. 10.1126/science.111188610.1126/science.1111886 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aar843810.1126/science.aar8438 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2012.5110.1038/nnano.2012.51 ↗
14. 10.1038/nature1797410.1038/nature17974 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0012110.1021/acsphotonics.6b00121 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0024310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00243 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.09.00210.1016/j.mattod.2017.09.002 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0503110.1021/acsnano.9b05031 ↗
19. 10.3390/photonics603007510.3390/photonics6030075 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.revip.2021.10005110.1016/j.revip.2021.100051 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.18390210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.183902 ↗
22. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.4810.1038/natrevmats.2016.48 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.16111310.1103/PhysRevB.98.161113 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.aas976810.1126/science.aas9768 ↗
25. 10.1038/nature2079910.1038/nature20799 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41565-018-0245-510.1038/s41565-018-0245-5 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.16511110.1103/PhysRevB.89.165111 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41566-018-0177-510.1038/s41566-018-0177-5 ↗
29. Z.Dong Z.Mahfoud R.Paniagua‐Domínguez H.Wang A. I.Fernández‐Domínguez S.Gorelik S. T.Ha F.Tjiptoharsono A. I.Kuznetsov M.Bosman J. K. W.Yang arXiv:2105.042202021.
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0093710.1021/acsphotonics.1c00937 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.496290510.1063/1.4962905 ↗
32. 10.1364/OPTICA.6.00099610.1364/OPTICA.6.000996 ↗
33. 10.1364/OE.26.03152310.1364/OE.26.031523 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.12541110.1103/PhysRevB.102.125411 ↗
35. 10.3390/nano1104099810.3390/nano11040998 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.19390310.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903 ↗
37. 10.1002/adom.20190157210.1002/adom.201901572 ↗