journal article·2024-01Open access

Extreme Nonreciprocity in Metasurfaces Based on Bound States in the Continuum

Luis Manuel Máñez‐Espina, Ihar Faniayeu, Viktar Asadchy, Ana Díaz‐Rubio

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Nonreciprocal devices, including optical isolators, phase shifters, and amplifiers, are pivotal for advanced optical systems. However, exploiting natural materials is challenging due to their weak magneto‐optical (MO) effects, requiring substantial thickness to construct effective optical devices. In this study, it is demonstrated that subwavelength metasurfaces supporting bound states in the continuum (BICs) and made of conventional ferrimagnetic material can exhibit strong nonreciprocity in the Faraday configuration and near‐unity magnetic circular dichroism (MCD). These metasurfaces enhance the MO effect by 3–4 orders of magnitude compared to a continuous film of the same material. This significant enhancement is achieved by leveraging Huygens' condition in the metasurface whose structural units support paired electric and magnetic dipole resonances. The multi‐mode temporal coupled mode theory (CMT) is developed for the observed enhancement of the MO effect, and the findings with the full‐wave simulations are confirmed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanophotonics Technology Center Universitat Politècnica de València Camí de Vera s/n Valencia 46022 Spain

Department of Physics University of Gothenburg Origovägen 6B Gothenburg 41296 Sweden

Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering Aalto University Maarintie 8 Espoo 02150 Finland

Funding

Ministerio de Universidades · Agencia Estatal de Investigación · Academy of Finland

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/2040-8986/ab161d10.1088/2040-8986/ab161d ↗
2. 10.3390/cryst1212176910.3390/cryst12121769 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6633/aa873210.1088/1361-6633/aa8732 ↗
4. 10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/07640110.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401 ↗
5. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.18510.1038/nphoton.2013.185 ↗
6. 10.1109/JPROC.2020.301238110.1109/JPROC.2020.3012381 ↗
7. Lifshitz E. · 1995
8. 10.1038/nnano.2011.5410.1038/nnano.2011.54 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.37012010.1063/1.370120 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.37284010.1063/1.372840 ↗
11. 10.1109/68.87422510.1109/68.874225 ↗
12. 10.1002/adom.20120001110.1002/adom.201200011 ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms260910.1038/ncomms2609 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b0049010.1021/acsphotonics.5b00490 ↗
15. 10.1002/adom.20200010010.1002/adom.202000100 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11082-022-04012-z10.1007/s11082-022-04012-z ↗
17. 10.1364/OL.43.00183810.1364/OL.43.001838 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0169210.1021/acsphotonics.1c01692 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.506630710.1063/1.5066307 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-020-19310-x10.1038/s41467-020-19310-x ↗
21. 10.1163/156939300X0109410.1163/156939300X01094 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.01402410.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.014024 ↗
23. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.4810.1038/natrevmats.2016.48 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.16111210.1103/PhysRevB.98.161112 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.06740110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.067401 ↗
26. 10.1002/lpor.20220059710.1002/lpor.202200597 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.09390310.1103/PhysRevLett.125.093903 ↗
28. 10.1002/adom.20210079710.1002/adom.202100797 ↗
29. 10.1088/1367-2630/acb9b310.1088/1367-2630/acb9b3 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0000310.1021/acsphotonics.0c00003 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.19390310.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.508705410.1063/1.5087054 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.798210.1103/PhysRevB.52.7982 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.03543410.1103/PhysRevB.102.035434 ↗
35. 10.1364/OE.27.01644910.1364/OE.27.016449 ↗
36. 10.1134/S002136402001010510.1134/S0021364020010105 ↗
37. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-041210.1515/nanoph-2021-0412 ↗
38. 10.1109/JQE.2004.83477310.1109/JQE.2004.834773 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.03383910.1103/PhysRevA.99.033839 ↗
40. 10.1515/nanoph-2017-011710.1515/nanoph-2017-0117 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41467-019-11175-z10.1038/s41467-019-11175-z ↗
42. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0135210.1021/acsphotonics.9b01352 ↗
43. 10.1364/OME.6.00198610.1364/OME.6.001986 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0010010.1021/acsphotonics.1c00100 ↗
45. 10.1007/b13837610.1007/b138376 ↗
46. 10.1364/OL.36.00425410.1364/OL.36.004254 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.01400910.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.014009 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.19541810.1103/PhysRevB.93.195418 ↗
49. C.Caloz A.Sihvola arXiv:1903.09087 2019.
50. 10.1351/pac20077903029310.1351/pac200779030293 ↗
51. 10.1515/nanoph-2017-011710.1515/nanoph-2017-0117 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0061210.1021/acsphotonics.1c00612 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.03100510.1103/PhysRevX.5.031005 ↗
54. 10.1017/CBO978051184500010.1017/CBO9780511845000 ↗
55. S. S.Jazi I.Faniayeu R.Cichelero D. C.Tzarouchis M. M.Asgari A.Dmitriev S.Fan V.Asadchy arXiv:2307.09275 2023.