journal article·2022-02Open access

Probing Vibrational Strong Coupling of Molecules with Wavelength‐Modulated Raman Spectroscopy

Kishan S. Menghrajani, Mingzhou Chen, Kishan Dholakia, William L. Barnes

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 10· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique that enables fingerprinting of materials, molecules, and chemical environments by probing vibrational resonances. In many applications, the desired Raman signals are masked by fluorescence, either from the molecular system being studied, or from adjacent metallic nanostructures. Here, it is shown that wavelength‐modulated Raman spectroscopy provides a powerful way to significantly reduce the strength of the fluorescence background, thereby allowing the desired Raman signals to be clearly recorded. This approach is made use of to explore Raman scattering in the context of vibrational strong coupling, an area that has thus far been problematic to visualise. Specifically, strong coupling between the vibrational modes in a polymer and two types of confined light field, the fundamental mode of a metal‐clad microcavity, and the surface‐plasmon modes of an adjacent thin metal film are looked at. While clear advantages in using the wavelength‐modulated Raman approach are found, these results on strong coupling are inconclusive, and highlight the need for more work in this exciting topic area.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Strong Light-Matter Interactions · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Exeter ‐ Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Exeter Exeter EX4 4QL UK

SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy University of St. Andrews St. Andrews KY16 9SS UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · European Research Council · Leverhulme Trust

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C4CS00282B10.1039/C4CS00282B ↗
2. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/35/35300210.1088/0953-8984/28/35/353002 ↗
3. 10.1039/b821100k10.1039/b821100k ↗
4. 10.1039/C8AY00016F10.1039/C8AY00016F ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-12-804162-8.00006-910.1016/B978-0-12-804162-8.00006-9 ↗
6. Xu H. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 24
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.03542710.1103/PhysRevB.72.035427 ↗
8. 10.1021/ac301696p10.1021/ac301696p ↗
9. 10.1080/05704928.2014.99993610.1080/05704928.2014.999936 ↗
10. 10.1366/00037020778259700310.1366/000370207782597003 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01427-X10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01427-X ↗
12. 10.1366/00037020778126987310.1366/000370207781269873 ↗
13. 10.1021/ac300763q10.1021/ac300763q ↗
14. 10.1366/12-0685210.1366/12-06852 ↗
15. 10.1364/OE.18.01138210.1364/OE.18.011382 ↗
16. Chen M. · J. Biophotonics · 2018 · 11
17. 10.1002/jbio.20170024410.1002/jbio.201700244 ↗
18. 10.1038/s42003-020-0915-310.1038/s42003-020-0915-3 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0029510.1021/acs.accounts.6b00295 ↗
20. 10.1039/C6FD00095A10.1039/C6FD00095A ↗
21. 10.1039/C8CS00193F10.1039/C8CS00193F ↗
22. 10.1021/ph500334710.1021/ph5003347 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms698110.1038/ncomms6981 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.23830110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.238301 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0068010.1021/acsphotonics.7b00680 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8SC01043A10.1039/C8SC01043A ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.190079511610.1073/pnas.1900795116 ↗
28. 10.1002/adom.20190040310.1002/adom.201900403 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0066210.1021/acsphotonics.9b00662 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b0032410.1021/acsphotonics.5b00324 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20150297910.1002/anie.201502979 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.12680210.1103/PhysRevLett.118.126802 ↗
33. 10.1364/OE.24.01236710.1364/OE.24.012367 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.1963.07007051210.1002/app.1963.070070512 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0022610.1021/acsphotonics.6b00226 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.602410.1103/PhysRevB.48.6024 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.35217810.1063/1.352178 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1165410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11654 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.02384310.1103/PhysRevA.94.023843 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c1036010.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10360 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0084110.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00841 ↗
42. 10.1007/BFb004831710.1007/BFb0048317 ↗
43. 2007
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.21.153010.1103/PhysRevLett.21.1530 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.15541210.1103/PhysRevB.66.155412 ↗
46. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.34010.1038/nphoton.2012.340 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0021910.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00219 ↗
48. 10.1088/0034-4885/78/1/01390110.1088/0034-4885/78/1/013901 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00923-X10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00923-X ↗
50. 10.1080/00387010.2015.104411310.1080/00387010.2015.1044113 ↗
51. We also investigated samples for which there was no metal in the groove regions. The WMRS data from these samples showed evidence of extra features at both ≈ 1590 and 1320 cm−1 and the calculated electric field distributions showed a local electric field enhancement at the edges of the grooves an enhancement not apparent in similar calculations for structures similar to those reported above.
52. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c0381510.1021/acs.jpcb.0c03815 ↗
53. 10.1371/journal.pone.012515810.1371/journal.pone.0125158 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41598-017-10234-z10.1038/s41598-017-10234-z ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.23514710.1103/PhysRevB.86.235147 ↗
56. 10.1016/B978-0-08-054721-3.50029-010.1016/B978-0-08-054721-3.50029-0 ↗