Fabrication of Hyperuniform Dielectric Networks via Heat‐Induced Shrinkage Reveals a Bandgap at Telecom Wavelengths
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recent studies report photonic bandgaps (PBGs) in disordered hyperuniform network structures numerically and experimentally for high enough refractive index contrast. However, the smallest experimental central gap wavelength that one can realize experimentally is not close to the essential near‐infrared light spectrum with adverse consequences for specific applications and more advanced experimental studies. Indeed, standard direct laser writing (DLW) lithography does not allow fabrication at a much higher resolution. Here, the authors demonstrate heat‐treatment induced uniform shrinkage of the network's polymer template obtained by DLW to reach smaller feature sizes and subsequent silicon coating, resulting in a pronounced gap near telecom wavelengths.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics University of Fribourg Fribourg 1700 Switzerland
Université Côte d'Azur CNRS, Institut de Physique de Nice (INPHYNI) Nice 06100 France
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0038-1098(94)90202-X10.1016/0038-1098(94)90202-X ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.01390110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013901 ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms1443910.1038/ncomms14439 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41586-020-2718-610.1038/s41586-020-2718-6 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.191273011610.1073/pnas.1912730116 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.20800110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.208001 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.05390210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.053902 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.130787911010.1073/pnas.1307879110 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-019-56692-510.1038/s41598-019-56692-5 ↗
10. 10.1002/adom.20210256510.1002/adom.202102565 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.01261410.1103/PhysRevE.101.012614 ↗
12. 10.1088/0034-4885/71/7/07640110.1088/0034-4885/71/7/076401 ↗
13. 10.1002/adom.20190044210.1002/adom.201900442 ↗
14. 10.1038/3501302410.1038/35013024 ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat115510.1038/nmat1155 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20050167410.1002/adma.200501674 ↗
17. 10.1364/OL.35.00109410.1364/OL.35.001094 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep2181810.1038/srep21818 ↗
19. 10.1364/OPTICA.4.00036110.1364/OPTICA.4.000361 ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.090774410610.1073/pnas.0907744106 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.12740210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.127402 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.06381810.1103/PhysRevA.84.063818 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-020-18571-w10.1038/s41467-020-18571-w ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.05390210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.053902 ↗
25. Abrahams E. · 2010
26. 10.1073/pnas.170513011410.1073/pnas.1705130114 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.03.00110.1016/j.physrep.2018.03.001 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.296131410.1063/1.2961314 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.16740410.1103/PhysRevLett.107.167404 ↗
30. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.6210.1038/nphoton.2013.62 ↗
31. 10.1364/OL.44908410.1364/OL.449084 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.482710.1103/PhysRevE.50.4827 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20100089210.1002/adma.201000892 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41467-019-11452-x10.1038/s41467-019-11452-x ↗
35. 10.1364/OE.21.00105710.1364/OE.21.001057 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.04382210.1103/PhysRevA.88.043822 ↗
37. 10.1002/adom.20130049410.1002/adom.201300494 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20090183810.1002/adfm.200901838 ↗
39. 10.1002/adom.20130041510.1002/adom.201300415 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.280037210.1063/1.2800372 ↗
41. 10.1364/AO.51.00678910.1364/AO.51.006789 ↗
42. 10.1364/OL.44.00002910.1364/OL.44.000029 ↗
43. 10.1002/adom.20200169910.1002/adom.202001699 ↗
44. F.Scheffold J.Haberko L. S.Froufe‐Pérez arXiv:2204.07774 2022.
45. 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01512-210.1140/epjst/e2011-01512-2 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
47. 10.1038/nmat115510.1038/nmat1155 ↗
48. Pinna N. · 2012
49. 10.1515/978140082824110.1515/9781400828241 ↗
50. Hulst H. C. · 1981