journal article·2018-11

Optical Performance Study of Gyroid‐Structured TiO2 Photonic Crystals Replicated from Natural Templates Using a Sol‐Gel Method

Liping Wu, Wanlin Wang, Wang Zhang, Huilan Su, Jiajun Gu, Qinglei Liu, Di Zhang, Dejan Pantelić, Branislav Jelenković

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 6· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Photonic crystals with novel nanostructures have attracted huge attention due to their potential applications in manipulation of light propagation and next‐generation energy and information technologies. In this work, TiO2 photonic crystals with 3D bicontinuous gyroid structure in visible light wavelength range are successfully fabricated by templating from natural templates using a sol‐gel method. This is the first time to report controlling the volume fraction (VF) through regulating the rinsing time of templates in the sol‐gel precursor. Gyroid‐structured TiO2 photonic crystals (GTPCs) with different VFs, 3.2, 8.0, and 13.5% are obtained. Combined with finite‐difference time‐domain simulations, the photonic bandgap properties of the GTPCs are systematically studied. Based on this work, one step is moved further toward the exploitation of the optical performance of the GTPCs in visible light wavelength range beyond the previous simulation works.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Optical Coatings and Gratings · Photonic and Optical Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Lab of Metal Matrix Composite Shanghai Jiao Tong University 800# Dongchuan Rd. Shanghai 200240 China

College of Electronic Science and Technology Shenzhen University Shenzhen 518060 P. R. China

Institute of physics University of Belgrade Pregrevica 118 11080 Belgrade Serbia

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai · Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1142/649610.1142/6496 ↗
2. 10.1098/rstb.2007.225810.1098/rstb.2007.2258 ↗
3. 10.1002/cphc.20050000710.1002/cphc.200500007 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20090285210.1002/adma.200902852 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20120352910.1002/adma.201203529 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.283930810.1063/1.2839308 ↗
7. 10.1364/OE.19.00314410.1364/OE.19.003144 ↗
8. 10.1038/srep4220710.1038/srep42207 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.35510.1038/nphoton.2011.355 ↗
10. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.210.1038/nphoton.2007.2 ↗
11. 10.1088/1468-6996/12/6/06470410.1088/1468-6996/12/6/064704 ↗
12. 10.1126/sciadv.160008410.1126/sciadv.1600084 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.151135411210.1073/pnas.1511354112 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0020110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00201 ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.090961610710.1073/pnas.0909616107 ↗
16. 10.1179/135100005X5737310.1179/135100005X57373 ↗
17. 10.1098/rsif.2007.106510.1098/rsif.2007.1065 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20090061510.1002/adma.200900615 ↗
19. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.23310.1038/nphoton.2013.233 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20120278810.1002/adma.201202788 ↗
21. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/08303210.1088/1367-2630/14/8/083032 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20029001810.1002/adma.200290018 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.7310.1103/PhysRevLett.83.73 ↗
24. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.4210.1038/nphoton.2013.42 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.aaa927310.1126/science.aaa9273 ↗
26. 10.1002/adom.20150043610.1002/adom.201500436 ↗
27. 10.1039/c1cc11637a10.1039/c1cc11637a ↗
28. 10.1039/c2ra22506a10.1039/c2ra22506a ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.01.00410.1016/j.jsb.2011.01.004 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.10390210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.103902 ↗
31. 10.1002/jmor.105202010610.1002/jmor.1052020106 ↗
32. 10.1098/rsif.2009.035210.1098/rsif.2009.0352 ↗
33. 10.1364/OE.18.02676010.1364/OE.18.026760 ↗
34. 10.1098/rsfs.2016.015410.1098/rsfs.2016.0154 ↗
35. 10.1126/sciadv.160014910.1126/sciadv.1600149 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20160323310.1002/adfm.201603233 ↗