Geometry Defines Ultrafast Hot‐Carrier Dynamics and Kerr Nonlinearity in Plasmonic Metamaterial Waveguides and Cavities
Source abstract
Abstract
Hot carrier dynamics in plasmonic nanorod metamaterials and its influence on the metamaterial's optical Kerr nonlinearity is studied. The electron temperature distribution induced by an optical pump in the metallic component of the plasmonic metamaterial leads to geometry‐dependent variations of the optical response and its dynamics as observed in both the transmission and reflection properties of the metamaterial slab. Thus, the ultrafast dynamics of a metamaterial's optical response can be controlled via modal engineering. Both the transient response relaxation time and magnitude of the nonlinearity are shown to depend on the modal‐induced spatial profile of the electron temperature distribution and the hot‐electron diffusion in nanorods. The nonlocal effects, depending on the excitation‐induced losses in the metal, are shown to dictate the modal structure of the metamaterial slab and the associated dynamics of its nonlinear response. The opportunity of controlling the electron temperature profile induced in the plasmonic nanorods by changing the metamaterial's geometry and/or excitation conditions paves the way to achieve controllable dynamics of the nonlinear optical response for free‐space as well as integrated nanophotonic applications involving nonequilibrium electrons.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics King's College London Strand, London WC2R 2LS UK
Department of Physics University of North Florida Jacksonville FL 32224 USA
Department of Physics and Applied Physics University of Massachusetts Lowell One University Ave Lowell MA 01854 USA
Funding
European Research Council · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Army Research Office · Wolfson Foundation · Royal Society
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2014.31110.1038/nnano.2014.311 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat428110.1038/nmat4281 ↗
3. 10.1515/nanoph-2016-000710.1515/nanoph-2016-0007 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl502485410.1021/nl5024854 ↗
5. 10.1038/nnano.2015.16510.1038/nnano.2015.165 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27810.1038/nnano.2010.278 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.15410.1038/nphoton.2011.154 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl501283c10.1021/nl501283c ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat343110.1038/nmat3431 ↗
10. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.24410.1038/nphoton.2012.244 ↗
11. 10.1002/lpor.20090003510.1002/lpor.200900035 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms875710.1038/ncomms8757 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20110316210.1002/adma.201103162 ↗
14. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/01303310.1088/1367-2630/15/1/013033 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.24542010.1103/PhysRevB.80.245420 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0050910.1021/acsphotonics.6b00509 ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.23.01432910.1364/OE.23.014329 ↗
18. 10.1002/lpor.20140045710.1002/lpor.201400457 ↗
19. 10.1038/lsa.2016.27310.1038/lsa.2016.273 ↗
20. 10.1364/OE.22.01098710.1364/OE.22.010987 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.12740510.1103/PhysRevLett.102.127405 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.03511110.1103/PhysRevB.89.035111 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.11.01410.1016/j.ssc.2004.11.014 ↗
24. 10.1364/OE.21.01651410.1364/OE.21.016514 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms146410.1038/ncomms1464 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl302322t10.1021/nl302322t ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0078910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00789 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.242289310.1063/1.2422893 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.optcom.2014.03.00510.1016/j.optcom.2014.03.005 ↗
30. 10.1117/12.54568410.1117/12.545684 ↗
31. 10.1016/B978-0-12-369470-6.00002-210.1016/B978-0-12-369470-6.00002-2 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRev.96.53510.1103/PhysRev.96.535 ↗
33. 10.1002/pssb.20064209710.1002/pssb.200642097 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.06.02210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.06.022 ↗
35. 10.1038/srep1767810.1038/srep17678 ↗