Nonlinear Optical Mechanism of β‐BaB2O4 Revealed by Experimental Electron Density
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nonlinear optical (NLO) materials are of immense scientific and technological importance. However, debate has long prevailed theoretically regarding the structural origin of the second harmonic generation (SHG) effect. In this work, the experimental electron density (ED) of controversial β‐BaB2O4 (BBO) is studied by high‐resolution X‐ray diffraction, indicating that the [B3O6]3− motif dominates two large non‐zero SHG tensors (d222 and d311) while Ba atoms contribute mostly to the smallest one (d333), and the atomic SHG contributions of terminal O atoms in [B3O6]3− motifs are much larger than those of B and bridged O atoms, clarifying the disputes on its NLO response mechanism. Besides, the contraction of inner electron shells (5s25p6) of the Ba atom and partial covalent behavior of the Ba─O interaction are first observed experimentally. Furthermore, the SHG coefficients of BBO derived from experimental ED are in excellent agreement with those from bulk crystals, providing a high‐efficient and low‐cost method of screening high‐performance NLO materials with just an easy‐to‐obtain tiny crystal.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Crystal Structures and Properties · High-pressure geophysics and materials · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter Chinese Academy of Sciences Fuzhou Fujian 350002 P. R. China
School of Chemistry Fuzhou University Fuzhou Fujian 350108 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.12.01310.1016/j.ccr.2016.12.013 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0079610.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00796 ↗
3. 10.1093/nsr/nwac01710.1093/nsr/nwac017 ↗
4. 10.1080/0144235890935322310.1080/01442358909353223 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20171146510.1002/anie.201711465 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0CP02755C10.1039/D0CP02755C ↗
7. Chen C.‐T. · Sci Sin · 1985 · 28 · 235
8. 10.1088/0953-8984/13/23/20110.1088/0953-8984/13/23/201 ↗
9. 10.7498/aps.34.82310.7498/aps.34.823 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.849610.1103/PhysRevB.44.8496 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.35284110.1063/1.352841 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.152710.1103/PhysRevB.57.1527 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1769510.1103/PhysRevB.48.17695 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.692510.1103/PhysRevB.57.6925 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1338010.1103/PhysRevB.60.13380 ↗
16. 10.1002/cphc.20170081010.1002/cphc.201700810 ↗
17. 10.1039/C6SC05504D10.1039/C6SC05504D ↗
18. Massa L. · Int. J. Quantum Chem., Quantum Chem. Symp. · 1995 · 29 · 372
19. 10.1107/S056773947800188610.1107/S0567739478001886 ↗
20. Bader R. F. W. · 1994
21. 10.1107/S090744491001483610.1107/S0907444910014836 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp003255810.1021/jp0032558 ↗
23. 10.1002/chem.20070075610.1002/chem.200700756 ↗
24. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1967.tb01721.x10.1002/j.1538-7305.1967.tb01721.x ↗
25. 10.1107/S010876819400739110.1107/S0108768194007391 ↗
26. 10.1109/3.13517710.1109/3.135177 ↗
27. 10.1109/3.15951610.1109/3.159516 ↗
28. 10.1016/0030-4018(91)90227-510.1016/0030-4018(91)90227-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.10.06710.1016/j.molstruc.2004.10.067 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.36910.1103/PhysRevB.59.369 ↗
31. 10.1238/Physica.Topical.109a0012810.1238/Physica.Topical.109a00128 ↗
32. R. O.Diffraction CrysAlisPro Software system version v42.69a Rigaku Corporation 2022.
33. 10.1107/S160057671402298510.1107/S1600576714022985 ↗
34. 10.1107/S205225251901024810.1107/S2052252519010248 ↗
35. 10.1107/S205322961402421810.1107/S2053229614024218 ↗
36. 10.1107/S002188980804272610.1107/S0021889808042726 ↗
37. A.Volkov P.Macchi L. J.Farrugia C.Gatti P.Mallinson T.Richter T.Koritsanszky XD2016—A computer program for multipole refinement topological analysis of charge densities and evaluation of intermolecular energies from experimental or theoretical structure factors 2016.
38. 10.1107/S056773947900012710.1107/S0567739479000127 ↗
39. 10.1107/S002188981004248210.1107/S0021889810042482 ↗
40. 10.1107/S056773947600053310.1107/S0567739476000533 ↗
41. 10.1107/S056773947100030510.1107/S0567739471000305 ↗
42. A.Stash DRKplot for XD and SHELX Moscow 2007.10.1145/1324960.1324963 ↗
43. 10.1107/S010876730800687910.1107/S0108767308006879 ↗
44. 10.1107/S002188981202911110.1107/S0021889812029111 ↗
45. 10.1107/S002188980604185910.1107/S0021889806041859 ↗
46. 10.1002/wcms.136010.1002/wcms.1360 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
48. 10.1002/jcc.2601310.1002/jcc.26013 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.46788210.1063/1.467882 ↗
50. Frisch M. J. · 2009