Thermal Runaway of Silicon‐Based Laser Sails
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Laser sail‐based spacecraft—where a powerful Earth‐based laser propels a lightweight outer‐space vehicle—have been recently proposed by the Breakthrough Starshot Initiative as a means of reaching relativistic speeds for interstellar space travel. The laser intensity at the sail required for this task is at least 1 GW m−2 and, at such high intensities, thermal management of the sail becomes a significant challenge even when using materials with low linear absorption coefficients. Silicon is proposed as one leading candidate material for the sail due to its low sub‐bandgap absorption and high index of refraction, which allows for low‐mass‐density designs. However, here it is shown that the temperature‐dependent linear absorption of silicon can lead to thermal runaway at temperatures above 400–500 K for even the most optimistic viable assumptions of the material quality. Additionally, above a design‐specific threshold laser intensity, nonlinear two‐photon absorption triggers thermal runaway regardless of initial temperature. Resonator‐based designs, which concentrate the field, exhibit lower threshold intensities than geometries that minimize the electric field such as Bragg reflectors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics University of Wisconsin‐Madison 1150 University Ave Madison WI 53706 USA
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison WI 53706 USA
School of Electrical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Daejeon 34141 Korea
Funding
Breakthrough Prize Foundation · Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Breakthrough initiatives https://breakthroughinitiatives.org/initiative/3(accessed: November 2021).
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.16511610.1103/PhysRevB.88.165116 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41563-018-0075-810.1038/s41563-018-0075-8 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0048410.1021/acsphotonics.9b00484 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41566-019-0373-y10.1038/s41566-019-0373-y ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0203510.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02035 ↗
7. 10.1002/lpor.20190031110.1002/lpor.201900311 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0076810.1021/acsphotonics.0c00768 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.11716110.1063/1.117161 ↗
10. 10.1364/OL.38.00204710.1364/OL.38.002047 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.273735910.1063/1.2737359 ↗
12. 10.1364/AO.46.00811810.1364/AO.46.008118 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.00910.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.009 ↗
14. 10.1109/JSSC.1978.105101210.1109/JSSC.1978.1051012 ↗
15. 10.1088/0370-1328/73/2/31510.1088/0370-1328/73/2/315 ↗
16. 10.1364/OL.39384710.1364/OL.393847 ↗
17. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.10910.1038/nphoton.2012.109 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.486777610.1063/1.4867776 ↗
19. O. J.Edwards Optical absorption coefficients of fused silica in the wavelength range 0.17 to 3.5 microns from room temperature to 980 °C Technical Note D‐3257 NASA Washington D.C.1966.
20. 10.1016/0020-0891(79)90060-510.1016/0020-0891(79)90060-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00411-410.1016/S0022-3697(99)00411-4 ↗
22. 10.1364/JOSAB.4.00048110.1364/JOSAB.4.000481 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41563-019-0363-y10.1038/s41563-019-0363-y ↗
24. 10.3847/1538-3881/aaafd210.3847/1538-3881/aaafd2 ↗
25. 10.3847/2041-8213/aa619b10.3847/2041-8213/aa619b ↗
26. 10.1364/JOSAB.34.000C2510.1364/JOSAB.34.000C25 ↗
27. 10.1364/OE.21.00716210.1364/OE.21.007162 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.9427810.1063/1.94278 ↗
29. 10.1364/OPTICA.41700710.1364/OPTICA.417007 ↗
30. W.Jin C.Guo M.Orenstein S.Fan arXiv:2109.02702 2021.
31. 10.1364/OE.40884510.1364/OE.408845 ↗
32. J.Brewer M. F.Campbell P.Kumar S.Kulkarni D.Jariwala I.Bargatin A. P.Raman arXiv:2106.03558 2021.
33. 10.1364/OE.41471310.1364/OE.414713 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41598-019-46865-710.1038/s41598-019-46865-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/0390-5519(76)90022-310.1016/0390-5519(76)90022-3 ↗